search for: doctree

I''ve got an XML file which is pretty well structured. I need to retrieve specific elements from that file to fill out empty HTML elements on a page. I think what I need is xPath? Or - is that overkill? Is there some easier way to locate an XML element? What I have in mind is pulling the XML file using Ajax, then xPath to get the bits I need. Am I on the right path and does

...a strong >> preference). >> > > Hi Sean, > > I've created ReleaseProcess.rst, how can I force generation of HTML on the > rst file without rebuilding the whole thing? > > The following incantation should work (invoked from docs/): sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees . _build/html $BUILD_THIS.rst Basically, this is the command that the makefile executes by default, with $BUILD_THIS.rst appended. Trailing filenames given to sphinx-build are interpreted to mean that it should build just those; if given no filenames (as when invoked by the Makefile), it defaults...

...t;> >> Hi Sean, >> >> I've created ReleaseProcess.rst, how can I force generation of HTML on >> the rst file without rebuilding the whole thing? >> >> > The following incantation should work (invoked from docs/): > > sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees . _build/html $BUILD_THIS.rst > > Basically, this is the command that the makefile executes by default, with > $BUILD_THIS.rst appended. Trailing filenames given to sphinx-build are > interpreted to mean that it should build just those; if given no filenames > (as when invoked by th...

On 26 May 2013 03:03, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > AFAIK, the closest we have is <http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html>, > which details basically what the release manager has to do (i.e., the > audience is LLVM developers, and release managers in particular). I really > liked the article you linked because it seemed to be targeted at an > audience

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 25 May 2013 20:42, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Could you please incorporate this useful document into LLVM's official >> documentation? I think that this is good content for encouraging greater >> external/downstream involvement in the release process.