search for: dllvm_enable_cxx1i

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "dllvm_enable_cxx1i".

Did you mean: dllvm_enable_cxx1y
2018 May 05
4
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being rather slow. It's accounting for the vast majority of my full compilation time.  I'm trying to figure out why this is happening, since it's becoming an impediment.  (Note: by slow I mean about 3s of time for only about 2K of my front-end code, 65K lines of LLVM-IR) Using valgrind I see some functions which seem
2019 Jan 08
2
[LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
Are you using static linking, -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS, or -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB? On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:21 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > > > I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. > > > > David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? > > It's
2016 Mar 14
2
LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
Greetings! I have been building llvm-3.6.x, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 with (glibc-2.12.1, binutils-2.24, gcc-4.9.2) almost same set if CMake flags. However while building LLVM-3.8.0 using same CMake flags I am observing projects/libcxx/include/cmath errors... ...'::signbit' has not been declared ...'::fpclassify' has not been declared ...'::isfinite' has not been declared ...
2018 May 05
0
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
Hi, Could you share how you compile IR and which version of JIT you use (Orc, MCJIT)? Could it be that you are using interpreter instead of actual JIT? Cheers, Alex. > On 5. May 2018, at 08:04, edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being > rather slow. It's accounting for
2016 Mar 14
2
LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
cmake -E cmake_progress_report llvm-3.8.0.src_bld_x86_64-rhel6.4-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles In file included from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/__hash_table:19:0, from llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/src/hash.cpp:10: llvm-3.8.0.src/projects/libcxx/include/cmath:310:9: error: '::signbit' has not been declared using ::signbit; ^
2018 May 05
0
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
Hi, On 2018-05-05 08:04:54 +0200, edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev wrote: > I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being > rather slow. It's accounting for the vast majority of my full > compilation time.  I'm trying to figure out why this is happening, since > it's becoming an impediment.  (Note: by slow I mean about 3s of time for > only
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Building clang + libc++ + libc++abi
[Sorry about the crosspost. Since this is a clang build question but the build is invoked from the top-level LLVM directory I'm not sure where the question should go.] I've got a clang build against libstdc++ on Linux but I would really like one built against libc++/libc++abi. In other words I'd like to rebuild clang/llvm with clang using libc++ and libc++abi on Linux. I looked at
2018 May 31
1
Hang generating sanitizer tests
Just to follow-up, I'm now encountering this as well. I'm doing this on Linux. It seems that when linking with the most-recently built clang, the unit tests are taking a while to complete. It's notably not using more than 1 thread, and if using `lld` I would have expected the linker to still be running in parallel. I'm doing this on a debug build, so that might help narrow it
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Building clang + libc++ + libc++abi
If your cut-n-paste is accurate, you seem to be missing a closing quote for CMAKE_CXX_LINK_FLAGS. hth... don On Jul 8, 2015 2:22 AM, "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > > > I looked at the instructions on the libc++ page and for Linux it > > recommends building with -stdlib=libc++ -lc++abi.
2019 Apr 03
2
LLVM 8 + Mavericks?
Does LLVM 8 work in macOS 10.9.5? -- Mark
2019 Apr 08
2
LLVM 8 + Mavericks?
W dniu 2019-04-04 o 09:18, Tim Northover pisze: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:05, Audiovisart via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Does LLVM 8 work in macOS 10.9.5? > It should do. The released binaries appear to have been compiled so > they can run on that version, and Apple Clang 6.0 (from the newest > Xcode that runs on 10.9) meets the build