search for: do_report

...39;'t seem quite "Rails". I created two methods in a controller, one called "report" that was empty: def report end that would just then display the report.rhtml page. This page contained a form tag with a text box and a submit button. This form then submitted to a "do_report" method in the controller: def do_report teams = ..... etc end This then displayed a do_report.rhtml which formatted the output. I thought I would try to streamline it a bit, and moved the code in do_report into the report method, and had the and had the form submit directly to the "...

...eo do xml.id @video_id xml.views @views xml.date(@date.to_s) if @date end I''d like to mock it, rather than asserting that the XML is the right string. I can do one spec: specify "should create a video tag" do @mock_builder.should_receive(:video) do_report end but I can''t do anything else. Setting an expectation for :id, :views, and :date all fail. It''s obvious to me why it does...the stubbed :video method doesn''t know to execute the stuff in the block. So what''s the best way to spec this? Pat

...rocess_pdf(user) thread_pool.defer(user) do |user| makepdf(user) end end My question is: I use a mutex to handle synchronizing the register_status. This works fine: def makepdf(user) txt = user.to_s + " started" save_status(user, :progress, txt) do_report(user) txt = user.to_s + " ended" save_status(user, :progress, txt) end def save_status(user_id,key,data) @status_mutex.synchronize do @worker_status[user_id] = { :key => key, :data => data} end register_status(@worker_status) end However,...

I have hinted in the past of wanting to go to a more selective control of the output of rsync. Here it is. PROBLEMS with the existing --verbose et al. The simple incrementing verbose doesn't allow one to restrict stdout to what actually is of interest. For instance inside dirvish i don't care about directories, or any kind of non-regular file because they show up every time even if