search for: do_b

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "do_b".

Did you mean: do_
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
On 3 October 2012 06:17, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> As I've stated, whether the metadata is preserved is not really the >> relevant metric. It is fine for a pass that does not understand >> parallelization metadata to drop it. The important part is that dropping >>
2012 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > As I've stated, whether the metadata is preserved is not really the > relevant metric. It is fine for a pass that does not understand > parallelization metadata to drop it. The important part is that dropping > the metadata, and moving instructions to which that metadata is > attached, must not cause