search for: distrib_id

Changes from v2 to v3: - split_key_value_strings renamed to parse_key_value_strings Changes from v1 to v2: - split the "simple unquoting" as helper - pass the unquoting function to split_key_value_strings - use right unquoting function when applying split_key_value_strings Pino Toscano (2): daemon: add split_key_value_strings helper daemon: use parse_key_value_strings

Add a simple helper to turn a list of strings into key/value pairs, splitting by '='. --- daemon/utils.ml | 15 +++++++++++++++ daemon/utils.mli | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/daemon/utils.ml b/daemon/utils.ml index d87ad75db..fd1681a86 100644 --- a/daemon/utils.ml +++ b/daemon/utils.ml @@ -229,3 +229,18 @@ let unix_canonical_path path = let path =

Changes from v1 to v2: - split the "simple unquoting" as helper - pass the unquoting function to split_key_value_strings - use right unquoting function when applying split_key_value_strings Pino Toscano (2): daemon: add split_key_value_strings helper daemon: use split_key_value_strings daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml | 93 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- daemon/md.ml

...t; true > + ) parse_os_release should also reset the version to Some (0, 0) (instead of None) in case the distro is one of the "rolling" ones (only Void at the moment) -- see also src/inspect-fs-unix.c, lines 240 and on. > +(* Ubuntu has /etc/lsb-release containing: > + * DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu # Distro > + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 # Version > + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid > + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" # Product name > + * > + * [Ubuntu-derived ...] Linux Mint was found to...

...t;@' '@<:@:upper:@:>@'`" - AS_CASE([$DISTRO], - [FEDORA | RHEL | CENTOS],[DISTRO=REDHAT], - [OPENSUSE | SLED | SLES],[DISTRO=SUSE], - [ARCH],[DISTRO=ARCHLINUX]) -elif test -f /etc/debian_version; then - DISTRO=DEBIAN - if grep -q 'DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu' /etc/lsb-release 2>&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD; then - DISTRO=UBUNTU - fi -elif test -f /etc/arch-release; then - DISTRO=ARCHLINUX -elif test -f /etc/SuSE-release; then - DISTRO=SUSE -elif test -f /etc/frugalware-release; then - DISTRO=FRUGALWARE -elif test -f /etc/mage...

...e logfile inline. Localhost from which we are connecting: uname -aLinux iwf0044110 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root at iwf0044110:/home1/parakkal/COLLABNET_11.10_NEW/hpsw-oa/PA/numsVob/linux/2.2/Linux2.6_64_debug# cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS" root at iwf0044110:/home1/parakkal/COLLABNET_11.10_NEW/hpsw-oa/PA/numsVob/linux/2.2/Linux2.6_64_debug# virsh version Compiled against library: libvir 0.9.8 Using library: libvir 0.9.8 Using API: Q...

...n details: - security = user - an idmap entry is unnecessary - disable netbios = yes works fine - pretty sure nmbd is unnecessary as well. Unfortunately the same smb.conf/sssd.conf configuration does not work on Ubuntu 18.04: root at kraken:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=18.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=bionic DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS" root at kraken:/var/log/samba# smbd --version Version 4.7.6-Ubuntu It appears there were some major changes between Samba 4.7.6 and Samba 4.8.3 ? On the functional CentOS system...

...t;@' '@<:@:upper:@:>@'`" + AS_CASE([$DISTRO], + [FEDORA | RHEL | CENTOS],[DISTRO=REDHAT], + [OPENSUSE | SLED | SLES],[DISTRO=SUSE], + [ARCH],[DISTRO=ARCHLINUX]) +elif test -f /etc/debian_version; then DISTRO=DEBIAN if grep -q 'DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu' /etc/lsb-release 2>&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD; then DISTRO=UBUNTU fi -fi -if test -f /etc/arch-release; then +elif test -f /etc/arch-release; then DISTRO=ARCHLINUX -fi -if test -f /etc/SuSE-release; then +elif test -f /etc/SuSE-release; then DISTRO=SUSE -fi -if te...

Here is the usage for Fedora usage: mkinitrd [--version] [-v] [-f] [--preload <module>] [--omit-scsi-modules] [--omit-raid-modules] [--omit-lvm-modules] [--with=<module>] [--image-version] [--fstab=<fstab>] [--nocompress] [--builtin=<module>] [--nopivot] <initrd-image> <kernel-version> (ex: mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.2.5-15.img

Hi, Dovecot version : 2.2.22 (fe789d2) Operating system : DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=16.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=xenial DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS" CPU architecture : Linux 4.4.67-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 4.4.67-92 (Fri, 23 Jun 2017 08:22:06 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux FIle system : local UID GID Aug 17 11:47:28 azizee dovecot: imap(...

