search for: domained

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Good morning :) Am 04.01.2024 um 20:17 schrieb lists--- via samba: > Am 04.01.2024 um 13:28 schrieb lists--- via samba: >> Am 04.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:57 +0100 >>> lists--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 04.01.2024 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:

On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if >>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf? >>> >>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that >>> >>>

>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >> >> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there is >> some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the top >> levels: FQDN and _msdcs.FQDN). >> >> Could this have to do with...

Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>> >>>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>>> is some entry for the

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:20 AM Philippe LeCavalier < support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:09 AM Philippe LeCavalier < > support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> A setup on howto improve your samba

Hmm.. > >>>> Could this have to do with... > >>>> a) I demoted my initial 1st DC (seized FSMO roles) and got rid of > >>>> DNS entries via this script on the wiki? > >>>> b) set up the *new* 2nd DC on the hardware of the prior 1st DC > >>>> (with the same IP address)? This can be a problem yes, depending on the order of

Am 04.01.2024 um 13:28 schrieb lists--- via samba: > Am 04.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:57 +0100 >> lists--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Am 04.01.2024 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:19:17 +0100 >>>> lists--- via samba <samba at

On 10/12/15 15:13, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, >>>>> just again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> If I go through the DNS

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: ========================= 1). VBD could not work well Partial support is added in c/s 13198, but the loader still complains that symbol "irq_to_evtchn_port" is missing. 2). IA32E: IA32E vista can''t boot up normally, it gives a blue screen. Then the qemu window

Hi Ole, Using internal DNS samba_dnsupdate does not work correctly, at least not every time. Someone modified this samba_dnsupdate tool commenting this line: os.unlink(tmpfile) which should line 413. Doing that he was able to get files generated by samba_dnsupdate to use them as argument of nsupdate command (without -g switch and with "allow dns updates = nonsecure" in smb.conf). I

Hello everyone, Can I ask for some assistance please. Apologies if there is an easy solution to this tail of wow that I haven't been able to find online. We've been having persistent problems with a Scientific Linux release 7.4 machine that is joined to an Active Directory domain. Ever 30 days or so it trust relationship between the server and the domain would fail, apparently because

On 27 January 2016 at 18:09, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Use the same krb5.conf on members as on DC, no? > > Tried... same error msg. > 2016-01-27 7:42 GMT+01:00 Henry McLaughlin <henry at incred.com.au>: > >> On 27 January 2016 at 17:40, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >>

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

Hi all, It seems "samba-tool ldapcmp" does not support too much items in Samba's database. Playing for a while with DB I was never able to run ldapcmp successfully. So yesterday I installed a platform to fill piece by piece my two small DCs and to run ldapcmp. The process follows. Test platform: 2 DCs using Debian 8.1 "net install" with only system tools, up to date,

Mark, Below xxx.yyy. is my network prefix. [global] workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL server string = Server %v security = ADS client signing = auto client use spnego = yes kerberos method = secrets and keytab log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 3 max log size = 50 load printers = No printcap name = /dev/null idmap config * :

Hi Marcel thx. for your fast response. I didn't manage to follow up sooner. I had already verbose logging turned on but I don't seem to find the real reason, why the domain controller searchs for a userPrincipalName instead of servicePrincipalName. Because I wasn't sure whether it is the nfs client process or the server process that failed to get the kerberos ticket when I tried the

Hi all, I have a following problem: - Remus network buffering doesn''t work. It seems to be because of no vif is reported by the function server.xend.domain on line 29 of /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/xen/remus/vm.py (seen using pdb) : 27 if domid: 28 try: 29 self.dominfo = server.xend.domain(domid, ''all'') >

Dovecot 2.2.31 with mailboxes in mdbox format. Since a couple of days some mailboxes have the problem, that sieve rules moving mails to folders stop working and .sieve.log in mailbox shows: sieve: info: started log at Sep 07 13:57:17. error: msgid=<20170907155704.EGroupware.S4yThVJRr12WSiJLpKbK0Bz at somedomain.egroupware.de>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX/Munser': Mailbox

Hello! I tryed to configure Debian Linux file server as Windows 2003 domain member using samba with security = ADS mode and stucked with such problem: File server (fs) succesfully joined my domain with correct user and group mapping (i'm using idmap rid). Users from domain have their unix accounts with <DOMAIN_NAME>\ prefix, i.e for domain user "andrey" i have local unix