Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dllexportedfn".
Did you mean:
dllexportedfns
2013 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: auto-linking IR proposal
...; ++I) {
+ name = " /DEFAULTLIB:\"";
+ name += *I;
+ name += "\"";
+ OutStreamer.EmitBytes(name, 0);
+ }
+ }
+
for (Module::const_iterator I = M.begin(), E = M.end(); I != E; ++I)
if (I->hasDLLExportLinkage())
DLLExportedFns.push_back(Mang->getSymbol(I));
/* end of patch */
I am currently looking for advice on what is the correct approach to
re-implement #pragma comment(lib, ...) with Clang/LLVM.
A mingw linker (at least the one that I played with) just ignores this directive
with no warnings or errors.
One can...
2013 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: auto-linking IR proposal
..."";
> + name += *I;
> + name += "\"";
> + OutStreamer.EmitBytes(name, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> for (Module::const_iterator I = M.begin(), E = M.end(); I != E; ++I)
> if (I->hasDLLExportLinkage())
> DLLExportedFns.push_back(Mang->getSymbol(I));
>
> /* end of patch */
>
> I am currently looking for advice on what is the correct approach to
> re-implement #pragma comment(lib, ...) with Clang/LLVM.
>
> A mingw linker (at least the one that I played with) just ignores this
> directive...
2013 Jan 15
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: auto-linking IR proposal
Hi all,
We plan to add some auto-linking support for Mach-O, and need a scheme for
encoding this information in the LLVM IR. We would like the same scheme to
be able to support Microsoft's #pragma comment(lib,...) and #pragma
comment(library, ...) features eventually.
The current proposal is as follows:
--
#1. Extend module-level metadata flags (llvm.module.flags) to support two
new