Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dn1".
Did you mean:
dn
2001 May 11
1
lsoda
...he previous time step's
values of y and the parms. Any help?
Also, any rule of thumb advice regarding rtol and atol would be appreciated.
p <- c(r1=.01, r2=.01, a12=0.5, a21=0.6, k1=1,k2=1)
t <- 1:20
lvcomp2 <- function(y, t, p)
{ # Lotka - Volterra model of two competing populations
dN1.dt <- p["r1"] * y[1] * (1-(y[1] + p["a12"]*y[2])/p["k1"])
dN2.dt <- p["r2"] * y[2] * (1-(y[2] + p["a21"]*y[1])/p["k2"])
list(c(dN1.dt,dN2.dt),c(???))
}
outlv <- lsoda(c(.1,.1),t, lvcomp2, p,rtol=1e-4, atol=1e-6)
outlv
TIA,
Henry...
2012 Sep 20
3
(no subject)
>From my book on corpus linguistics with R:
# (10) Imagine you have two vectors a and b such that
a<-c("d", "d", "j", "f", "e", "g", "f", "f", "i", "g")
b<-c("a", "g", "d", "f", "g", "a", "f", "a",
2003 Sep 15
1
Anyone using National ISDN (NI-1) BRI under Linux?
I have a North American BRI configured as National ISDN (NI-1) on an
SBC (Nortel?) switch. SBC calls this "FastTrak ISDN", and it's
surprisingly inexpensive -- less than two POTS lines.
I've been trying to find an inexpensive PCI interface solution to
connect this to Asterisk as voice lines. I prefer ISDN BRI over POTS
lines because of the improved signalling, fast dialing,
2007 Jul 25
3
aggregate.ts
Consider the following scrap of code:
> x<- ts(1:50,start=c(1,11),freq=12)
> y <- aggregate(x,nfreq=4)
> c(y)
[1] 6 15 24 33 42 51 60 69 78 87 96 105 114 123 132 141
> y
Error in rep.int("", start.pad) : invalid number of copies in rep.int()
> tsp(y)
[1] 1.833333 5.583333 4.000000
So we can aggregate into quarters, but we cannot print it using
2007 Jul 25
3
aggregate.ts
Consider the following scrap of code:
> x<- ts(1:50,start=c(1,11),freq=12)
> y <- aggregate(x,nfreq=4)
> c(y)
[1] 6 15 24 33 42 51 60 69 78 87 96 105 114 123 132 141
> y
Error in rep.int("", start.pad) : invalid number of copies in rep.int()
> tsp(y)
[1] 1.833333 5.583333 4.000000
So we can aggregate into quarters, but we cannot print it using
2019 May 10
0
[R] approx with NAs --> new argument 'na.rm=TRUE' ?!
...ction(na.)
+ approx(xn, yn, xout=xout, method=M, rule=R, na.rm=na.)$y),
+ simplify="array")
+ }, simplify="array")
> names(dimnames(ry)) <- c("x = ", "na.rm", "method", "rule")
> dimnames(ry)[[1]] <- dn1 <- format(xout)
> ftable(aperm(ry, 4:1)) # --> (4 * 2 * 2) x length(xout) = 16 x 9 matrix
x = 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
rule method na.rm
N constant TRUE NA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 NA
F...
2019 May 08
3
[R] approx with NAs --> new argument 'na.rm=TRUE' ?!
>>>>> Robert Almgren
>>>>> on Fri, 3 May 2019 15:45:44 -0400 writes
[ __ to R-help __ -- here diverted to R-devel on purpose]
> There is something I do not think is right in the approx()
> function in base R, with method="constant" and in the
> presence of NA values. I have 3.6.0, but the behavior
> seems to be the same in
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking