search for: do_vc_no_ghcb

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:33PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -63,3 +175,45 @@ void __init do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code) > while (true) > asm volatile("hlt\n"); > } > + > +static enum es_result vc_insn_string_read(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt, > + void *src, char *buf, > + unsigned int data_size, > + unsigned int count...

...This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for > them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I > still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols > are? Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing call do_vc_no_ghcb and that's setup in early_idt_setup(). vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e., I don't see it being an IDT entry point. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

...bf88e64e..bd058aa21e4f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S @@ -71,5 +71,6 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(\name) EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_page_fault do_boot_page_fault error_code=1 #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT -EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_stage1_vc do_vc_no_ghcb error_code=1 +EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_stage1_vc do_vc_no_ghcb error_code=1 +EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_stage2_vc do_boot_stage2_vc error_code=1 #endif diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c index 9652d5c2afda..dba49e75095a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/m...

...73bf88e64e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S @@ -69,3 +69,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(\name) .code64 EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_page_fault do_boot_page_fault error_code=1 + +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT +EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_stage1_vc do_vc_no_ghcb error_code=1 +#endif diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h index ea6174bad699..65da40777bc1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h @@ -141,5 +141,6 @@ extern struct desc_ptr boot_idt_desc; /* IDT Entry Points */...

...eb4df478a1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_handlers_64.S @@ -70,3 +70,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(\name) .code64 EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_page_fault do_boot_page_fault error_code=1 + +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT +EXCEPTION_HANDLER boot_stage1_vc do_vc_no_ghcb error_code=1 +#endif diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h index 9840c82a39f1..eaa8b45ebccb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h @@ -141,5 +141,6 @@ extern struct desc_ptr boot_idt_desc; /* IDT Entry Points */...

...e it returns via the + * paravirtualized INTERRUPT_RETURN and pv-ops don't work that early. + */ +SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(vc_no_ghcb) + UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS offset=8 + + /* Build pt_regs */ + PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS + + /* Call C handler */ + movq %rsp, %rdi + movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp), %rsi + call do_vc_no_ghcb + + /* Unwind pt_regs */ + POP_REGS + + /* Remove Error Code */ + addq $8, %rsp + + /* Pure iret required here - don't use INTERRUPT_RETURN */ + iretq +SYM_CODE_END(vc_no_ghcb) +#endif #define SYM_DATA_START_PAGE_ALIGNED(name) \ SYM_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, .balign PAGE_SIZE) -- 2.2...

...e it returns via the + * paravirtualized INTERRUPT_RETURN and pv-ops don't work that early. + */ +SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(vc_no_ghcb) + UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS offset=8 + + /* Build pt_regs */ + PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS + + /* Call C handler */ + movq %rsp, %rdi + movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp), %rsi + call do_vc_no_ghcb + + /* Unwind pt_regs */ + POP_REGS + + /* Remove Error Code */ + addq $8, %rsp + + /* Pure iret required here - don't use INTERRUPT_RETURN */ + iretq +SYM_CODE_END(vc_no_ghcb) +#endif #define SYM_DATA_START_PAGE_ALIGNED(name) \ SYM_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, .balign PAGE_SIZE) diff --...

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > index b2cbcd40b52e..e1ed963a57ec 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > @@ -74,5 +74,6 @@ static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) > } > > extern void vc_no_ghcb(void);

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > index b2cbcd40b52e..e1ed963a57ec 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > @@ -74,5 +74,6 @@ static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) > } > > extern void vc_no_ghcb(void);

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by