Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dlz_minim".
Did you mean:
dlz_minimal
2012 Aug 22
2
Samba4 successful deployment
I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK.
As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's
advice:
to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in
/samba-master/source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h
/*#ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1
#else
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2
#endif
*/
#define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2
I commented the first block and then added the second block explicitly to
avoid a message complaining about DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION.
GPOs seem to be working OK.
DNS se...
2011 Dec 11
1
Bind9 dlopen version
Hey guys,
I'm currently using Ubuntu 10.04 for setting up Samba4 and I'm having a problem with the dlz_dlopen driver.
I've installed Bind9 from hauke (https://launchpad.net/~hauke/+archive/bind9) because the bind9 version from the apt-get didn't give me the correct version.
I've included the /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf file in my /etc/bind/named.conf, but on starting
2013 Jun 03
1
Removed bind 9.8 installed bind 9.9 now named will not start with samba include statement: dlz_bind9_9.so incorrect version 2 should be 1!?
I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source,
and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from
bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with
the include line for samba in /etc/named.conf:
get: "dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 2 should be 1 in
'/usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so'"
Help!
2016 Jul 26
2
bind 9.11.b2 with samba 4.4.5
i want to use bind 9.11beta2 version.
I do not see bind9_11.so
Best regards
cat /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf
# This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support.
#
# This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file
#
# For example with
# include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";
#
# This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ)
2016 Aug 01
2
Bind on non-DC host (formerly: bind 9.11.b2 with samba 4.4.5)
...hy that would not be an option?
2016-08-01 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>:
> On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 10:34 +0200, mathias dufresne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did you tried to use the bind9_10 library? Did it worked?
>
> If not, the changes to the dlz_minimal.h and the code to match the .h
> from BIND are normally trivial
>
> > If it does not work you should be able to replace this library (which
> > do
> > not need configuration) by one shipped with your Bind package. This
> > one
> > will need configuration to kno...