search for: dlmlock

...source *res" is added to dlm_new_lock() so that we can know if we need to allocate lvb for the dlm_lock. And we have to make the lockres availale for calling dlm_new_lock(). Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 3 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h index 49e6492..4e10aa6 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcom...

...cluster is NOT balanced. When the load on both systems is even the problem occurs. Looking into the logs revealed strange lock problems from the DLM. See lines below: Feb 19 10:31:52 web1 kernel: (31564,0):dlm_send_remote_lock_request:315 ERROR: status = -40 Feb 19 10:31:52 web1 kernel: (31564,0):dlmlock_remote:251 ERROR: dlm status = DLM_BADARGS Feb 19 10:31:52 web1 kernel: (31564,0):dlmlock:729 ERROR: dlm status = DLM_BADARGS Feb 19 10:31:52 web1 kernel: (31564,0):ocfs2_lock_create:901 ERROR: Dlm error "DLM_BADARGS" while calling dlmlock on resource F000000000000000155f89eb780960c: bad...

Hi, Everything compiled correctly for the ocfs2 package, but so far the modules will not load with the "well known" module symbol error. FATAL: Error inserting ocfs2 (/lib/modules/2.6.16.27-0.6-smp/kernel/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) Okay not sure what is up here, any suggestions? BTW, this is the correct module location and I

...error on Ubuntu Dapper 6.06 LTS amd64. It seems to happen from time to time. Does any one know what this is and if there is a way to fix it? Nov 29 01:19:14 <hostname> kernel: [221867.166529] (11588,0):ocfs2_lock_create:818 ERROR: Dlm error "DLM_IVLOCKID" while calling dlmlock on resource M000000000000000593c7cc33386710: bad lockid Nov 29 01:19:14 <hostname> kernel: [221867.181570] (11588,0):ocfs2_cluster_lock:966 ERROR: status = -22 Nov 29 01:19:14 <hostname> kernel: [221867.188321] (11588,0):ocfs2_meta_lock_full:1612 ERROR: status = -22...

...,5):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:393 ERROR: dlm status = DLM_IVLOCKID Dec 4 09:15:11 heraclito kernel: (snmpd,16452,5):dlmconvert_remote:327 ERROR: dlm status = DLM_IVLOCKID Dec 4 09:15:11 heraclito kernel: (snmpd,16452,5):ocfs2_cluster_lock:1258 ERROR: DLM error DLM_IVLOCKID while calling dlmlock on resource M00000000000 0000000000b6f931666: bad lockid Dec 4 09:15:11 heraclito kernel: (snmpd,16452,5):ocfs2_inode_lock_full:2121 ERROR: status = -22 Dec 4 09:15:11 heraclito kernel: (snmpd,16452,5):_ocfs2_statfs:1266 ERROR: status = -22 Dec 4 09:15:11 heraclito kernel: (vzlist,22622,9):dl...

Hi, i dont seem to be able to get ocfs running on RH3 U8 32Bit [root@libra-devb-db1 root]# uname -a Linux devb-db1.mydomain 2.4.21-47.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 5 20:38:41 EDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [root@devb-db1 root]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 8) [root@devb-db1 root]# rpm -ivh ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.14-1.i686.rpm Preparing...

Dear Sirs and Madams, I run a small visual effects production company, Hammerhead Productions. We'd like to have an easily extensible inexpensive relatively high-performance storage network using open-source components. I was hoping that OCFS2 would be that system. I have a half-dozen 2 TB fileservers I'd like the rest of the network to see as a single 12 TB disk, with the aggregate

Found 15 patches (out of 162) that appeared relevant to ocfs2 1.4. Please review. Sunil

...1 + fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c | 3 + fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 75 +-- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c | 8 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 4 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c | 4 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 28 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 6 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 30 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 27 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 16 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 3 +- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 215 +++++++-- fs/ocfs2/inode.c...

The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools have moved to 1.8.3. I suggest removing the versioning system in the kernel altogether and let the kernel version be the guide to debug issues. However, if you think versioning is still required, please state the reason and modify the version string in the ver.* files to reflect the uptodate

...luster/tcp_internal.h | 2 + fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 49 ++ fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c | 911 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.h | 86 +++ fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 70 ++- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 22 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 200 ++----- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 645 ++++++++++++-------- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h | 5 +- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 4 +- fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c...

This email is also sent to cluster-devel at redhat.com. Since this issue is about both dlm and ocfs2, I send the email here to look for help from upstream. This is an already known issue. on ocfs2 with user space cluster stack, run the test script from http://people.redhat.com/~teigland/make_panic on the mounted ocfs2 volume from 2 nodes simultaneously, the access to ocfs2 volume on both nodes

These patches convert the mle list to a hash. The same patches apply on ocfs2 1.4 too. Currently, we use the same number of hash pages for mles and lockres'. This will be addressed in a future patch that will make both of them configurable. Sunil

The changes from the last drop are: 1. Patch 11 removes struct dlm_lock_name. 2. Patch 12 is an unrelated bugfix. Actually is related to a bugfix that we are retracting in mainline currently. The patch may need more testing. While I did hit the condition in my testing, Marcos hasn't. I am sending it because it can be queued for 2.6.30. Give us more time to test. 3. Patch 13 will be useful

Please review the list of patches being applied to the ocfs2 1.4 tree. All patches list the mainline commit hash. Thanks Sunil

...00086 ffff881000000000 ffff88102013b040 > 0000000000012c40 ffff880471855fd8 0000000000012c40 ffff880471854010 > ffff880471855fd8 0000000000012c40 ffff881017ff8e40 0000000100000000 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8148d45d>] ? schedule_timeout+0x1ed/0x2d0 > [<ffffffffa0b7d1ea>] ? dlmlock+0x8a/0xda0 [ocfs2_dlm] > [<ffffffff8148ce5c>] ? wait_for_common+0x12c/0x1a0 > [<ffffffff81052230>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x280/0x280 > [<ffffffffa0a3b9c0>] ? __ocfs2_cluster_lock+0x1f0/0x780 [ocfs2] > [<ffffffff8148ce80>] ? wait_for_common+0x150/0x1a0 > [<ffffff...

Hi, The following patches comprise the bulk of Ocfs2 updates for the 2.6.30 merge window. Aside from larger, more involved fixes, we're adding the following features, which I will describe in the order their patches are mailed. Sunil's exported some more state to our debugfs files, and consolidated some other aspects of our debugfs infrastructure. This will further aid us in debugging