search for: distrowatch

The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue. FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have LLVM 3.9 and GCC 4.9. NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM 3.8. Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that it also has LLVM 3.8. Going back to what Joerg said earlier. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=netbsd says NetBSD 7 ships with GCC 5.3, but Joerg said 4.8. Which is it? And even if it's 4.8, the same page also says NetBSD has LLVM 3.8. Is that not sufficient? BTW, C...

...gcc 4.2.1, then I think this entire discussion is kind of irrelevant, because they are already having to build a new toolchain to compile LLVM, since the minimum is currently 4.7. So for those people, I would imagine 4.7 vs. 4.9 makes no difference? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the table of the distrowatch page, but if FreeBSD 11 has clang 3.8 as you say, why does distrowatch say FreeBSD 10 and 11 have clang 3.9 <http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=freebsd>? On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 7:10 PM Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 10/2/2016 6...

...nd getting facts is important. #1 Tests for the features #2 Bug tracker to identify any regressions blocking updating #3 Buildbots to verify On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I wasn't able to find that information on the distrowatch page you linked, but I will assume that it is talking about the available ports, e.g. packages external to the FreeBSD base system. In the FreeBSD ports collection, we have clang 3.3 through 3.9 available, and a 4.0 trunk snapshot as of 2016-08-24. > > On the other hand, the base system is a...

...ures >> #2 Bug tracker to identify any regressions blocking updating >> #3 Buildbots to verify >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > I wasn't able to find that information on the distrowatch page you >> > linked, but I will assume that it is talking about the available ports, e.g. >> > packages external to the FreeBSD base system. In the FreeBSD ports >> > collection, we have clang 3.3 through 3.9 available, and a 4.0 trunk >> > snapshot as of 2016-...

...version 4.5.2 is Bind 9.11? Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS repo offers Bind9.10.3 and Debian Jessie is Bind9.9.5. Currently running Samba 4.5.0 (from source) on Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS. Does this suggestion mean I am limited to Samba version 4.5.1 until Ubuntu upgrades the bind9 version? I have been searching Distrowatch and none of the major distros are at Bind9.11, yet. Should I anticipate any problems upgrading to Samba 4.5.2 or is this a typo on the wiki page? -- _______________________________ Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

Hello list. I've just read this news (http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=02638) - in my opinion very good idea. What do you think? Regards.

...- Is there any reason to fear Red Hat bringing the hammer down and thus ruining the party? I'd love to see an FAQ or something to the effect that legally there's no way for Red Hat to block what CentOS is doing. #2 - Is the community strong? I'm new to the community and when I look on distrowatch it's way down the list. But is this accurate or is CentOS picking up steam? I get the feeling it's picking up steam. The reason this is important is because I'd hate to pick it only to watch it wither and have to go distro-hopping again. Once again, looking for stability. Any responses...

...ote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:09:08PM +0000, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: > > The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue. FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have LLVM > > 3.9 and GCC 4.9. NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM 3.8. > > Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that it also has LLVM > > 3.8. > > NetBSD 6.1.5 has GCC 4.5 in base, 7.0 has 4.8. Clang is not included the > default for either. Another feedback from a downstream user: in order to build our llvm-based compiler once and have it run on a large variety of Linux machines, we&...

A very nice RHEL Clone article is now available for non subscribers at Linux Weekly News by Ladislav Bodnar of http://distrowatch.org/ CentOS gets very good treatment in this article :) http://lwn.net/Articles/128952/ -- Johnny Hughes <http://www.HughesJR.com/>

A nice little insight into CentOS : http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature Cheers Didi p.s. Sorry if this has already been posted :) -- Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger http://contact.ribalba.de

i did Google and also searched CentOS web-site and CentOS 5 Release Notes but i did not find what GCC CentOS 5 uses. i need GCC 4.x for my C++ based project work. what GCC version CentOS 5 uses as default ? -- http://arnuld.blogspot.com/

Has anyone experienced the conversion of the aluminum chassis Mac G5 to a Linux box? Curious in Pennsylvania. I need to obtain the power cable somewhere to try it. It is a 64-bit monster, so seems like it is worth trying if I can find the weird cable it needs. No luck to date regarding the cable. Thanks. The Bears will never win until number six leaves.

Hi All, after looking around for info on XFS(the filesystem) and its use on CentOS and/or RHEL 4. There seems to be a lot of noise about 4K Stacks (especially on linux-xfs at oss.sgi.com). So what is the best way to get XFS working with CentOS 4.3 ? And not have something like this happening. A quote from the xfs list at sgi >On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 10:29am, Andrew Elwell wrote >

I haven't been following C++14 closely, but from hallway conversations at work it seems like 17 is the bigger win in terms of features. Is it worth waiting for 17 instead? Or, as we will only get a subset of 14 features anyway, just instead take a subset of 17 features? My only worry with 14 is that it's always going to be code churn in terms of using the new features. If they are worth

...(Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:21:50 +0100 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - i386 Released To: centos-announce at centos.org, distro at distrowatch.com Message-ID: <48F7DA9E.3030409 at centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed The single CD server install for CentOS 4.7 / i386 has now been released and is available from all active mirrors. The ISO is available on bit-torrent, via the torrent file : http://...

Guys, CentOS is not doing very well at this ranking site: http://www.distrorankings.com/ We need some good foo there, so if you like CentOS, go there and rank us ... {If you don't like CentOS then you are getting sleepy .... sleepy ..... You will not remember anything you read in this message} Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

...ns(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml > index 83e70a6..c0e1e44 100644 > --- a/customize/customize_run.ml > +++ b/customize/customize_run.ml > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ exec >>%s 2>&1 > in > > (* http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=package-management *) > - let guest_install_command packages = > + let rec guest_install_command packages = > let quoted_args = String.concat " " (List.map quote packages) in > match g#inspect_get_package_management root with > | &quo...

HI All, I?m new to Asterisk and also to Linux. I have a large IVR project that I?m about to embark on. I?m new to programming; new to Linux and new to Asterisk. I think I?m about to climb a steep learning curve. I have an existing IVR which is getting on for nine years old and is no longer supported by my vendor. I intend to replicate the system almost as is and then add additional

...e Bridge is meant to be the interface towards KWin. It is an internal interface and exporting it doesn't change the fact that it is internal. The change got introduced in a time when it was still common to use Compiz in the kde-workspaces. This has changed. None of the top ten distributions on distrowatch are shipping the integration parts of Compiz in an up to date version. Most distros are still on Compiz 0.8, which requires manual patching to keep up with changes in the decoration API. Distros on Compiz 0.9 are not shipping the KDE integration - this includes Ubuntu. Given this development it is...

...k --- centos-request at caosity.org wrote: > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:30:33 +0000 > From: Lance Davis <lance at uklinux.net> > Subject: [Centos] CentOS 3.4 - i386 - Single CD > Server version > release, > To: centos at caosity.org > Cc: distro at distrowatch.com > Message-ID: > <1106350231.19545.82.camel at centos3.wellhouse> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > For Release: January 21, 2005 > > The CentOS Team is pleased to announce the official > release of a new > single CD Server version o...