search for: docecot

I do have two questions related to the managesieve setup in dovecot 1) I did setup a global sieve filter, that is invoked if a user has no other sieve filter. If a user installs a sieve filter and activates it (PUTSCRIPT, SETACTIVE) then the sieve filter gets compiled (.sievec) and deliver does use it. If I want to deactivate the filter (SETACTIVE "") only the symlink (to the .sieve

Is dovecot still considered unreliable when combined with NFS? Is this true for mbox only, or Maildir as well? If dovecot Is still considered unreliable with NFS, how about having a dovecot mode that would chain into procmail for delivery, so that dovecot doesn't (necessarily) have to reinvent that wheel? Thanks!

...-based backend servers. I wand external clients who connects to this proxy Dovecot to use TLS (this is easy to set up) while want to have unsecured (plain IMAP/POP) connections to backends. You see, links to backends are over LAN so no TLS needed, and these backends are poor old machines (with old Docecots like 2.0.6) this is why I don't want to use TLS to acces backends. But as I did the test setup I can see proxy Dovecot uses TLS to connect to backends. Is there any way I can specify this aspect of Dovecot proxy? Please advice! Yours, Alexander -------------- next part -------------- An H...

...#39;t come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the user's Inbox, anyway. I suppose I kind of figured DoceCot would see the SPF softfail in the message header and automagically route that message to Junk, but it didn't. I've looked around Google and the Dovecot documentation to see if there are any instructions on how to do this, but I can't find anything. Is there an easy way to do this or d...

Hi there, Dovecot's LMTP implementation and Pigeonhole Sieve already do support the <user><delimiter><suffix> format. RfC 5233, the Sieve subaddress extension, also offers <prefix><delimiter><user>. Could Docecot's LMTP and Pigeonhole be extended to that effect? Thanks & greetings, Paul

On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Andrzej A. Filip <andrzej.filip at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Are docecot and postfix located on the same server? > Can postfix access (deliver) directly maildir file directory dovecot uses? > For the moment yes they are on the same server. I designed it to be modular, the various components can be placed on different systems with no configuration changes requir...

...le out of my depth in this case. But clearly ssh is installed, because that's what I'm running, and the sshd allows a connect and I get a return from ls. So, it's working fine outside the container. And I only need to execute doveadm sync inside the container. [Because that's where docecot/doveadm is installed.] So, it sure seems to me that I've got everything in place, at least in terms of ssh/sshd. I'm not even sure how I'd ssh directly to a sshd inside the container. AT> You need both. sshd where you try to connect to, and ssh on where you try to connect from. AT...

Why is docecot called dovecot? Actually, nobody likes these "rats with wings". ;-) Timo, can we know that or is it a secret? Sven

.... I added some services regarding http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication If i send a local mail on one server it will not be replicated to the other server until i run doveadm sync. Maybe i just missed some steps in my setup? doveadm user '*' displays the right users on both servers. === docecot.conf === # 2.2.13 (7b25994a8cb7): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab076.8 x86_64 Debian 7.5 auth_mechanisms = plain login ntlm disable_plaintext_auth = no dsync_remote_cmd = ssh -p 4711 -l%{login} %{host} doveadm dsync -u%u listen = *,[::] log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S &...

Is anyone running docecot on a home LAN. to give an IMAP feed to other machines on the LAN? I am running dovecot on my desktop, alfred. I want to collect email on my laptop, william, using KMail. As far as I can tell, dovecot is running perfectly. I can bring email from /var/spool/mail/tim on alfred to the same directory...

On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Andrzej A. Filip <andrzej.filip at gmail.com> wrote: > > <..snip..> > Could you provide the following info: > a) mailbox type (maildir/mbox/dbox/...) maildir > [mail_location in dovecot's config] /srv/mail/<domain>/<user-mailbox>/ > b) file system type (ext2/ext3/ext4/fat32/...) > [provided by "df -T"

...own mail storage driver maildir First problem is that based on example #2 from above provided syntax in https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat is incorrect or for some reason is not working for me as it should for example #1. Second issue is not recognizing maildir format ? what about that? Docecot has some missing libraries? Thanks, Adam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190621/e26204c1/attachment-0001.html>

...messages as deleted, they are moved to thee Trash folder and also with Outlook works well. It's like when a messages is deleted from TB, the message get moved to the Trash folder, and it's expunged(?) at the same time. Is it possible? Could you help me? The system is Ubuntu 9.04 with docecot 1.2.5-0~auto+0 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/, but builded by myself for x86_64. Thank you, tamas

...gt; > >> > while want to have unsecured (plain IMAP/POP) connections to > > backends. > > > >> > > > > >> > You see, links to backends are over LAN so no TLS needed, and these > > > >> > backends are poor old machines (with old Docecots like 2.0.6) this > > is > > > >> > why I don't want to use TLS to acces backends. > > > >> > > > > >> > But as I did the test setup I can see proxy Dovecot uses TLS to > > > >> > connect to backends. Is there any way...

>> Hi! >> Now I have to check, if this a Thunderbird-Issue or is this a >> dovecot-issue. For that reason, I will activate the extended logging >> of dovecot. > <snip/> >> I cant see such events in the logfiles. Which switch is to turn on to >> log all events? >> Or do anyone know the reason for the annoying >>

...d (plain IMAP/POP) connections to > > > > backends. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > You see, links to backends are over LAN so no TLS needed, and > > these > > > > > >> > backends are poor old machines (with old Docecots like 2.0.6) > > this > > > > is > > > > > >> > why I don't want to use TLS to acces backends. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > But as I did the test setup I can see proxy Dovecot uses TLS to > > > &...

On 15/04/2019 10:31, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > It always shows the autoindex. And yes built from sources.? I'm the > FreeBSD port maintainer for mail/docecot.? This has been happening for > several releases. > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> on behalf of John > Fawcett via dove...

Timo/Aki/Docecot guys, any hints here? Is this a bug? Design issue? On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> We just had a bunch of backend boxes go down due to...

...on my system] > > As I said ext4. > > Since I posted I've changed a couple of things: ulimit -n 8192, and > disabled fsync as in mail_fsync = never. I'm not sure if I'll put it > back in the LMTP section or not. Given all the hardware abstraction > layers. Are docecot and postfix located on the same server? Can postfix access (deliver) directly maildir file directory dovecot uses? -- A. Filip

Chad M Stewart <cms at balius.com> wrote: > On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Andrzej A. Filip <andrzej.filip at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Are docecot and postfix located on the same server? >> Can postfix access (deliver) directly maildir file directory dovecot uses? >> > > For the moment yes they are on the same server. I designed it to be > modular, the various components can be placed on different systems > with no c...