search for: dissenters

http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/01/the-internet-filter-coming-to-the-us-with-barely-any-dissent/ The US Congress spent yesterday packing up and heading home for mid-term re-election campaigns, having failed its most important job???passing the annual budget. But even this deadlocked Congress is capable of doing what the Australian Labor Party cannot???pass a mandatory ISP-based Internet

> On May 9, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > 2017-05-09 9:03 GMT-07:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk <mailto:David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>>: > On 9 May 2017, at 16:59, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I'm not

Lacking any dissenting opinions, I wanted to give a heads up to folks: I plan to do the two major renamings I mentioned above this weekend. I'll do it over the weekend to try to minimize the number of patches that folks have outstanding touching files in those trees. I'll respond later this week with more details to help sort out any last questions of naming. It looks like the only real

As many of you know, I have a growing series of patches for a RISC-V backend under/awaiting review <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/?authors=asb&order=updated>, <http://github.com/lowrisc/riscv-llvm>. I'll be posting a larger status update on that work either later today or tomorrow, this RFC focuses on an issue that came up during review which I think may benefit from

I''m using god* to monitor my mongrels. God looks at pid files to know the status of the cluster. It seems as though mongrel does not write a pid file until it has loaded the entire rails/project environment, which in my case, takes upwards of 90 seconds. Meanwhile, god is freaking out because it thinks that there aren''t mongrels running, and it tries to start them. Thankfully I

i was just lo0king at the winamp3 forums . there's a wish list , and i was the very first pers0n to request OGG ! but there's h0pe .. -- We're Counting We are now counting individual requests so see what should be high on the priority list. So, if you have a feature you want, add it here. Better yet though, use the Search feature at the bottom. If you see a thread that matches

On Thu, April 9, 2015 13:12, zep wrote: > frankly, this blows my mind. not long ago there was a huge kerfuffle > over the change to only allow (as someone defined it 'secure') certain > passwords, requiring numbers, special characters, some minimum length > and that -had to be done- because people didn't use proper passwords > and couldn't be trusted to just use

Hi, Apart from whether fast-isel should be enabled or disabled (I think enabled, personally), I haven't heard any dissenting voices about how to attack the merge problem yet. Tim, am I correct in saying that you believe AArch64 -> ARM64 is the right way to go? Does anyone disagree with that approach? Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at

I have a magical proposal for the anti-magic web framework. Controller methods do not use arguments and yet expect arguments. This is handled through this params hash because we don''t know in advance what parameters a client could pass to Merb. But in almost every instance, it is too much to know all the query parameters - one doesn''t care if the user threw in an extraneous

I’m just now catching up on this massive thread after being on vacation last week, and I have a few thoughts I’d like to share. First and foremost please don’t consider lack of dissent on the thread as presence of consensus. The various git-related threads on LLVM-dev lately have been so active and contentious that I think a lot of people are zoning out on the conversations. As supporting

>>> strongly disagree. I'm appalled to see that sentence here. >> > >> > Come on! >> > >>> >> The overhead is significant for any large vector and it is in particular unnecessary since in .C you have to allocate*and copy* space even for results (twice!). Also it is very error-prone, because you have no information about the length of

Apologies; a filter mistriggered on the original send of this message. Monty Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:11:16 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200301100611.BAA12395@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu> To: vorbis@xiph.org From: ben-extra@MIT.EDU Subject: Hi, I am hoping for some guidance. I have a *bunch* of audio in the form of realaudio streams. As is, they are of a quality similar to fair AM quality.

On 27 July 2016 at 17:47, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > First and foremost please don’t consider lack of dissent on the thread as > presence of consensus. Hi Chris, First things first: I give you my word that I will be yelling louder than others if this ever happens. (I can be *very* loud! :) People can push and yell all they want, changes like

...g the 2.6.31 merge window. I'm expecting 2.6.32 though. - reflink The generic reflink system call patch seems to have evolved as needed. I'm ready to push it upstream, but I don't think it goes without some consumer. That is, I push it with the refcount tree code. I'm open to dissenters, though, and I'm going to be asking VFS people about it. That's what I have. What'd I miss? Joel -- "Gone to plant a weeping willow On the bank's green edge it will roll, roll, roll. Sing a lulaby beside the waters. Lovers come and go, the river roll, roll, rolls.&quo...

I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has dissented into a flame war of what is OSS. Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money on ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put efforts into a project when there is no reward? Especially when most of the effort is by a single individual. Secondly there comes a

Hi Chris, On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:37 PM Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The thing I use normally only shows the first N lines by default (I don’t > know off hand what N is). Honestly, I don’t feel very strongly about the > specific order, but it’s not useful when somebody proposes something on the > list, and nobody voices any dissent

Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > If we want to go for meritocracy, which I think most people would > agree, then it would have to be people that already represent the > community, internally or externally. Given your close attention to representation I know that you have all the best intentions here, so please take this in the spirit of productive

> To: samba at lists.samba.org > From: Achim Gottinger <achim at ag-web.biz> > Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:29:02 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Samba] How to GSSAPI/Kerberos authenticate with Dovecot > > Am 04.07.2016 um 01:34 schrieb Mark Foley: > > After a nearly 2-year struggle to get Dovecot to do either NTLM or GSSAPI authentication with > > Samba4 AD/DC, I believe

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > We’re talking about verbose output right? Verbose isn’t the default. > I'm fairly certain the issue in this thread is just the verbosity of -dump-input=fail. Yes, -vv makes it even more verbose by annotating input lines with good matches, etc., but that's not part of the "new

On 29 July 2016 at 15:26, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I believe David Chisnall up-thread cited a difference in checkout times > on the order of a handful of seconds versus a couple of minutes. While > naively it might seem not a big deal, over time and depending on what you > are trying to do yes it can be a big burden. TL;DR: This thread