search for: dn387583

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dn387583".

2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER) Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that? The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
...fined(_MSC_VER) >> >> Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that >> we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that? >> > > MSDN claims that VS2013 supports braced initializer list syntax: > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn387583.aspx > >> >> The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this >> is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it >> should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for >> quite a while now. I t...