search for: doefert

...QFipryfAPU/edit#slide=id.g7d334b12e5_0_4> (outlining > a possible path to incremental adoption of MLIR in Clang) for anyone > curious. > > -Chris Greetings, As to David Blaike's suggestion I'm merging the two threads for this discussion. The original commenters is Johannes Doefert starting with Hey,: > Hey, > > Apologies for the wait, everything right now is going crazy.. Compiler Folks are very busy people as there aren't as much of us unfortunately so no need to apologize. I've yet to heard from someone on the GCC side and will wait until after GCC 11 is...

...GO presentation slides (outlining a possible path to incremental adoption of MLIR in Clang) for anyone curious. >> >> -Chris >> >> Greetings, >> As to David Blaike's suggestion I'm merging the two threads for this discussion. The original commenters is Johannes Doefert >> starting with Hey,: >> >> Hey, >> >> Apologies for the wait, everything right now is going crazy.. >> >> Compiler Folks are very busy people as there aren't as much of us unfortunately so no need to >> apologize. I've yet to heard from some...

On Feb 28, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/28, Nicholas Krause via llvm-dev wrote: >> Anyhow what is the status and what parts are we planning to move to >> MLIR in LLVM/Clang. I've not seen any discussion on that other than >> starting to plan for it. > > As far as I know, there is no