search for: dmitri

*** BLURB HERE *** Bean Huo (5): fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write fs/buffer.c: convert block_commit_write to return void ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() udf: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/buffer.c | 24 +++++++-----------------

Remove our (soon to be) bouncing email addresses, and update Dmitri's address. Dmitry will take over as maintainer for CAIF from now on. Cc: Vikram Arv <vikram.arv at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at lockless.no> Signed-off-by: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandela...

Remove our (soon to be) bouncing email addresses, and update Dmitri's address. Dmitry will take over as maintainer for CAIF from now on. Cc: Vikram Arv <vikram.arv at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at lockless.no> Signed-off-by: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandela...

...designate the register into it's own register class and have your instruction write to that class (and there will be only a single option for RA). cheers, Sam Sam Parker Research Student Electronic Systems Design Group Loughborough University UK ________________________________________ From: Dmitri Kovalenko [dmitri.a.kovalenko at gmail.com] Sent: 31 August 2014 21:53 To: Sam Parker Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] understanding DAG: node creation Sam, thanks for your answer. That's a great suggestion. And excuse me for maybe dilettante question: To hard-code use of the...

...ow much about scheduling, do you want to post your instruction definitions again to see if someone else has some ideas,. cheers, sam Sam Parker Research Student Electronic System Design Group School of Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering Loughborough University UK On 01/09/14 14:35, Dmitri Kovalenko wrote: > Before I wrote here, I tried both ways you decsribed, but none of them > has worked out for me. > With yours sugesstions I was able to move a bit further with the first > approach (when we don't create regclass and just hard-code it in .td) > > But I still...

...last resort. As mentioned, creating a package C with all the common functions could also be an option, but this strategy quickly inflates the number of packages on CRAN. If no other option is possible, that could be the way but I was still thinking about a more direct solution if possible. Best, Dmitri On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Thierry Onkelinx <thierry.onkelinx at inbo.be> wrote: > Dear Dmitri, > > If it's only a small number of functions then move them the relevant > functions for A to B so that B works without A. Then Import these functions > from B in A. Hence...

Hi Dmitri, If you have such a simple intrinsic which operates on a single register, just lower the intrinsic to a target specific node which is only implemented by a single instruction. Like you were doing before and by using a chain operand. Hard code the instruction to use and define the global register...

Nadav, You are absolutely right, it's ISPC workload. I've checked SSE4 and it's also severely affected. We use intrinsics only for conversion <N x i32> <=> i32, i.e. movmsk.ps. For the rest we use general LLVM instructions. And I actually would really like to stick this way. We rely on LLVM's ability to produce efficient code from general LLVM IR. Relying on

Hello, JFYI so that no work will be duplicated. My colleagues and I will take care of converting the rest of the documentation to rst. Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

@Dmitry, you may get more traction by reporting this issue (with patch) at https://www.openssh.com/report.html . It can also help other folks who may be encountering the same issue. -- jmk > On Mar 3, 2023, at 02:10, Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs at redhat.com> wrote: > > ?Dear colleagues, > > Could you please take a look? > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:55?PM

...;t know either (for the moment). It's all in the design phase still. Generally, I would also like to keep specific functions in specific packages, if at all possible. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark van der Loo <mark.vanderloo at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I'm not saying that Dmitri _should_ do it. I merely mention it as an > option that I think is worth thinking about -- it is easy to overlook the > obvious :-). Since we have no further info on the package's structure we > can't be sure.. > > > > > Op vr 8 apr. 2016 om 13:59 schreef Adrian Du?a...

...39;t see how to separate those functions from their main packages and create a third one that each would depend on. This is just an example, there could be others as well, reason for which I am (still) looking for a solution to: - preserve the current functionalities in packages A and B (to follow Dmitri's original post) - be able to use functions from each other - yet avoid circular dependency I hope this explains it, Adrian On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Mark van der Loo <mark.vanderloo at gmail.com> wrote: > At the risk of stating the over-obvious: there's also the option...

...than "Re: Contents of R-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [PATCH] fix CHECK_this_length in sprintf.c (Matthew Fowles Kulukundis) 2. Re: (no) circular dependency (Adrian Du?a) 3. Re: (no) circular dependency (Mark van der Loo) 4. Re: (no) circular dependency (Dmitri Popavenko) 5. Re: (no) circular dependency (Gabriel Becker) 6. PR# for match.arg(arg) (Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono) 7. Re: (no) circular dependency (Gregory Warnes) 8. Re: Under Windows, Rgui and Rterm crash if one tries to close the graphic device while identify or locator ar...

Hi Dmitry, ISPC does some instruction selection as part of vectorization (on ASTs!) by placing intrinsics for specific operations. The SEXT to i32 pattern was implemented because LLVM did not support vector-selects when this code was written. Can you submit a small SSE4 test case that demonstrates the problem? Select is the canonical form of this operations, and SEXT is usually more

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Grib...

...laces to put temporary files, the right place to put them is alongside the other test outputs in the test output "sandbox" directory. Somewhat orthogonal, but we should also fix up lit to purge those sandboxes before it starts a new test run. - Daniel On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM,...

...unctionality from your package A that *does depend on* *B*, and gets the > rest from package *a* > > Users, then would only ever install or load B and UserFacingA. They > wouldn't need to care much,if at all, about package a. > > ~G > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Dmitri Popavenko <dmitri.popavenko at gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Thanks all, I don't know either (for the moment). >> It's all in the design phase still. Generally, I would also like to keep >> specific functions in specific packages, if at all possible. >> >...

Seems to be broken in the current SVN: [...] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -I../include -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -I/usr/include/hal -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -DNETSNMP_USE_INLINE -Wall -Dlinux -I. -I/usr/include -O2 -Wall -Wsign-compare -s -o energizerups energizerups.o ../common/upsconf.o ../common/parseconf.o ../common/state.o main.o dstate.o

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:32...

Hi all, I'm primarily a hardware person but would like to do some compiler-architecture co-design research. Are there any good references for the NVPTX backend? I'd like to change that backend to have a limited number of physical registers rather than an unlimited number of virtual ones (for more realistic modeling in a uarch simulator). Being able to do register allocation and other