search for: dkeppler

>I have written a wrapper which includes gcc/g++,ld and llvm counterparts, >it invokes native or llvm compiler and linker according to the options it >receives,after I replace the native tools with my wrapper in libtool >script, I just typed like this > >make CC=wrapper AC_CFLAGS=-emit-llvm > >then I got a bc file of slapd and other tools in clients directory > >The

...9;t test it completely for Apache , when I finish that I will post it ASAP. BTW, Have you archieved the same goal with gold-plugin???I once tried it but just got a failure for llvm tools is not completely compatible with GNU ones. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keppler, Dave" <dkeppler at mitre.org> To: "Nan Zhu" <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>; <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:10 AM Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] I have built a whole-program bitcode file foropenldap-2.19 >I have written a wrapper which includes gcc/g++,ld and llvm coun...

Hi,all I have written a wrapper which includes gcc/g++,ld and llvm counterparts, it invokes native or llvm compiler and linker according to the options it receives,after I replace the native tools with my wrapper in libtool script, I just typed like this make CC=wrapper AC_CFLAGS=-emit-llvm then I got a bc file of slapd and other tools in clients directory The accessory is the whole-program

>> I'm compiling it as follows, which completes with no errors on either >LLVM version. >> >> LLVM_CONFIG=<the llvm-config from the version I want to use> >> gcc `$LLVM_CONFIG --cflags` -o main.o -c main.c >> g++ `$LLVM_CONFIG --cflags` \ >> `$LLVM_CONFIG --ldflags` \ >> main.o `$(LLVM_CONFIG) --libfiles engine BitReader` >>

Hi all, I have some code that uses the x86 JIT via the C bindings that I'm trying to migrate from targeting LLVM 2.5 to the top of tree, but I'm running into a linking problem I can't figure out. Here's how I'm invoking the JIT in 2.5. LLVMInitializeNativeTarget(); <-- for the updated version LLVMCreateMemoryBufferWithContentsOfFile("code.bc", &buffer,

>>> someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I >will >>> have a try later. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? >> >> Afaik gold does not help here. I tried it and managed to only generate >> native code. > >"Just" gold isn't quite good enough, because at the last final link >steps gold will