search for: domcapabilities

...unch-libvirt.c b/lib/launch-libvirt.c index 864eae314..f2cad9300 100644 --- a/lib/launch-libvirt.c +++ b/lib/launch-libvirt.c @@ -431,7 +431,12 @@ launch_libvirt (guestfs_h *g, void *datav, const char *libvirt_uri) if (parse_capabilities (g, capabilities_xml, data) == -1) goto cleanup; - domcapabilities_xml = virConnectGetDomainCapabilities (conn, NULL, NULL, NULL, + domcapabilities_xml = virConnectGetDomainCapabilities (conn, NULL, NULL, +#ifdef MACHINE_TYPE + MACHINE_TYPE, +#else + NU...

...custom QEMU, e.g.: $ ./configure [...] QEMU=/path/to/qemu then the libvirt backend did not use to override it, launching the appliance with the default QEMU for libvirt. This does not change the manual emulator overriding using set-hv. Pino Toscano (2): launch: libvirt: get default QEMU from domcapabilities launch: libvirt: fix custom hypervisor check lib/launch-libvirt.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.21.0

When SEV is enabled in domcapabilities does that just mean any of SEV, SEV-ES, SEV-SNP is possible on the hardware? Similarly, does enabling SEV as a launchSecurity option in a domainXML mean that whichever SEV is available will be enabled? And if the guest policy has the ES flag set, it will not be created unless ES is enabled? Sorr...

ok thanks , but then can we know which all list of feature are supported by QEMU/KVM release. http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM_Features Does not seem to be all corect . On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:51:06 +0530, akhilesh rawat wrote: > > hi , > > > > I am creating Guest by Libvirt tool "

Dear Sir/Madam: I use virt-manager to create a new virtual machine(it's name is generic), then I edit generic to set it's cpu_mode as 'host-model', and I start it, but when dumpxml generic, it's cpu_mode is changed as 'custom'. I want to know that why it is? And what's the principle of dumpxml? Thanks! A user of libvirt

Hi, i have atwo node HA-cluster with pacemaker, corosync, libvirt and KVM. Recently i configured a new VirtualDomain which runs fine, but live Migration does not succeed. This is the error: VirtualDomain(vm_snipanalysis)[14322]: 2019/09/18_16:56:54 ERROR: snipanalysis: live migration to ha-idg-2 failed: 1 Sep 18 16:56:54 [6970] ha-idg-1 lrmd: notice: operation_finished:

Starting with 5.2.0, libvirt has a way to select the firmware by specifying its type, provided configuration files for the firmware are shipped. Currently we start the appliance as UEFI if any of the firmware are found, so instead we can try to just set the firmware type iff: - the libvirt autoselection works - the 'efi' firmware is available The only behaviour change is that the default

Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:52:38 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from >> virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine > >> while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's >> not completely surprising. >>

...o the engine volume and boot it. > >> > It is the boot that causes the problem, I get an error about the CPU : > >> > the CPU is incompatible with host CPU: Host CPU does not provide required features: mpx > >> > > >> > This is the CPU part from virsh domcapabilities on my physical machine > >> > <cpu> > >> > <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/> > >> > <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'> > >> > <model fallback='forbid'>Skyla...