search for: doabl

...n an instruction %x1 = I1, can I replace the rhs "I1" with "I2" and get a new instruction %x1 = I2? Alternatively, I can add a new instruction %x2 = I2, and replace all uses of %x1 with %x2, and then delete %x1 = I1, but it seems the former is simpler or faster if it's doable. Any suggestion? Neal On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote: > > 3. can I modify a function to take extra formal parameters? can I update > > all calls of the original function to take extra actual paramters? The > > function...

...n  %x1 = I1,  can I replace the rhs "I1"  with  "I2" > and get a new instruction %x1 = I2?   Alternatively, I can add a new > instruction %x2 = I2, and replace all uses of %x1 with %x2, and then delete > %x1 = I1, but it seems the former is simpler or faster if it's doable. Creating a new instruction, replacing all the uses, and deleting the old instruction is the standard procedure; for various reasons, LLVM doesn't allow editing certain aspects of an Instruction. -Eli

> 3.  can I modify a function to take extra formal parameters? can I update > all calls of the original function to take extra actual paramters?  The > function might be called across multiple modules.   It seems this has to be > done at both ModulePass and FunctionPass levels. > Check out DeadArgumentElimination pass. It does opposite of what you want, but you'll get an idea.

Hello - I'd like to encrypt rsync traffic over the wire, and for various reasons, I can't use ssh. I'd like to use SSL. Having spent the last day or so trying to wrap my brain around what that's going to take, I'm wondering if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or another? TIA, -justinb

Hi All, I''d like to use different caching strategies based on the visitor status - anonymous => action caching - logged in => fragment caching Is that doable? Where should I start? TIA Alain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org...

...ant to instrument llvm code to do some run-time monitoring work. After reading some of the llvm documentation, it begins clear to me that I can do the instrumentation in a transformation pass. There are several things I want to do in the transformation pass, but I'm not sure whether they are doable and how to do them even after I read the documentation. I would be very appreciate if anyone can answer my questions or give me hints of how to do them. 1. can I add more global memory objects to a module? any hint how to do it? do I need to derive a pass from ModulePass? 2. can I add more s...

...ode to do some run-time monitoring work. After > reading some of the llvm documentation, it begins clear to me that I > can do the instrumentation in a transformation pass. There are > several things I want to do in the transformation pass, but I'm not > sure whether they are doable and how to do them even after I read the > documentation. I would be very appreciate if anyone can answer my > questions or give me hints of how to do them. > > 1. can I add more global memory objects to a module? any hint how to > do it? do I need to derive a pass from Modul...

...le details, i.e. code, error message, minor message, and details. Right now it does not even include any of those, so it is hard for users to differentiate the error handling depending on the actual error. Also, IMHO failures related to ENOMEM should caml_raise_out_of_memory(). I guess this is not doable anymore, to avoid breaking the ocaml-augeas API? If it is doable, I'm willing to cook up a patch. -- Pino Toscano

Greetings. As part of a new installation of dovecot, we are exploring backup options, and wondered if it's at all possible to define a couple of namespaces where messages get duplicated to be saved in another disk for fast recovery. (we do not intent to load balance between the two, all we would like is to see if it's possible to have duplicate mailboxes so to keep a fast working backup

Good morning, dear listers I am wondering how to do string evaluation such that model <- glm(Y ~ [STRING], data = mydata) where STRING <- "x1 + x2 + x3" It is very doable in other language such as SAS. Thank you so much for your insight!

...of the W10 clients. I expected that the Samba DC would handle the logon, but that didn't work. The logon process just hung there until I fired up the MS DC again. Could not find anything in the client except the GPO messages mentioned above. To conclude this rant, is a mixed environment really doable, or would it just create a lot of issues as times go by? Any advice is welcome! Learning is Living! -- ------ -------------------- 8 ------------------ ------ "A *wise* man once told me - Any idiot can do backups, but it takes a genius to successfully restore" Anders ?stling +46 768...

...in 2009 there was some discussion of the practicality of supporting char sizes greater than 8-bit: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-September/thread.html#6349 http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/thread.html#26025 with the consensus seemingly being "quite doable, please get a good patch and submit". However the current code appears (to my neophyte eyes) to be explicitly 8-bit, e.g. one instance called out in the mail thread remains: /// isString - This method returns true if this is an array of i8. bool ConstantDataSequential::isString() const {...

> Ah OK. I would have loved to have such a tool, but as a non-clang > expert, I can obviously not judge if it is suited. Maybe you are aware > of other projects suitable for GSoC, But still many things in "Use clang libraries to implement better versions of existing tools" are doable as it seems to me. E.g. delta replacement based on clang. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

...n, but that didn't > work. > The logon process just hung there until I fired up the MS DC again. > Could > not find anything in the client except the GPO messages mentioned > above. It should work, perhaps look into DNS? > To conclude this rant, is a mixed environment really doable, or would > it > just create a lot of issues as times go by? Any advice is welcome! It all comes down to why you are doing it. Some folks ran such a setup to work around bugs in our DRS code for Azure AD connect, but I fixed those recently. If there was a specific application I was using,...

> It's definitely doable, but I'd be worried about the maintenance burden. Yes, that is a problem. We are currently not allowed to reveal our target (which has 16-bit bytes, and registers with non-power-of-two bit widths) fully, and therefore not able to submit it upstream. One idea we have toyed with is to create a...

Hi, I need to add switches like -disable-mem2reg, disable-gvn to llvm-ld. Currently CreateStandardLTOPasses takes in only DisableInternalize and DisableInliner switches. Is modifying this API okay for these new switches, or is it doable in some other ways ? - Sanjiv

Is there any way to do this with Samba and LDAP? What I'd like is to be able to, at a minimum, force minimum password length, mixture of letters and numbers, and at least two 'special characters'... Is this doable with Samba using LDAP for authentication? If not, is it doable using other authentication means? Thanks, -- Charles

...segment. llvm-objcopy only does the base p_offset fix. You need to take care p_vaddr/p_paddr/p_filesz/p_memsz by your self. + adding a section smaller than the known lowest address (ET_EXEC with a non-zero image base) or larger than the known largest address: The PT_LOAD fixes are doable. + adding a section within the existing address ranges: this is very difficult due to many implicit inter-section references. If you have an advanced binary rewriting tool, this is still doable, but definitely brittle. File offsets (p_offset,sh_offset) can be reconstructed from ad...

Hi, is there a dovecot feature I did not found yet, which can limit the access to the server to special timeslots like working hours? Or is that a serverside / sssd / auth / pam / account feature? Thanks for hints to some helpfull documentation and sugesstions. Regards . G?tz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type:

...ainers with > pointer-like keys and sorting of elements with the same keys. > > Now, I wanted to add checkers for these (and other types of > non-deterministic behaviors) so that they could be applied more > widely. > I also realize that not all of these may be doable at compile-time. > > With that in mind, I have pushed a patch which I adds a new > category of > checks for non-determinism: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50488. > > The first checker which I have pushed here will simply check if raw > pointers are being sorted...