search for: dnszones

Good morning Stefan. Your welkom. I see everything worked out now. Great !! Well done, you made it happen. :-) What i suggest now, at least these are the steps i always do to make sure the DC's are having a exact same setup. First, i clear all my logs and reboot one server. Wait 15-30 min, then go through all you logs, fix every warning/error. Make it perfect. Reboot again, repeat

On 17/11/2020 16:19, Mani Wieser via samba wrote: > ldbdel is definitely not the right tool: it will delete both records > > lddsearch: returned 2 records, because the dn is exactly the same Didn't think you could have two records with the same DN, if this is true, then it does sound like a bug, care to share the two DN's ? Rowland

Hello, I'm running Samba 4.9.5 as domain member, when I bring down the current Window DC (10.50.50.187) the winbind seems to hang instead of switching to the other available DC (10.50.50.25) The "net ads" command show that Samba switched to the other available DC: net ads join -U 'administrator' -S 'PAVONE.HYPERFILE.LOCAL' 'HYPERFILE.LOCAL'^C root at

It looks like the original intention in our code was to be able to add/modify records with the "." zone. Trying it, there seems to be other issues with using it. I'm not entirely sure if this alias is valid against Windows or for which calls. I just hacked a patch (see attached) to see if I could add or modify another name server. samba-tool dns add $DC_SERVER . @ NS testing

...am.ldb and i think the rights of sam.ldb.d directory are correct. -rw------- 1 root root 16M Apr 2 17:29 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 10M Apr 2 17:29 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 26M Apr 2 17:28 DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 4,1M Apr 2 17:28 DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 65M Apr 2 17:29 DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 412K Apr 2 14:46 metadata.tdb Regards, Karl Heinz -- Am 02.04.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Marc M...

...> database > "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; > > and i get following errors: > > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: > No such Base DN: > DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=de > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_trace_response: DONE > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: error: 32 > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: msg: No such Base DN: > DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=de >...

Hi, There is no record for the forest: ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b 'CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=empresa,DC=com,DC=br' -s sub '(&(objectclass=dnsZone)(dc=_msdcs.empresa.com.br))' # returned 0 records # 0 entries # 0 referrals Can I fix this? Regards, M?rcio Bacci Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 ?s 06:40, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: >...

...y link to DLZ issues. > > The system definitely has DLZ included. Otherwise it could not produce > DLZ related errors and change behaviour, if sam.ldb is changes. > > Using some hints from bind-users I found > > ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > "DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ad,DC=microsult,DC=de" "(objectClass=dnsZone)" dn > > a useful command. It showed me that I added the wrong zones and that the > zones claimed to have missing SOA and NS are actually there. To cite the > most important parts of the logs: > > Dec 29 20:24:26 verda...

This seems to be just a stub with 3 READMEs? # locate bind-sdb /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4 /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/INSTALL.ldap /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.ldap /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.sdb_pgsql Unless it is putting files elsewhere. These readmes are dated long ago. What is really needed and where is any good documentation for using this? thanks

...llo Marc I change the loglevel to 10 database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; and i get following errors: 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: No such Base DN: DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=de 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_trace_response: DONE 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: error: 32 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: msg: No such Base DN: DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=de 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389...

...indows or for which calls. The zone is definitely called 'RootDNSServers' not '.' If something looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck. The object in AD for 'RootDNSServers' looks like a zone record, it is in 'CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com' and it has the 'objectClass' dnsZone, therefore it is a zone. Samba needs to see this zone before we can even think about updating/changing the root records. What is the difference between: DC=devstation,DC=samdom.example.com,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZ...

This is strange and should not happen. Verify if all DC's are also available as NS record in the DNS on the zones. Startup the DNS tool. Goto you primary dnszone ( and repeat for all other zones ) Do you see all your DC's as NS record in the zone, then its ok, if not.. Klik and Properties on the zone, goto Tab "Nameservers", add the other dc's. You can also try

your are right: it has the name two times in the dn server1:/var/log# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ad,DC=horn '(dc=ad.horn)' # record 1 dn: DC=ad.horn,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ad,DC=horn objectClass: top objectClass: dnsZone instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20200708143747.0Z uSNCreated: 13579 showInAdvancedViewOnly: TRUE name: ad.horn objectGUID: 65596d8b-5b3d-4682-865c-b98bcd...

...this 192.168.200.1.1 PTR test.gsg.local Good thing the record can be deleted but i guess it should not be possible to create such an record. Beside that the DNS Remote Management shows alot of grey folders labled with machine names on Forward Lookup Zones. Folders like _sites, ForestZones, DnsZones are also affected. Is this normal behaviour or should i be concerned about this. Thanks in advance Achim Gottinger

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 1 augustus 2019 12:30 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO issues - getting SYSVOL cleaned up again > > Am 01.08.19 um 09:13 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Good morning Stefan. >

...; "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; >> >> and i get following errors: >> >> 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: >> No such Base DN: >> DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=de >> 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_trace_response: DONE >> 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: error: 32 >> 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: msg: No such Base DN: >> DC=client008.my.domain.de,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=my,DC=do...

...palName, > duplicate of objectGUID be74c1a9-d80b-4922-90f5-94a8c86632ad in > @INDEX:SERVICEPRINCIPALNAME:TERMSRV/COMP0013.EMPRESA.COM.BR > Replicated 286 objects (1066 linked attributes) for empresa.com.br > Done with always replicated NC (base, config, schema) > Replicating DC=DomainDnsZones,empresa.com.br > Partition[DC=DomainDnsZones,empresa.com.br] objects[402/692] > linked_values[0/0] > Replicated 402 objects (0 linked attributes) for DC=DomainDnsZones, > empresa.com.br > Partition[DC=DomainDnsZones,empresa.com.br] objects[692/692] > linked_values[0/0] > Replic...

On 10/02/16 11:20, mathias dufresne wrote: > Another question: > 6° In DNS zone _msdcs, at root, there is one DNS record per DC. These > records are those which have to create manually and are rlated to > objectGuid as explained there: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins#Resolve_the_objectGUID_CNAME_record_of_the_new_joined_Domain_Controller >

...aining to recursion does not easily link to DLZ issues. The system definitely has DLZ included. Otherwise it could not produce DLZ related errors and change behaviour, if sam.ldb is changes. Using some hints from bind-users I found ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ad,DC=microsult,DC=de" "(objectClass=dnsZone)" dn a useful command. It showed me that I added the wrong zones and that the zones claimed to have missing SOA and NS are actually there. To cite the most important parts of the logs: Dec 29 20:24:26 verdandi named[3695]: samba_dlz...

...v7hl is obsoleted by > 99:sernet-samba-ad-4.2.3-18.el.armv7hl which is already installed > > So it is already there thanks to sernet. > > # ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb --cross-ncs "(DC=home.htt)" > # record 1 > dn: DC=home.htt,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=home,DC=htt > objectClass: top > objectClass: dnsZone > instanceType: 4 > whenCreated: 20150827220723.0Z > whenChanged: 20150827220723.0Z > uSNCreated: 3656 > uSNChanged: 3656 > showInAdvancedViewOnly: TRUE > name: home.htt > objectGUID: 34b4ec5b-bfd2-42e0-96df-c5b1...