search for: dixons

I am using R dixon.test in order to perform Q test for detection of outliers. The p-values for high Q values are consistent with the table in Rorabacher, D.B. (1991) http://www.flworkshop.com/sscs/dixon_test.pdf, but it seems that small Q-values get problematic p-values. For example: dixon.test(c(0.324,0.5,1,1.324),two.sided=T) Q = 0.324, p-value = 1

I would like to extend Dixon's values beyond 30. I've read over Rorabacher article but didn't understand the equations well enough to convert them to Excel and then "drag" the cells out extending the n. Rorabacher,_1991.pdf <http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4649819/Rorabacher%2C_1991.pdf> Dean_&_Dixon,_1951.pdf

Hi, I need some help using the R outliers package. I would like to perform a Q-test (Dixon test) on my data set. I used the dixon.test function, but I cannot understand what is the confidence level used to perform the test. I have n=101 (n= number of data). So, can I use directly dixon.test ? What about qdixon and qtable functions? thank you so much! -- View this message in context:

Dear R-users, Has anyone written a function for multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis? The "fractal" package does mono-fractal DFA, but not multifractal as far as I can tell. The MF-DFA approach is presented in: J. W. Kantelhardt, S. Zschiegner, E. Koscielny-Bunde, S. Havlin, A. Bunde, and H. E. Stanley, "Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of

I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as

I have a SGI Altix 350 (ia64) that came with RHAS 4, but without any paid support. I would like to migrate the server over to CentOS. Here is what I've pieced together from some older posts by Johnny, can someone confirm this should work? I know this is somewhat covered in the FAQ, although both entries refer to FC or WBEL, which already have built-in yum support. Install the

I have been learning about some outlier tests -- Dixon and Grubb, specifically -- for small data sets. When I try help.start() and search for outlier tests, the only response I manage to find is the Bonferroni test avaiable from the CAR package... are there any other packages the offer outlier tests? Are the Dixon and Grubb tests "good" for small samples or are others more

I'm trying to get dovecot working with various clients on my new mailserver. I installed the base rc2 that comes with OpenBSD 4.0, then upgraded to rc14 when I ran into problems with TLS and Thunderbird. The server has no problems with Mail.app on my laptop, but any connection attempts from Thunderbird timeout after the TCP handshake. 13:53:41.074438 66.x.x.2.50483 >

Hi folks: I've recently migrated one of my production servers (bad Jason!) from WBEL to CentOS 3.3 using Donavan's instructions in the FAQ (http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=19). While it was as painless as the document suggests, I've run into problems with postgrey (a postfix greylisting daemon) on my server. Whenever I try to start postgrey, I get the

First off I am totally annoyed and let down by PC World Business (PCWB part of the Dixons Group). I ordered one of these babies from them over a month ago. After constantly chasing them up they finally told me they couldn't deliver, and have now only just returned the money they "stole" from me. I only bought from them because they showed a 4-day availability stock level!...

Hi I have a file system that contains millions of small files. Since I backup it everyday with rsync using slow WAN link, I think it will be nice that if rsync can do this: An option that let rsync only check with remote rsync daemon about local files that has last modification time newer than one day ago (so is modified since yesterday backup). This can greatly reduce the WAN traffic. Is this

I'm attempting to upgrade to kernel-smp-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL (x86_64) on a Dell 1850. The new kernel is panicing on reboot. When comparing against the current working kernel, I just noticed that we're currently running the "UP" kernel: [root at polaris root]# uname -srvp Linux 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL #1 SMP Wed Jan 19 11:49:43 CST 2005 x86_64 First question... why is the kernel

> > I am not sure how to use Microsoft AD tools to create shares and then > set > those shares permissable to certain AD groups. For example, I need to > create > a share called "Finance" and only the people in Finance can read/write > to > it. I was hoping to use SWAT to help in creation and management of > those > shares. vi smb.conf (or your favorite

? Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:47:52 -0600 Dave Dixon <ddixon at swcp.com> ?????: > > second_records <- read.csv(file_name, skip = 2459465, nrows = 5) It may or may not be important that read.csv defaults to header = TRUE. Having skipped 2459465 lines, it may attempt to parse the next one as a header, so the second call read.csv() should probably include header = FALSE. Bert's advice

Hi all- I have a Centos 3.6 server in production that hadn't been rebooted in quite some time. I was finally onsite today and took the chance to reboot into the most current kernel, but the box hung while "stopping iptables". Some Googling led me to one or two reports of systems hanging while the iptables initscript unloaded the modules. Has anyone else encountered this?

The http://www.xapian.org/debian/archive_key.asc key file referenced on http://xapian.org/download.php is missing. Any chance it could be restored? Paul Dixon

Hi All, I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to preserve permissions? It seems to me that the current behaviour runs against the grain of more than a quarter century of unix tradition, and certainly caught me by surprise the first time I encountered it.

I'm running Slackware 9.0 with a vanilla Linux kernel 2.4.25. Due to the announced EOL for 2.2.x, I'm trying to migrate our Samba hosts to version 3.0.5. These Samba hosts serve shares mounted off a seperate NFS fileserver. All is going well, except I've started getting the following messages in the smbd logs: ---- Start of snippet ---- [2004/08/11 09:59:30, 0]

Hi All, I'm really new to wine and I was interested in using it so that I can write my documentation in Word 2000 and kill the evil half of my hard drive. I've been running into some problems getting it to work though and I was wondering if anyone had any advice on the best way to set this up. I've tried to install wine and run the Word executable that lives on the Windows

Running CentOS 3.4, I enabled the ntpd service and noticed that it opens up a hole in the firewall for ntp from 127.127.1.0. I look in the ntpd initscript and see that it's reading in servers from /etc/ntp/step-tickers. However, that file is empty... /etc/ntp/ntpservers contains clock.redhat.com and clock2.redhat.com, but ntpservers isn't used *anywhere*. This looks like a bug, but