...se packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] fortunes_1.4-0 username@computer:~$ uname -a Linux computer 2.6.28-19-generic #65-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 16 14:24:42 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux username@computer:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=jaunty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 9.04" ________________________________ Dr Vincent Chouraki Assistant hospitalier universitaire Service d'épidémiologie régional CHRU de Lille, France [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...to fix by changing 4 lines in the configure script from "-fpic" to -fPIC", as shown in the patch below. I saw this failure on an Intel x86-64 server, running Ubuntu 6.06: $ uname -srvm Linux 2.6.20.4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 31 07:46:01 EDT 2007 x86_64 $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.06 DISTRIB_CODENAME=dapper DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS" $ grep name /proc/cpuinfo model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz $ dpkg -l libc6 ||/ N...

...ne.exe fixme:msi:MSI_OpenDatabaseW open failed r = 80030050 for L"C:\\windows\ \temp\\msic3e4.tmp" thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ wine --version wine-1.0.1 thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=karmic DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 9.10" thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thanks, Thufir

...'m trying to do. I'm not even a LLVM contributor, so I don't feel responsible for a good or bad performances of LLVM. :) Anyway, thanks for pointing this target differences. After some hours at recompiling gcc, here we are : Some information on the test platform : cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=jaunty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 9.04" uname -a Linux zaraki 2.6.28-15-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 18:40:08 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux /proc/cpuinfo dual core Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU X6800 @ 2.93GHz (cache size 4096) llvm-gcc -v Using b...

...uestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs, * DISTRIB_CODENAME=Henry_Farman * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Mandriva Linux 2010.1" * Mandriva also has a normal release file called /etc/mandriva-release. + * + * CoreOS has a /etc/lsb-release link to /usr/share/coreos/lsb-release containing: + * DISTRIB_ID=CoreOS + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=647.0.0 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME="Red Dog" + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="CoreOS 647.0.0" */ static int -parse_lsb_release (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) +parse_lsb_release (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs, const char *filename) { - const c...

...uestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs, * DISTRIB_CODENAME=Henry_Farman * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Mandriva Linux 2010.1" * Mandriva also has a normal release file called /etc/mandriva-release. + * + * CoreOS has a /etc/lsb-release link to /usr/share/coreos/lsb-release containing: + * DISTRIB_ID=CoreOS + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=647.0.0 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME="Red Dog" + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="CoreOS 647.0.0" */ static int -parse_lsb_release (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) +parse_lsb_release (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs, const char *filename) { - const c...

On Tuesday 15 September 2009 08:16, Olivier Meurant wrote: > llvm-gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu > > gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: i486-linux-gnu Different targets. It's no surprise 486 code would perform much worse than i686 code. These compilers need to target the same architecture. Ideally the Makefile would include

I ran dovecot -a and the blizzard of data seemed ok to my limited knowledge. Is there another log I should look into to trace this error down? Dovecot and system info: thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ dovecot --version 2.0.19 thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS" thufir at dur:~$ testing postfix & dovecot (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/dovecot-postfix): root at dur:/etc/postfix# root at dur:/etc/postfix# telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1...

...;sles" | "sled" -> Some DISTRO_SLES + | "ubuntu" -> Some DISTRO_UBUNTU + | "void" -> Some DISTRO_VOID_LINUX + | value -> + eprintf "/etc/os-release: unknown ID=%s\n" value; + None + +(* Ubuntu has /etc/lsb-release containing: + * DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu # Distro + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 # Version + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" # Product name + * + * [Ubuntu-derived ...] Linux Mint was found to have this: + * DISTRIB_...

...;sles" | "sled" -> Some DISTRO_SLES + | "ubuntu" -> Some DISTRO_UBUNTU + | "void" -> Some DISTRO_VOID_LINUX + | value -> + eprintf "/etc/os-release: unknown ID=%s\n" value; + None + +(* Ubuntu has /etc/lsb-release containing: + * DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu # Distro + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 # Version + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" # Product name + * + * [Ubuntu-derived ...] Linux Mint was found to have this: + * DISTRIB_...