search for: doclib

...etailed documentation of R(D)Com. Does anybody know where I can find it, or do you have any form of experience of the use of R with Windev? Thanks for your help. PS : As I am new to the group, people interested in some details about the requestor could find his resume at address http://e-doclib.aqte.be/docs-doc-view.php?doc_id=303. Best regards. Constant Depièreux Managing Director Applied Quality Technologies Europe sprl Rue des Déportés 123 B-4800 Verviers +32 87 29 21 75 www.aqte.be ---- Ce message a été scanné avec Norton anti-virus, dernière mise à jour disponible en ligne -----...

...ctions to function names (bonus clue: it also makes them symmetrical), then _mm_movpi64_pi64 is indeed a typo and Clang's header is wrong, while GCC's is correct: it should read _mm_movpi64_epi64(), not _mm_movpi64_pi64(). ./danfe [1] http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/iss/2013/compiler/cpp-lin/GUID-AFA947A7-8490-443B-9946-C7B16C8E6244.htm

Dear R users, Can someone inform me about a library/function in R that fits a Plackett-Dale model ? Thanks in advance Pryseley --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...terms of refactorings and > expect things would change, but just being stable enough that using > them isn't more work than necessary.) Maybe we can start the discussion by deciding if we want to use metadata or intrinsics. [1] - http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/stdxe/2013/composerxe/compiler/cpp-lin/index.htm#GUID-B25ABCC2-BE6F-4599-AEDF-2434F4676E1B.htm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121106/87e75a2b/attachment.html>

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> >> To: "David Tweed" <david.tweed at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 11:08:23 AM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Regarding BOF: Vectorization in

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> > To: "David Tweed" <david.tweed at gmail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 11:08:23 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Regarding BOF: Vectorization in LLVM > > Hi David! > > On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:23 AM, David Tweed <david.tweed at

...heme<elf> \-PE 0x3ab60000-3ab85000 \ uxtheme ELF 0x3c92b000-3c93f000 Deferred avicap32<elf> \-PE 0x3c930000-3c93f000 \ avicap32 PE 0x3c950000-3c970000 Deferred pbkils ELF 0x401be000-402b4000 Deferred kernel32<elf> \-PE 0x401e0000-402b4000 \ kernel32 PE 0x40330000-40338000 Deferred doclib ELF 0x452f2000-45311000 Deferred ximcp.so.2 PE 0x45900000-45917000 Deferred wdpacn ELF 0x45c57000-45c75000 Deferred mpr<elf> \-PE 0x45c60000-45c75000 \ mpr ELF 0x460d4000-461ea000 Export user32<elf> \-PE 0x460f0000-461ea000 \ user32 PE 0x48000000-4806c000 Deferred riched20 PE 0x48960000...

Alright, I give up. I'm going to go out in the parking lot and scream. Over the years I have built many, many versions of Samba on many versions of BSD[386,OS] and other unixen. I have never, ever had trouble like this (except, of course, with Irix). Never with a BSD. 4.2 ships with Samba 2.0.6 (why? -- 2.0.7 was released last April). I've been running 2.0.7 on a DEC Alpha running OSF