search for: dlz_bind9

..., I added include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; to /etc/named.conf (the last line) The logs give: 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library '/usr/local/samba/modules/bind9/dlz_bind9.so' - /usr/local/samba/modules/bind. . .no such file. . . 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: dlz_dlopen of 'AD DNS Zone' failed 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: SDLZ driver failed to load. 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: DLZ driver failed to load. 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: loading configuration: fai...

...g session key for dynamic DNS Feb 4 20:11:10 vm1 named[22249]: sizing zone task pool based on 5 zones Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 1 should be 2 in '/usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9.so' Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: dlz_dlopen of 'AD DNS Zone' failed Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: SDLZ driver failed to load. Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: DLZ driver failed to load. Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[22249]: loading configuration: failure Feb 4 20:11:11 vm1 named[...

Hi, I just did a new provision of my samba domain and now the formerly working bind 9.10 + dlz setup does no longer work. When trying to start bind9 it quits with the following error: named[5818]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=mydomain,DC=de named[5818]: samba_dlz: starting configure named[5818]: dns_rdata_fromtext: buffer-0x7f9bc9231ec0:1: near 'srv2..': empty label named[5818]: Failed

...# include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; }; And my bind is 9.9.4-18 Of course if I comment out this include, forwarding is not working so...

No, I'm reading the dlz_bind9.c code. I've found and fixed the problem. It turns out that using a reference counted singleton is a bad idea. The singleton is defunct after reload. If we simply create a new state object and destroy the old one as bind is trying to let us do, things work out fine. This works, at least, for...

...d9 status May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: sizing zone task pool based on 5 zones May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9$ May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: dlz_dlopen of 'AD DNS Zone' failed May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: SDLZ driver failed to load. May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: DLZ driver failed to load. May 04 13:50:40 server5-new named[2079]: loading configuration: failure May 0...

...;> # >> # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema >> # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version >> # >> dlz "AD DNS Zone" { >> # For BIND 9.8.x >> # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; >> >> # For BIND 9.9.x >> database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; >> >> # For BIND 9.10.x >> # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; >> }; >> >> And my bind is 9.9.4...

...=========================== dnssec-validation auto; tkey-gssapi-keytab "/var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab"; auth-nxdomain no; # conform to RFC1035 listen-on-v6 { any; }; }; /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38904 Apr 4 18:05 dlz_bind9.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38904 Apr 4 18:05 dlz_bind9_10.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38904 Apr 4 18:05 dlz_bind9_11.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38904 Apr 4 18:05 dlz_bind9_9.so /etc/hosts 192.168.117.10 server5 192.168.117.10 server5.intdom.group /etc/hostname server5 On...

...it will act as fileserver too. > Is it true that Samba's internal dns server won't good for that, and > I > need Bind, because of Bind's zone transfer feature? I don't see the connection with zone transfers. At the small scale either will work fine. At larger scales, DLZ_BIND9 is slower (yes really) particularly if you ask it to be the default DNS server for the network, but the internal DNS server also can fall over faster under a high forwarding load. The reason for the performance problem in the DLZ_BIND9 case is a lock over access to Samba's DB, and the behaviou...

...ion from the apt-get didn't give me the correct version. I've included the /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf file in my /etc/bind/named.conf, but on starting the bind9 service I get the following message: dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 1 should be 2 in '/usr/local/samba/modules/bind9/dlz_bind9.so' Does anybody have any idea how to fix this problem. Thank you.

Samba 4.0.0, CentOS 6.4, bind 9.9 DLZ. I could use some help debugging a strange DNS issue. I have two Samba4 domain controllers, dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu and dc-2.europa.icse.cornell.edu. On either dc-1 or dc-2 or any client host: # host dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu dc-2 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.15.250 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.3.250

...ude "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; };

...I remove DLZ external DNS requests are a few ms.  If it is enabled then internal and external DNS requests are a 1-3 seconds or timeout.  Downgrading BIND had no effect. I reverted just the DLZ modules back to 4.7.0 and performance is back to normal: # cp /usr/src/samba-4.7.0/bin/modules/bind9/dlz_bind9* /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9 # echo 'export LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/src/samba-4.7.0/bin/modules/ldb' >> /etc/sysconfig/named # service named restart Thanks, Arthur This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, including PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. If you are n...

Hi, I set up Samba DCs for two sites. The first site is for example domain.ourdomain.com, the second is site2.ourdomain.com. On the first site, there will be 2 DCs, and one fileserver, on the second site there will be one DC, and it will act as fileserver too. Is it true that Samba's internal dns server won't good for that, and I need Bind, because of Bind's zone transfer feature?

...you can use the standard Bind9 package > on 14.04 with Samba. > > I will update the wiki page. > > Rowland On second read through.  I assume the only contents in named.conf is dlz "AD DNS Zone" {     # For BIND 9.8     # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9.so";     # For BIND 9.9      # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so";     # For BIND 9.10     # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so";     # For BIND 9.11     # database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_...

...ot;; > > # > # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema > # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version > # > dlz "AD DNS Zone" { > # For BIND 9.8.0 > database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; > > # For BIND 9.9.0 > # database "dlopen > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; > }; > > You will probably have to change the paths. > > Rowland > >> I notice I do not have 'named.conf'. I have 'named.co...

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Rowland, Thanks for the reply. I believe you're right. It appears the zone information is retrieved from '/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf'? Correct? I notice I do not have 'named.conf'. I have 'named.conf.update'. On 12/16/2014 9:21 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/12/14 13:54, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Looking to switch to Bind.

Hi, I'm new to this list and Samba4, so may be this is a stupid question. I've installed samba4 (4.0.0alpha18-GIT-7b42ceb) on a server in my home LAN and have a problem with samba_dlz and bind (9.8.1-P1). In the zone definition file for my LAN domain, I had configured the IP addresses for several host names (e.g. printer, ...) with "A" records. This worked perfectly fine in

On Wed, July 22, 2020 21:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Are you using DLZ_BIND9? There is a bug where it doesn't know the locking rules for those files. No. I am using the internal dns service. > Otherwise, work out which commend it is waiting on (the child) and > what lock that is waiting on (lslocks on linux is what I used to > debug this stuff). There doe...