search for: dmarc_moderaction_act

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > A first message came through, > > A first message from yahoo.com ( http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-January/023060.html ) > did arive at my e-mail server, _without_ modified 'From:', _without_

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

( previous thread at http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-January/023050.html ) > > <info from="web interface mailman" extra_from="backend mailinglist software"> > dmarc_moderation_action Option > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > >

...gt; DMARC rules if you are going to do things on mailing lists. > > - John 'Warthog9' Hawley John, thanks once again on that link. I've been reading it and one it links to. http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DMARC It appears the easiest alternative might be to use something like dmarc_moderaction_action set to Munge. This appears to be a system-wide setting with per-list override options. The result would be that if a sender's DMARC policy is p=reject (and optionally p=quarantine), manipulate the FROM/ReplyTo headers to be more "DMARC friendly". -- -Gene

On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>>>> [ ... Failed to