search for: disvantage

...cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people > to use a "git-only" solution. Amen. > >...

...ministrator user a uidNumber and it seem like a unix user. I can get the user info via "getent passwd administrator" It seems that everything works fine these years. but I saw some suggestions in the maillist said we "should not give Administrator a uidNumber". So Is there any disvantage if I give a uidNumber to Administrator? and How could I fix that if I already did that? I tries to set the uidNumber to none. but it didn;t make sense. I still got user info like getent passwd administrator administrator:*:10000:10001:.... Best, yours Adam

...May 31, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. Personally, I’m hugely in favor of moving llvm’s source hosting to github at some point, despite the fact that I continue to dislike git as a tool and co...

...;cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >>> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >>> that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but >>> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us >>> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. >> >> Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people >> to use a "git-only" solution....

...ing here: >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_File_Serving >> >> Should I use the "Setting up a share using Windows ACLs" tutorial? >> > You must use Windows ACLs on a DC, so yes, you will need to follow that > wikipage. Ok, just curious, are there any disvantages between using Windows ACLs instead of POSIX ACLs? Also, once I create a file server as Domain Member, how easy will be to migrate from DC? I am reading this https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs For the "Granting the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege Privilege&quo...

...at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people to use a "git-only" solution. > TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] co...

Folks, There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality we have currently with SVN. (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc). Here are some of the arguments...

...12:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality > we have currently with SVN. > > (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc)...

...ve Administrator a uidNumber, you turned it into a normal Unix user with the lack of authority this entails. > > It seems that everything works fine these years. but I saw some suggestions in the maillist said we "should not give Administrator a uidNumber". > So Is there any disvantage if I give a uidNumber to Administrator? and How could I fix that if I already did that? I tries to set the uidNumber to none. but it didn;t make sense. I still got user info like > getent passwd administrator > administrator:*:10000:10001:.... > If you had tried to do something as Administ...

On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:47:45 -0300 Flávio Silveira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok, just curious, are there any disvantages between using Windows > ACLs instead of POSIX ACLs? None that I am aware of, in fact there are several advantages. > > Also, once I create a file server as Domain Member, how easy will be > to migrate from DC? Not sure what you mean here, it sounds like you want to turn your Samba...

...6, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >> that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but >> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us >> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > Personally, I’m hugely in favor of moving llvm’s source hosting to github at some point, despite the fact that I continue to dislike gi...

...vm.org> wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >>>> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >>>> that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but >>>> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us >>>> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. >>> >>> Not everyone thinks git is a step forward. Please do not force people >>> to use a "git-o...

...6, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >> that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but >> many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us >> a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > Personally, I’m hugely in favor of moving llvm’s source hosting to github at some point, despite the fact that I continue to dislike gi...

On 14/09/2017 12:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >>> well possibly, but I will rephrase my question, are: >>> >>> libpam-winbind libpam-krb5 libnss-winbind >>> >>> installed ? >> Yes sir, all three are installed, should I proceed to editing >> nsswitch.conf as described on the tutorial? >> >>> Rowland >>>

...at 3:31 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us > a lot of headaches, admin costs and timed out connections. > > TL;DR: GitHub + git submodules [1] could replace all the functionality > we have currently with SVN. > > (also GitLab, BitBucketc, etc...

...e Administrator a uidNumber, you turned it into a normal Unix user with the lack of authority this entails. > > It seems that everything works fine these years. but I saw some suggestions in the maillist said we "should not give Administrator a uidNumber". > So Is there any disvantage if I give a uidNumber to Administrator? and How could I fix that if I already did that? I tries to set the uidNumber to none. but it didn;t make sense. I still got user info like > getent passwd administrator > administrator:*:10000:10001:.... > If you had tried to do something as Administ...

On 15/09/2017 09:29, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:47:45 -0300 > Flávio Silveira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Ok, just curious, are there any disvantages between using Windows >> ACLs instead of POSIX ACLs? > None that I am aware of, in fact there are several advantages. Great! >> Also, once I create a file server as Domain Member, how easy will be >> to migrate from DC? > Not sure what you mean here, it sounds like you wa...

Hi, I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I understand that for > 2 links it will become