search for: dissenting

http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/01/the-internet-filter-coming-to-the-us-with-barely-any-dissent/ The US Congress spent yesterday packing up and heading home for mid-term re-election campaigns, having failed its most important job???passing the annual budget. But even this deadlocked Congress is capable of doing what the Australian Labor Party cannot???pass a mandatory ISP-based Internet

> On May 9, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > 2017-05-09 9:03 GMT-07:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk <mailto:David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>>: > On 9 May 2017, at 16:59, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I'm not

Lacking any dissenting opinions, I wanted to give a heads up to folks: I plan to do the two major renamings I mentioned above this weekend. I'll do it over the weekend to try to minimize the number of patches that folks have outstanding touching files in those trees. I'll respond later this week with more detai...

...ew simple Pat classes. Semantic information such as isBranch is still represented in the instruction definition meaning there isn't a complete split between MC-layer and codegen concerns. The Mips{64,32}r6InstrInfo.td does also factor out this information. This seems less compelling to me, but dissenting opinions are welcome! I've demonstrated both the "conventional" approach <https://gist.github.com/asb/0c61ebc131076c6186052c29968a491d#file-riscvinstrinfo_conventional-td> and the "separate patterns" approach <https://gist.github.com/asb/0c61ebc131076c6186052c29968...

I''m using god* to monitor my mongrels. God looks at pid files to know the status of the cluster. It seems as though mongrel does not write a pid file until it has loaded the entire rails/project environment, which in my case, takes upwards of 90 seconds. Meanwhile, god is freaking out because it thinks that there aren''t mongrels running, and it tries to start them. Thankfully I

i was just lo0king at the winamp3 forums . there's a wish list , and i was the very first pers0n to request OGG ! but there's h0pe .. -- We're Counting We are now counting individual requests so see what should be high on the priority list. So, if you have a feature you want, add it here. Better yet though, use the Search feature at the bottom. If you see a thread that matches

On Thu, April 9, 2015 13:12, zep wrote: > frankly, this blows my mind. not long ago there was a huge kerfuffle > over the change to only allow (as someone defined it 'secure') certain > passwords, requiring numbers, special characters, some minimum length > and that -had to be done- because people didn't use proper passwords > and couldn't be trusted to just use

Hi, Apart from whether fast-isel should be enabled or disabled (I think enabled, personally), I haven't heard any dissenting voices about how to attack the merge problem yet. Tim, am I correct in saying that you believe AArch64 -> ARM64 is the right way to go? Does anyone disagree with that approach? Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs....

I have a magical proposal for the anti-magic web framework. Controller methods do not use arguments and yet expect arguments. This is handled through this params hash because we don''t know in advance what parameters a client could pass to Merb. But in almost every instance, it is too much to know all the query parameters - one doesn''t care if the user threw in an extraneous

I’m just now catching up on this massive thread after being on vacation last week, and I have a few thoughts I’d like to share. First and foremost please don’t consider lack of dissent on the thread as presence of consensus. The various git-related threads on LLVM-dev lately have been so active and contentious that I think a lot of people are zoning out on the conversations. As supporting

>>> strongly disagree. I'm appalled to see that sentence here. >> > >> > Come on! >> > >>> >> The overhead is significant for any large vector and it is in particular unnecessary since in .C you have to allocate*and copy* space even for results (twice!). Also it is very error-prone, because you have no information about the length of

...us, a typical (for me) 3 hour recording is very roughly 500 MB. I want to compress these and burn them to CD. My goal is to have them for many years (yes, I know I will have to watch media degradation). Thus, a bunch of questions. Question 1) I know this is probably the wrong place to ask for a dissenting view, but are these .ogg files going to be easily readable in 10 years? It seems like .ogg has reached critical mass, and it seems (from what I have read) that the format's specification will be stable, but I would like to ask. mp3 is the obvious alternative. I prefer Vorbis compression on &...

On 27 July 2016 at 17:47, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > First and foremost please don’t consider lack of dissent on the thread as > presence of consensus. Hi Chris, First things first: I give you my word that I will be yelling louder than others if this ever happens. (I can be *very* loud! :) People can push and yell all they want, changes like

Hey everyone, We're coming up on the next merge window, and I only have a couple tiny fixes for ocfs2. I thought I'd list up what I know is outstanding, and I was hoping to find out if I was missing anything. If I am, I need to get it in linux-next and set for the merge window ASAP. - metaecc-stats This is a trivial patch I put together to track errors seen by the blockcheck code.

I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has dissented into a flame war of what is OSS. Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money on ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put efforts into a project when there is no reward? Especially when most of the effort is by a single individual. Secondly there comes a

Hi Chris, On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:37 PM Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The thing I use normally only shows the first N lines by default (I don’t > know off hand what N is). Honestly, I don’t feel very strongly about the > specific order, but it’s not useful when somebody proposes something on the > list, and nobody voices any dissent

...s me feel uncomfortable. Many many people interpret that to mean those with the most experience/social capital are best equipped to make decisions. Not only is that not always true, it leads to an organization with structural barriers to newcomers, those with different/less common backgrounds and dissenting views. I definitely do not want to go for "meritocracy." > Hoewever, I'd strongly advise against a simple voting system. Agreed! > We also need to be scalable. If we have a decision that only affects a > small part of the code, we can handle in the sub-community (like we...

...ings, though it probably will work. The dovecot people seemed to think so. I'm giving this a rest to let my brain cool down. Perhaps I'll try it later. Please weight in on Rowland's comment about restricting documentation on kerberos authentication to domain members. I've posted a dissenting view, but maybe I'm alone in my opinion that there should be no issue running a mail server on the same box as the AD/DC. Perhaps few people do that, but my feeling is that most people do that. Feedback by you and others as to real-world use could be valuable. --Mark

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > We’re talking about verbose output right? Verbose isn’t the default. > I'm fairly certain the issue in this thread is just the verbosity of -dump-input=fail. Yes, -vv makes it even more verbose by annotating input lines with good matches, etc., but that's not part of the "new

On 29 July 2016 at 15:26, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I believe David Chisnall up-thread cited a difference in checkout times > on the order of a handful of seconds versus a couple of minutes. While > naively it might seem not a big deal, over time and depending on what you > are trying to do yes it can be a big burden. TL;DR: This thread