search for: do4

...that in LARTC HOW-TO: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html "Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the root!" Can anyone provide a hint if this limitation is true (I did not research it myself) and if it''s true, what is the origin of this exception? -- DO4-UANIC

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hi all, I have two identical linux boxes (A e B), each one with two interfaces: an ethernet (eth0 with ip 192.168.1.50) and an hdlc (hdlc0). The two boxes are only connected via a link through their hdlc interfaces. Because they have to be exactly the same, if I have to assign an ip address to hdlc0 of A then the hdlc0 of B should have the same ip address. Each one should have a default

http://lartc.org/ Forbidden You don''t have permission to access / on this server. Apache/1.3.33 Server at lartc.org Port 80 -- DO4-UANIC

Hi I''m trying to understand this qdisc stats output: #tc -s qdisc ls dev [interface] [..] qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 13 direct_packets_stat 38 Sent 3867654734 bytes 7023775 pkt (dropped 4, overlimits 4852340 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 11p requeues 0 [..] In all my qdiscs, I''ve got "rate 0bit". What does it mean ? As you can see, there is some traffic

Hi all: I have this network diagram:<?view=page&name=gp&ver=3403410b768567d8#> FRAME RELAY CLOUD<------------>CISCO-ROUTER <-------LAN------->ROUTER-LINUX<---------LAN------------>>> Between the CISCO and the LINUX routers there is a small LAN (+-5 IP''s). My question is, if I QOS the traffic on the LINUX-ROUTER going out from the LAN towards the

Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or vice versa) in iptables? I''m getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with U32? TIA, Edwin -- <=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=> Edwin Whitelaw, P.E. New River

Hello Routing Gurus ;-) I''d like to know if it''s possible to make a routing decision for pakets originating from a specific port of the local machine without using ipfilter/iptables to mark the pakets. I read about the tc filter stuff but that seems only to be able to sort the pakets to a different queue on the same interface and not choose a different interface for example. Is

Hello, I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03) network adapters ( ETH0, ETH1 and ETH2). Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND having advanced routing running it. I Did the same

I''ll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See: http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same

Hi! I built some rules to shape traffic from my linux router in both dirrections: to the Internet and to the LAN. When i apply the rules my computer cannot acces the Internet or the LAN. Is this behavior normal? Do I need to write some rules for local IPs of my router? (I have sevaral, both on the internal and the external NICs.) Thank you for any advice! Sorin.

Hi, I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the lartc.org site: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil 80mbit burst 19k tc class add dev eth0

Hello, Ive had a poke around through various linux routing documents, but haven''t found what I think is an elegant solution to a routing issue I''m having with a hosting provider and RHEL ES 4 running in a VMware VM. Here''s a diagram of the situation : Default route at provider our host (A) 72.3.230.1/26 ---- 72.3.230.30/26 the VM (B)

Hello, the following patches should get multidisk access working. The syntax accepted is the following: (hdx,y)/path/to/file where x is the disk number and start at 0 and the y is the partition number starting at 1. So (hd0,1) is the first partition of the first disk. the other accepted syntax is using MBR's 32 bits disk signature so for example: (mbr:0x12345678,2)/foo/bar would address

...maz3D<xs(ekG;!Q>8 zddxsqq+Y7{ND9wwSw)|JJ?mYd8Ee91xP5HQ1u?wb_h3tMmD$SeTWr(X*irmk`2jwN z&XLVvb>WA9e&0NV%sA%cX<n7Pui7T!{9p;o2U6iLf>nRNxDO{4Gk-eya(P(}qw{?( zi>xLuoI#k-&~xh1AO^Tb=Zt6F!i;}~Fo9BuXGBF;p}gE3bFuv`j<S{^G0J>#Jce3@ z%C$u9@XHWt>y0OrYKy`!z%F-ma1bJrn<E~HNv~Do4~&FBnik%H`D?t%8@&RMezsv% z7#td!zjXHUV&-MC-q+U$C-3Sy2m_W!jf$c?VkgRgijN;f9Z^uwHWl1D7;RlxWyX3| zRYtqD-^+VOB$*)oOPIJypNW1UY1X_a>pBoTO5r0I@DvNFDu8%jG1=96AM)~H)h98L z3X;jHev~l_r`(M429S&k^kz615lH&bG3H(*)n`mI#vDkqATbVAD=)ZiBtZO?9>88( zqZ+(RKqMQcIHp_4@iWSg8OHmPv`@Wt8m8bb-N)aOR+dQkxA...