search for: do_stuff

I''ve got a question about how variables are made available to templates. We have a test that looks something like this: def test_variable_assigned xhr :get, :do_stuff, :id => 1 assert_not_nil assigns(:thing) end And our app code looks like this: class SuperClass < ActionController def do_stuff @parent_model = ParentModel.find(params[:id]) render :template => ''superclass/do_stuff'' end end class SubClass < SuperC...

...r hidden as soon as the button is pressed to avoid having it possibly get pressed again ( sometimes the rails response is slow enough for a user to think they need to re-press it ). example: <div id="form_container"> <%= form_remote_tag :url => { :action => ''do_stuff'', :id => @stuff.id } %> <%= hidden_field_tag "info", @info %> <%= text_field_tag "input_here", "0", :size => ''5'' %> <input type="submit" value="DO_STUFF"> </form> </div> --- How...

Is it possible to have more than one kind of view for a specific action, for example an .rhtml and a .rjs file to handle the view for the same action? I suspect not, but this makes me wonder if there a way to call the .rjs file from within the .rhtml so the statements within it get executed? Thanks, Andy

...emails got me thinking about inlining. >> >> I say this function is always well defined, >> And it always executes statement S >> >> F(a) >> { >> If (a == a) S; >> } >> > I think the problem can be seen as: void F(int a) { if (a == a) do_stuff(); } .... main() { int x; F(x); } If the compiler doesn't inline F, it will definitely call F, where the compiler doesn't KNOW that x is undef, and as a result, do_stuff is guaranteed to execute. If F is inlned, x is known as undef, so the compiler decides that the comparison is f...

Is it possible to declare an instance variable in a controller that is available to every action without defining the variable in every action? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...well. Each foo partial makes use of a variable inside called ''foo'' (and can get foo.id etc). After all the partials are loaded, I need to :update a div corresponding to one of the partials (ie re-load the partial in that div). I do this via a link_to_remote call, calling the do_stuff method in a controller. The do_stuff method attempts to render the foo partial back, passing it a variable like so: render_partial ''something/foo'', nil, ''foo'' => Foo.find(params[:foo]) This code complains that foo is null when it renders back, however, if...

...(address_space(2))) char mem2[100]; Now, we are using a function which reads a value from one of these memories and does some processing. Since we want to execute this function for multiple memories, we make it accept a pointer in the generic address space (ie, no address space attribute): void do_stuff(char* mem); Somewhere later on, we call the function as follows: do_stuff(mem1); ... do_stuff(mem2); As expected, the LLVM IR resulting from this contains a bitcast to remove the address space from mem1 and mem2 (and also cast from [100 x i8] to i8*, but that is less interesting). Now, this b...

Hi all, Is there a way to invoke validations at times other than save, create and update? I know that I can do this by writing my own validation checks using errors.add_[blah], but I''d like to leverage the existing validation code. What I have is two sets of fields in a record, set A and set B. Both sets must be validated on record create. However, the trouble is that after

Hi All, I've been fiddling around with a DenseMap to store cached copies of some result. In short, I'm doing the following: It = Map.find(Key) if (It != Map.end() && It->second != Unknown) Return It->second; // do_stuff return Map[Key] = Result; However, I this requires two lookups in the hash table, which is not so nice. Currently, there is no way to write this down so you only do one lookup. Intuitively, you'd write: ValueT &Value = Map[Key]; if (Value != Unknown) return Value; // do_stuff return V...

hi, i want to make a behavior shared between models, the examples need to create new instances etc. Is there a way to pass the model class to the shared behavior? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071218/5b400cc5/attachment-0001.html

...as an edge case that won''t happen every time the worker is invoked. As of now, I''ve just added some basic exception handling to log the error for future inspection like so: class EmailWorker < BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker set_worker_name :email_worker def run(data = nil) do_stuff rescue Exception => ex logger.info ex end end Is this generally the practice for doing exception handling within workers or is there another approach? Regards, Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/back...

hi people I don''t know much about ajax - jquery. And right now I need to use some functionality with them. In a form (sales model) I have the following code: <div> <%= f.label :product_id, "Product" %> <%= f.collection_select( :product_id, Product.all, :id, :name, options={} ) %> </div> <div> <%= f.label :price,

...ly happening a) in the test environment, and b) when there is a fixture file for that table. The test below only prints "Doing stuff" one time if I remove the ''fixtures'' line. Likewise, saving the item through ./script/console in development mode also does not call the do_stuff method twice. I''m inclined to think that this is a bug in the handling of fixtures, but I''d love to be proven wrong. I couldn''t find this in trac, but if there''s an open ticket, then I''d like to know about it. If not, and if everyone agrees that this...

I have a habtm relationship between two models. What I want to do is find items that aren''t related. So like if you had authors <-> posts, how would you find authors who don''t have any posts? Or posts that don''t have an author ? Thanks, Alex Strand [astrand@razorcom.com] Razorcom www.razorcom.com

...o exclude it for 10.9.8.7. Is there a ''special'' hiera value I can set in 10.9.8.7.json to stop the search falling down into default.json ? At the minute we''ve set an empty string, but then templates etc. need to be littered with if ($url_from_hiera != "") { do_stuff() } which feels like the sort of ''magic variable'' that will bite future me in the ass in around 6 months. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i...

Nuno, One of your recent emails got me thinking about inlining. I say this function is always well defined, And it always executes statement S F(a) { If (a == a) S; } And that if this function is inlined it must still be well defined, And still always execute statement S But if I read your example correctly you feel that the result of inlining is undefined behavior because “if

...n, this would be a useful thing. in llvm from svn an "unwind" instruction is mapped to a call to _Unwind_Resume. This is no good for throwing a new dwarf exception, but it does mean that you can now implement cleanups as: invoke XYZ to label %normal unwind label %cleanup cleanup: do_stuff unwind Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, I have a long worker process I want to capture the output as dynamically as possible and send it to the client. I do the following currently: class SvnWorker < Worker::Base def do_stuff(args) tmp = [] my_project = args[:repo] # Import the contents of a 20 Meg project into a bare bones svn repo. import_status = `svn import #{path_to_extracted_zipdir} file://#{my_project}` tmp = import_status results[:response] = tmp end def status results[:response] end end This o...

I''m having a heck of a time with this. Basically I want to write a custom function that returns a value to the file content type. Ex: file { /blah: content => do_stuff(option) } I looked at the wiki posting but just haven''t been able to figure out how to make this work. The first error that I get when I try to actually use ''return'' is: "return can''t jump across threads" Ok, so I take away the return and get &quot...

...the "same time"? It doesn''t seem reliable according to my tests - but maybe I am doing something wrong. If I do: def test_starling FooWorker.asynch_foo_test(:my_id => ''foo'') temp = [] for i in 1..1000 temp << Thread.new(i) {|random_value| do_stuff(random_value)} end temp.each do |t| t.join end end def do_stuff(lvalue) starling = Starling.new(''localhost:22122'') starling.set(''foo'', :rvalue => lvalue) end # In FooWorker: def foo_test(options) starling = Starling.new(''localhost:...