search for: dofinazli

...ought =) I’ve always thought that the only guarantee is that doFinalization(Module &M) runs after runOnFunction() was executed for all functions in M, and there’s no guarantee it runs *immediately* after. That is, a PM may run a bunch of function passes over each function, and only then call doFinazliation() for each pass. That means that, even though you get a mutable reference to the module, the module you’ll see is quite different from what you may expect. People more familiar with the pass managers – please correct me if I’m wrong. I don't really mind at all if other passes run or e...

On 5/6/15 10:19 AM, Kuperstein, Michael M wrote: > > Hello Cristiano, > > I don’t think doFinalization() is really meant to be used this way. > My understanding is that doInitialization() and doFinalization() are designed specifically for modifying the LLVM IR (otherwise, why would a mutable reference to the Function be provided)? If that is not the case, then there is either a

...ght that the only guarantee is that > doFinalization(Module &M) runs after runOnFunction() was executed for > all functions in M, and there’s no guarantee it runs *immediately* after. > > That is, a PM may run a bunch of function passes over each function, > and only then call doFinazliation() for each pass. That means that, > even though you get a mutable reference to the module, the module > you’ll see is quite different from what you may expect. > Correct. You're guaranteed that doFinalization() is run after your pass has been executed over all the functions....