search for: divisibility

Introduction: We would like to add new keyword to 'sdiv'\'udiv' instructions i.e. 'no-overflow'. This is the updated solution devised in the discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118257.html The proposed keywords: "nof" stands for 'no-overflow' Syntax: <result> = sdiv nof <ty> <op1>,

Introduction ========== We would like to add support for masked vector signed/unsigned integer division and remainder in the LLVM IR by introducing new target-independent intrinsics. This follows similar work which was done already for masked vector loads and stores - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/078059.html. Another relevant reference is the masked scatter/gather

I have a nice hierarchical table structure like this: divisions has_many groups groups belongs_to division has_many subgroups subgroups belongs_to group has_many units units belongs_to subgroup I have a report which is based on units, but i want to be able to filter the units by which subgroup, or which group, or which division. I also want to sort them by division.name,then group.name,

[+current llvm-dev address] On 03/15/2017 09:23 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > What are you taking about? ;) > > The only way to get a SIGFPE from a floating-point division by zero is > to modify the floating-point environment to enable those exceptions. > We don't support that (*). In the default (supported) environment, > floating point division is well

It seems division with numbers bigger than 10 000 000 doesn't work 20000000/21 [1] 952381 > 55555555/23 [1] 2415459 Thank you

lets say i have the following SQL in my database editor : When i paste it into rad rails i have to add quotes and the ''+'' symbol to the end of each line. It is very tedious. What is the best method? select timesheets.employee, sum(items.hours) as hours, sum(items.hours*timesheets.cost) as cost, sum(items.hours*timesheets.charge*decode(activities.chargetype,0,1,0)) as charge,

On 04/29/2014 12:39 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote: > On April 29, 2014 at 11:27:06 AM, Philip Reames > (listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>) wrote: >> On 04/29/2014 10:44 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: >>> LD;DR: Your desire to use trapping on x86 only further convinces me >>> that Michael's proposed intrinsics are the best way to go.

On May 2, 2014 at 11:53:25 AM, Eric Christopher (echristo at gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Philip Reames  <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:  > Andy - If you're not already following this closely, please start. We've  > gotten into fairly fundamental questions of what a patchpoint does.  >  > Filip,  >  > I think you've hit the nail on

Andy - If you're not already following this closely, please start. We've gotten into fairly fundamental questions of what a patchpoint does. Filip, I think you've hit the nail on the head. What I'm thinking of as being patchpoints are not what you think they are. Part of that is that I've got a local change which adds a very similar construction (called

The file src/share/replaygain_synthesis/include/private/fast_float_math_hack.h redefines 'tanh' as 'tanhf'. This file is intended for Intel Compiler only, but it includes outdated mathf.h and doesn't work with current versions of ICC. The fixes are trivial though, and I compiled 2 versions of flac.exe: with this 'hack' turned off an on. The difference in decoding speed

Hello everyone, I am learning R since recently, and as a small exercise I wanted to write a recursive mergesort. I was extremely surprised to discover that my sorting, although operational, is deeply inefficient in time. Here is my code : > merge <- function(x,y){ > if (is.na(x[1])) return(y) > else if (is.na(y[1])) return(x) > else if (x[1]<y[1])

On 04/29/2014 10:44 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: > LD;DR: Your desire to use trapping on x86 only further convinces me > that Michael's proposed intrinsics are the best way to go. I'm still not convinced, but am not going to actively oppose it either. I'm leery of designing a solution with major assumptions we don't have data to backup. I worry your assumptions about

...560 bytes. Excuse my ignorance, but you say "largest possible cylinder size". We are not going to fill up to this theoretical maximum (our images are currently ~910 MiB for releases, and ~1.2 GiB for development builds) so I just want to double-check that what you propose also guarantees divisibility by 2048 for images that doesn't fill up to this maximum. Cheers!

Hi Team, I observer that division of __int128 bit is very heavy operation. It internally call a routine '__udivti3', which internally call ' __udivmodti4'. Due to it the overall performance is much much slower (almost 15 time slower than if I do it via a combination of 64-bit or microsoft '_udiv128'). Also what to know if I can directly call below routine directly from

Each Timesheet has an employee. An employee has a division and a location. I want to find all the timesheets with a status of 2. I then iterate over the timesheet collection and print the timesheet name, employee name, employee divison name, and employee location name. Like so: for t in Timesheet.find(:all,:conditions=>"status=2",:include=>:employee) puts timesheet.date

On 05/02/2014 11:57 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: > > On May 2, 2014 at 11:53:25 AM, Eric Christopher (echristo at gmail.com > <mailto:echristo at gmail.com>) wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Philip Reames >> <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> > Andy - If you're not already following this closely, please start. >> We've

Hi everybody, i've been using rsync for quite some time to sync files between my laptop and my desktop for example i use the following to backup the music library (from Mac to Linux) > rsync -rvzu --exclude=.DS_Store --delete --exclude 'Podcasts/*' > $LOCAL_MUSI $REMOTE_MUSIC >> $LOGFILE An odd thing i always noticed is that some files were always copied, even

Hey Jeffrey, Thanks for the suggestion. A few comments... On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at googlers.com>wrote: ... > > If you can find a way to implement -fsanitize=undefined to use the FP > trap instead of a branch when checking floating division by 0, I > suspect such a patch would stand a good chance of being accepted. > (Although I'm not

Dear R gurus. Is there an R function equivalent to octaves / (Right division) withouth forming the inverse of Y' using solve ? [snip - from octave docu] Right division. This is conceptually equivalent to the expression (inverse (y') * x')' but it is computed without forming the inverse of Y'. If the system is not square, or if the coefficient matrix

I was looking through the InstCombine pass, and I was wondering why signed division is not considered a valid operation to combine in the canEvaluateTruncated function. This means, given the following code: %conv = sext i16 %0 to i32 %conv1 = sext i16 %1 to i32 %div = sdiv i32 %conv, %conv1 %conv2 = trunc i32 %div to i16 * Assume %0 and %1 are registers created from simple 16-bit loads. We