Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "do_b".
Did you mean:
do_
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
On 3 October 2012 06:17, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> As I've stated, whether the metadata is preserved is not really the
>> relevant metric. It is fine for a pass that does not understand
>> parallelization metadata to drop it. The important part is that dropping
>>
2012 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> As I've stated, whether the metadata is preserved is not really the
> relevant metric. It is fine for a pass that does not understand
> parallelization metadata to drop it. The important part is that dropping
> the metadata, and moving instructions to which that metadata is
> attached, must not cause