search for: do_setlink_notify

...ange but the tx_queue_len can also be changed via rtnetlink as well. So we need another patch for that path right? if (tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]) { unsigned long value = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]); if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; dev->tx_queue_len = value; } Thanks, John

...ange but the tx_queue_len can also be changed via rtnetlink as well. So we need another patch for that path right? if (tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]) { unsigned long value = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]); if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; dev->tx_queue_len = value; } Thanks, John

...ll. So we need another patch for >> that path right? >> >> if (tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]) { >> unsigned long value = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]); >> >> if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) >> status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; >> >> dev->tx_queue_len = value; >> } >> >> Thanks, >> John >> > > Right, will do this in next version. > > Thanks Ok, since Michael has acked on the series, will prepare a patch on top. Thanks

...ll. So we need another patch for >> that path right? >> >> if (tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]) { >> unsigned long value = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]); >> >> if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) >> status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; >> >> dev->tx_queue_len = value; >> } >> >> Thanks, >> John >> > > Right, will do this in next version. > > Thanks Ok, since Michael has acked on the series, will prepare a patch on top. Thanks

...changed via rtnetlink as well. So we need another patch for > that path right? > > if (tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]) { > unsigned long value = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_TXQLEN]); > > if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) > status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; > > dev->tx_queue_len = value; > } > > Thanks, > John > Right, will do this in next version. Thanks

...v->tx_queue_len; + + if (dev->tx_queue_len ^ value) { + dev->tx_queue_len = value; + err = call_netdevice_notifiers( + NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN, dev); + err = notifier_to_errno(err); + if (err) { + dev->tx_queue_len = orig_len; + goto errout; + } status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY; - - dev->tx_queue_len = value; + } } if (tb[IFLA_OPERSTATE]) -- 2.7.4

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the