search for: distrubing

Dear All Greetings. I have a question regarding ext3 file system. I have installed Red Hat linux 8 with ext2 file system and I have multiple partition. Now I want to convert them to ext3 file system without distrubing my data. If any one got the idea, please let me know. Thanks Muhammad Noman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20040415/824cdd9a/attachment.htm>

...ete)" in the 2.6.12 kernel. I can make SIP calls and outgoing phone calls as well, but gathered a few problems on my way: 1. Plain SIP calls using softphones on windows clients work fine not counting the delay I'm experimenting. We talk about 1-1.5 secs delay in the speech which is rather distrubing (no noise in the line though). 2. Outgoing calls eg. to my mobile phone has some more serious problems. Speech quality on my mobile phone is excellent. However, sound quality on the asterisk console machine where I dialled from is about unacceptable. It has about 90% static noise and about 10% spe...

Hello, Running 3.2.0, and in one of my share, a file named TABAFK~V appeared, but is not present on the underlying filesystem. The file can't be removed from a windows client (even a member of domain admins). Not that it is distrubing, but you know... Fran?ois

...aving an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:42 AM, imane hajar <imane.chafiki.fst at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Mr Gunter , > i am sorry for distrubing you again ,i think its just a miss understanding > of the problem, i said in the last lines of my msj that my main problem is > that i cant use " DVstats" , i installed it using install.packages("DVstat > s") and it seems ok , but when i use the following line : library...

...te stuff through the scop detection is probably not what we want. > Do you have any suggestion? I do. Your patch goes in the right direction and it helped to get a better idea of what should be done. I think the first point that we learned is that passing class pointers around is probably too distrubing. I also believe having the formatting of the error messages in the normal scop detection is not great, as it both adds unrelated stuff to the code, but also makes it harder to conditionally disable the error reporting. On the other side, I believe it is good to make the 'return false' expli...

Hi, Continuing with the saga of Digium vs MTNL Mumbai, looking for suggestions on handling incoming Caller-ID issues. The card manages to grab a couple of (random) digits of the incoming CID, but they're more or less useless. Is there any way to fix this? Asterisk 1.8.13, Dahdi 2.5.0.1 on Debian Testing (Wheezy), MTNL Mumbai. Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX410 4-port analog card (PCI-Express)

Hi all, I have attached a patch file to reduce the polly-detect overhead. My idea is to avoid calling TypeFinder in Non-DEBUG mode, so TypeFinder is only called in DEBUG mode with the DEBUG macro. This patch file did this work with following modifications: First, it keeps most of string information by replacing "<<" with "+" operation. For example, code like this:

...ion is probably not what we want. > >> Do you have any suggestion? > >I do. > >Your patch goes in the right direction and it helped to get a better >idea of what should be done. I think the first point that we learned is >that passing class pointers around is probably too distrubing. I also >believe having the formatting of the error messages in the normal scop >detection is not great, as it both adds unrelated stuff to the code, but >also makes it harder to conditionally disable the error reporting. On >the other side, I believe it is good to make the 'return...

Hi All, I am about to embark on a project that deals with allowing information archival, over time and seeing change over time as well. I can explain it a lot better, but I would certainly talk your ear off. I really don't have a lot of money to throw at the initial concept, but I have some. This device will host all of the operations for the first few months until I can afford to build a

On 07/14/2013 08:05 AM, Star Tan wrote: > I have found that the extremely expensive compile-time overhead comes from the string buffer operation for "INVALID" MACRO in the polly-detect pass. > Attached is a hack patch file that simply remove the string buffer operation. This patch file can significantly reduce compile-time overhead when compiling big source code. For example, for