search for: ditypearray

...assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> >> >> >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. >> >> >> If >> >> >> all >> >> >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray >> >> >> and >> >> >> use >> >> >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have >> >> >> unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. >> >> > >> >> > &...

...>> >> fire >> >> >> >> i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If >> >> all >> >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and >> >> use >> >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have >> >> unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. >> > >> > >> > I am going to work on a patch that adds DITypeArray (each e...

...t >> assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire >> >> i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If all >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and use >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have >> unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. > > > I am going to work on a patch that adds DITypeArray (each element will be > DITypeRef, SubroutineType's type array...

...to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If all elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and use that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. What are your thoughts? Suggestions are welcome. Is it a good idea to canonicalize file names (i.e dA/B.h should be equivalent to dA/../dA/B.h)? This wil...

Have I correctly inferred below, how I build IR and debug info for a function type and a function (value), in particular, how to supply the names of the formal parameters? To create a function in llvm IR and give names to its formal parameters, I must: 1. Build a LLVMTypeRef for the type of each formal and the function result. 2. Build a function type using LLVMFunctionType, from the results of