search for: djk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 31 matches for "djk".

Did you mean: djb
2017 Jul 01
0
fsck looping duplicate mdbox GUIDs
...ntu package on 16.04. It appears that I have a couple of duplicate GUIDs which fsck can't clear so the machine is looping through doing continuous fsck runs. Any way to determine what the offending messages are and how to delete or otherwise stop this? Jul 1 17:09:24 post dovecot: doveadm(djk at tobit.co.uk): Warning: fscking index file /home/imap/djk/storage/dovecot.map.index Jul 1 17:09:24 post dovecot: doveadm(djk at tobit.co.uk): Error: Fixed index file /home/imap/djk/storage/dovecot.map.index: log_file_tail_offset 0 -> 24 Jul 1 17:09:24 post dovecot: dsync-local(djk): Warni...
2015 Nov 05
0
replication delays
...with mdbox and a simple all vmail based system with not many users. I am not seeing any error messages in my mail logs that suggest there any delays happening. Although I have seen a few things like this happening from time to time a busier account: Nov 5 12:12:07 france dovecot: dsync-server(djk): Error: Couldn't lock /home/imap/djk/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out after 30 seconds Nov 5 12:12:13 france dovecot: dsync-server(djk at tobit.co.uk): Error: Couldn't lock /home/imap/djk/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out after 30 seconds Nov 5 12:16:49 france dovecot: dsync-server(djk): Erro...
2014 Jan 07
1
samba_dnsupdate: could not talk to any default name server
...IP address must have come from /etc/hosts :- $ hostname gumbo.$domain $ grep gumbo /etc/hosts 127.0.1.1 gumbo.$domain $ I don't have 127.0.1.1 in /etc/resolv.conf or /etc/samba/smb.conf. -- ___________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk-samba at cyber.com.au> Cyber IT Solutions Pty. Ltd. http://www.cyber.com.au/~djk/ Linux & Unix Systems Administration
2005 Jan 10
5
Traceroute unblocking, single interface, policy drop
I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all
2004 May 26
1
dovecot immediately exits on Fedora 2
I "upgraded" my server running UW-IMAP on Fedora 1, to Fedora 2, which defaults to Dovecot. Unfortunately, the server refuses connecions from my client (Mozilla). It seems that Dovecot immediately exits: ps aux|grep dovecot shows nothing. Also, if I manually start up dovecot, it immediately exits, with no messages. (It does at least parse the config file, since tweaking that gives me
2004 Jun 14
1
Default domain ?
Hello, I'm in the process of migrating from qpopper to dovecot and I've stumbled upon the least expected thing: In qpopper I can specify a 'default domain', which will be used if an user will only issue his username (not the whole email address) when logging in. Because of this, the users in my main domain don't use the whole email address when getting their mail. I'd
2004 Jun 26
1
invalid mask
Hi ! I still get the message: "The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: invalid mask" I am using the Netscapes mail client. Adrian
2004 Jul 15
1
can't see IMAP folders - Fedora Core 2
Recently, I upgraded (switched) to Fedora Core 2. Previously, I was running Fedora Core 1, with Cyrus-IMAP, and life was good. Now, I can not see any of my folders. I suspect it is a simple dovecot.conf configuration edit, but i'm not experienced enough with it to make the correct edits. I am using Postfix with Dovecot. My mail directory is; /home/(user)/mail snip from the conf file;
2013 Nov 21
1
CONNECTION_REFUSED
Hello, I am using Samba 4.0.5 and got this kind of error messages in samba.log (loglevel 2). While this happens getent passwd shows no domain users, but everyone could reach all of the shares. Any idea what could cause this kind of error messages? [2013/11/21 15:53:15.736390, 1] ../source3/smbd/sesssetup.c:276(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego) Failed to generate session_info (user and group
2013 Nov 25
1
Fwd: Samba Error
Hi, Having a error on samba 3.5 " *get_peer_name: getnameinfo failed for ::ffff:192.168.1.12 with error Temporary failure in name resolution*" & samba not accessible from windows client. Please help me Regards, Dinesh 9870601660
2013 Nov 26
0
VFS shadow_copy2 with samba 4.0.9
...s to better doc on shadow copy for samba 4.0 or ideas I can try? Or even questions. I have also tried log level=1 vfs:10 but I didn't see clues about where it was looking for shadow copy dirs. -- ___________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk at cyber.com.au> Cyber IT Solutions Pty. Ltd. http://www.cyber.com.au/~djk/ Linux & Unix Systems Administration
2004 Jun 09
2
Corrupted index file
Hi, I've been wondering for a while if reiserfs is dovecot+maildir safe or not. I get this too often (and my imap session gets disconnected): Jun 9 08:42:32 sun imap(nk): Corrupted index file /home/nk/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap .index: UIDVALIDITY changed in uidlist This happens always when a new mail arrives in maildir. It's a Fedora Core 2 box running dovecot-0.99.10.4-4 (redhat) package.
2013 Nov 26
1
vestigial DNS entries
I am running samba 4.2.0 as an AD with internal DNS. I had an earlier version of Samba4 that was running old code and the system had gotten cluttered up from my learning process. I chose to replace it by bringing up a new Samba4 DC, letting them sync, then promote the new, and demote the old. That all worked flawlessly. Eventually I destroyed the old Samba4 system. Today I tried to play
2016 Mar 09
2
Client-initiated secure renegotiation
On 09/03/16 10:44, Florent B wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see any SSL configuration option in Dovecot to disable > "Client-initiated secure renegotiation". > > It is advised to disable it as it can cause DDoS (CVE-2011-1473). > > Is it possible to have this possibility through an SSL option or other ? > > Thank you. > > Florent ssl_protocols = !SSLv3
2004 Jun 08
5
folders via softlink
I have recently switched from the UW imap server to dovecot and things seem to be working nicely. One thing that I can't seem to figure out however, is how to get dovecot to show folders that are a softlink. We run SpamAssassin. Users can use both their own personal spam folder as well as a shared spam folder. For messages that everyone would consider spam, the user can simply drag the
2016 Mar 10
2
Client-initiated secure renegotiation
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Osiris <dovecot at flut.demon.nl> wrote: > On 09-03-16 13:14, djk wrote: >> On 09/03/16 10:44, Florent B wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see any SSL configuration option in Dovecot to disable >>> "Client-initiated secure renegotiation". >>> >>> It is advised to disable it as it can cause DDo...
2004 May 24
3
Dovecot + SSL + Fedora
...ource, patching it, re-compiling and re-installing. We are using Fedora Core 1 (fedora-release-1-3 i386 rpm) Dovecot 0.99.10 (dovecot-0.99.10-4 i386 rpm) OpenSSL 0.9.7a (openssl-0.9.7a-33.10 i386 rpm) ___________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk at cybersource.com.au> http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/ Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting
2003 Jan 06
3
ADSL PCI cards
Does anyone have any information or recommendations for ADSL PCI Cards for Linux boxes? E.g. which ones are supported? How much are they? etc. Dirk -- Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Product, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State.
2015 Sep 02
1
more than two way replication
Is there anyway of replicating between more than one other instance of Dovecot. I have bidirectional replication working successfully and it seems to be reliable. I would like to replicate from one or more of these instances to one other. Is this possible? Dirk
2005 Dec 10
2
known_hosts and multiple hosts through a NAT router
The .ssh/known_hosts table cannot handle reaching different sshd servers behind a NAT router. The machines are selected by having the SSHDs respond to differnt ports. A second request would be to allow known_hosts checking solely on the dns name, wildcarding the IP address. This would be useful to avoid continuously warning the user every time you connect to a machine with a changing IP address