search for: dlete

...ong I am (who are actually whitelisted would be > really good to know). > > I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts. The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site). In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in the visible whitelist, and would visit new websites. It would list some n javascripts blocked out of m scripts. Clicking on 'options' tab on bottom, I would not see the 'allowed' scripts listed.

Hi I'm experiencing a strange problem on my dovecot 2.0.21 setup. When i delete a folder "foo" it was correctly moved in the trash folder. If i try to delete from it the folder "foo" from the trash it gets renamed "foo1". If I try to dlete "foo1" it gets renamed foo11, and the operation could be continued figured out in an endless loop. This happens both from thunderbird and sogo (a webmail). Is it a known bug or a misconfiguration ? Thx in advance

...Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts. >> The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of >> javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site). >> In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in the visible >> whitelist, and would visit new websites. It would list some >> n javascripts blocked out of m scripts. >> Clicking on 'options' tab on bottom, I would not see the >> 'allowed' scripts listed. > > So, you're scaring peop...

...d',averages) , is it okay that it's been running for 4 hours or does this mean that something went wrong. I am on windows XP and i did ctrl alt delete and it seems like the process is running as far as i can tell. I have 4 cpus and the one is getting used at its max and when i do ctrl alt dlete task manager and click on processes it says 699,412K under the mem usage column but that number hasn't changed in a looong time. when i click on performance, cpu usage says 25 % which make sense. and pf usage sys 970 MB. physical memory total is 8387312, available 6868916 and system cache is 3...

...ord you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been denied. at first i was thinking that it was the win98 machine, only one of them was having a problem, but they all now have the problem.? this problem first started on monday.? i finally got the machine to logon on after i dleted all of the network info and reinstalled.? but the next day the same problem, and the reinstall didnt work.? does any one have any ideas smb.conf [global] ?workgroup = COZY ?netbios name = COZY_SRV? ?server string = Cozy Samba Server ?passdb backend = tdbsam ?security = user? ?client ntl...

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts. > The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of > javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site). > In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in the visible > whitelist, and would visit new websites. It would list some > n javascripts blocked out of m scripts. > Clicking on 'options' tab on bottom, I would not see the > 'allowed' scripts listed. So, you're scaring people away from a privacy-en...

...homes mapped with read and write permission on the home ( this troubled too ) now i tested funktions from usrmgr ( old nt prog for create user and groups ) i can create user on the fly, i can create groups on the fly i can delete groups on the fly add and delete users to groups but if i want to dlete users with delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u log shows me [2003/06/23 20:48:10, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_unknown_2d(4251) _samr_unknown_2d: Not yet implemented. what does this mean i am not a programmer at all, but this line works from command line very good, and additional...

On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >> that is not viewable by the user. >> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed >> entries. > You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on > my computer and