search for: divtest

The above-mentioned test contains this: long B53 = - (1LL << 53); strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or greater than ... the width of the promoted left operand, the behaviour is underfined". Thouhts? - Volodya

Vladimir Prus wrote: > The above-mentioned test contains this: > > long B53 = - (1LL << 53); > > strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about > shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or greater than ... the > width of the promoted left operand, the behaviour is underfined". Forget this, I've missed the 'LL'

...test still has a problem ;-) printf("%ld\n", Arg / (1LL << 4)); Again, the passed value is long long, and format specifier is '%ld'. What about the attached patch? - Volodya -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2002-05-19-DivTest.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 614 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040708/e12da2e8/attachment.diff>

On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:07, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > The above-mentioned test contains this: > > > > > > long B53 = - (1LL << 53); > > > > > > strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about > > > shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > > But the test still has a problem ;-) > > > > printf("%ld\n", Arg / (1LL << 4)); > > > > Again, the passed value is long long, and format specifier is '%ld'. What > > about the attached patch? > > I think testL has another problem. It takes a long argument which in C I > think is a 4-byte int,

...SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-09-ArrayResolution SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-12-StructureArgs SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-12-StructureArgsSimple SingleSource/Un...

...ce/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-06-IntOverflow | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-29-SimpleIndirectCall | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2008-04-18-LoopBug | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-13-BadLoad...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest | 0.0039 624 0.0023 * 0.0023 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest | 0.0038 720 0.0043 * 0.0041 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest | 0.0029 532 0.0020 * 0.0019...

...* 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest | 0.0040 620 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest | 0.0000 700 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest | 0.0000 532 0.0040 * 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest | 0.0067 616 0.0019 * 0.0018 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest | 0.0063 712 0.0032 * 0.0032 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest | 0.0016 524 0.0015 * 0.0014...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest | 0.0020 648 0.0014 * 0.0014 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest | 0.0015 756 0.0026 * 0.0026 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest | 0.0012 556 0.0010 * 0.0009...

...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest                                | > 0.0000 664      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest                                | > 0.0100 688      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest                               | > 0.0000 584      0.0000      *        ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03- > NotTest | 0.0000 664 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19- > DivTest | 0.0100 688 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02- > CastTest | 0.0000 584 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...0.01 2112 2002-05-02-CastTest2.ll 2 3803 0 0.01 3794 0 0.01 3794 2002-05-02-CastTest3.ll 1 2938 0 0.01 2929 0 0.01 2929 2002-05-02-CastTest.ll 2 11291 0 0.01 11282 0 0.01 11282 2002-05-02-ManyArguments.ll 2 4222 0 0.01 4213 0 0.01 4213 2002-05-03-NotTest.ll 3 6111 0 0.01 6102 0 0.01 6102 2002-05-19-DivTest.ll 3 3553 0 0.01 3544 0 0.01 3544 2002-08-02-CastTest2.ll 2 2144 0 0.01 2135 0 0.01 2135 2002-08-02-CastTest.ll 2 1777 0 0.01 1768 0 0.01 1768 2002-08-19-CodegenBug.ll 1 2750 0 0.01 2741 0 0.01 2741 2002-10-09-ArrayResolution.ll 1 2442 0 0.01 2433 0 0.01 2433 2002-10-12-StructureArgs.ll 2 3914 0 0....