search for: divisors

PATCH 1 ======= On my machine tc does not parse filter "sample" for the u32 filter. Eg: tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 ht 801: \ classid 1:3 \ sample ip protocol 1 0xff match ip protocol 1 0xff Illegal "sample" The reason is a missing memset. This patch fixes it. diff -Nur iproute-20051007.keep/tc/f_u32.c iproute-20051007/tc/f_u32.c

What is the difference between lines below? $TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 1 $TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 What divisor is doing? And the last problem... $TC filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: match ip src 10.0.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2: Why after ht

Hello, I have a vector of 1,000,000 numbers and another vector of 1,000 divisors. What I'd like to do is to divide the first 1,000 numbers of the first vector by the first divisor, then the next 1,000 by the second divisor and so on. I came up with this, but I was wondering if there is a more idiomatic, R-like way to write it: x <- ... divs <- ... for (i in seq(from...

Hello, Is there a function in R with which we could find the greatest common divisor directly? Or is there a funciton, which could help us to find the remainder of a division directly? Best wishes! Thank you! Your truly, Qing -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/greatest-common-divisor-tp2326262p2326262.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at

On 6 March 2015 at 03:47, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley at hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > From: James Bottomley <JBottomley at Parallels.com> > > The current string_get_size() overflows when the device size goes over > 2^64 bytes because the string helper routine computes the suffix from > the size in bytes. However, the entirety of Linux thinks in terms of >

On 6 March 2015 at 03:47, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley at hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > From: James Bottomley <JBottomley at Parallels.com> > > The current string_get_size() overflows when the device size goes over > 2^64 bytes because the string helper routine computes the suffix from > the size in bytes. However, the entirety of Linux thinks in terms of >

On 01/28/18 20:15, Fred Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:10:29PM -0500, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >> I'm upgrading from CentOS6 to CentOS 7. >> >> I run 2 weather stations on C6 and have one of them attached to >> ttyS0 which is on the motherboard, and the other to ttyS2 which in >> on an add-on PCI serial card. >> >> I'm migrating the

Hi all! :) I see that this is partially covered in the mailing list archive but at the moment I can''t find a straight & working answer. I have an imq device with dynamically attacched classes/qdiscs/filters. There is a hashing filter that maps the last octet of an user''s IP address to a class (and associated qdisc). The "empty" filter looks like this: filter

The interface is setup like this: # tc qdisc del dev eth0 root # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 2 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 20mbit ceil 20mbit If I add a second class and a filter to send traffic to it like this: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:130 htb rate 1Mbit ceil 1Mbit # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 130 u32

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be:

Hello, I wonder if there is a way to have a divisor bigger than 256 when creating hash tables with u32. It would really be great. Thanks

Objects compiled for the MS-ABI don't conform to it! Data types beyond 64 bit MUST BE returned by the callee via the hidden first argument allocated by the caller, NOT in XMM0! Demo/proof: from this source --- llvm-bug.c --- #ifndef __clang__ typedef struct { unsigned __int64 low; unsigned __int64 high; } __uint128_t; #else __attribute__((ms_abi)) #endif __uint128_t

Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches. Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10? Thanks, -justin _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Sorry for all the questions I''m just trying to understand how it all works. Thank you for your time. Is the following configuration possible? where ht 800 links to 3: for the 3rd Octet in the IP and then 3: links to 4: for the fourth Octet? tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 10 handle 3: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 ht 800::

Hi, please could you recommend a R package that computes a 2 sample z-test ? thanks, Bogdan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...icts whether x%%0.1 will give an answer of 0 or 0.1. I could find no explanation of the way that %% works in the R manuals. So, I have 3 questions:- 1) Why is the modulus of 0.3%%0.1 (and 0.5%%0.1 and 0.6%%0.1...) not zero? 2) Are there any algorithms in R that use the %% operator with fractional divisors in this way, and do they know about its apparently inconsistent behaviour? 3) If %% is not intended for use with fractional divisors, then would it be a good idea to trap attempts to use them? Thanks, in advance, for your help Jonathan Williams

Hi, I am trying to put together a hashing filter based on example provided in LARTC how-to document. I want to link two hashing filters together where first one will use 3rd octet of an IP address as hashkey and second one will use 4th octet as hash key. How do I tell mask the address so that u32 filter uses 3rd octet as hashkey? Venkatesh K _______________________________________________

Hi How can I control which filter a packet will meet first? I have tried changing the order of applying the tc filter scripts and switching flowid number, but ''protocol ip u32 match ip src <ip net> match ip src 0.0.0.0/0'' always kicks in first? >From my script -------------------- # All traffic - Priority: Low tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32

Hi, I am currently working on the TC. I have seen some behaviour which seems to be odd. I know someone in the mailing list would have seen this problem or may have some fix for this problem. When I try to include u32 filters with different priority or pref, I could see the filters being set on all the priority''s irrespective of the priority number. See my sample script below and the

I am trying to build a trafic control rule set for a huge NATed network, and I have it working for single known addresses but I need to scale it to 16M potential client addresses. I''m using iptables for NAT. Incoming traffic is simple because I can match destination address, outgoing traffic I use iptables IPMARK then tc match mark and it works perfectly if I build rules for each client