Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dn387583".
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
__has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this
is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
...fined(_MSC_VER)
>>
>> Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
>> we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
>>
>
> MSDN claims that VS2013 supports braced initializer list syntax:
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn387583.aspx
>
>>
>> The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this
>> is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it
>> should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for
>> quite a while now.
I t...