search for: dissembler

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dissembler".

Did you mean: diassembler
2019 Mar 26
4
GSoC19: Improve LLVM binary utilities
(Adding just a bit to Jake's response) On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:31 AM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Seiya, > > What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy is the >> most crucial work in this summer. > > > This is an opinion that will vary a lot from person to person. > +1! And don't forget that
2010 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] How the LLVM tools work together
...much easier to tell what semantics changed when values are renamed. * llvm-ld is really just a driver for the system linker. It can also produce scripts that run the bitcode via lli. * llvm-link links llvm-ir files together. * llvm-mc is the machine code playground. It can be used as an assembler, dissembler, and other things. * llvm-nm is classic unix nm for llvm-ir. It dumps the symbol table. And I don't know what the rest are for exactly. You don't need to know about any of these to use clang or llvm-gcc, but they can be useful when playing with llvm. - Michael Spencer
2012 Sep 19
4
correlating matrices
Hi, thank you for taking the time and reading my question. My question is twofold: 1. I have several matrices with variables and one matrix with water levels. I want to predict the water level with the data in the other matrices. Basically, * mod<-lm(matrix1 ~ matrix2+matrix3)* ( What looks like a minus is meant to be the wiggly minus.) Of course I could dissemble the matrices and paste
2010 Oct 28
4
[LLVMdev] How the LLVM tools work together
Hi, I've been reading through some of the documentation and I'm a little confused. What I'm wondering is if someone could explain how the different tools in LLVM (llvmc, clang, llvm-gcc, llvm-ar, etc.) work together to go from the C code I create through to a running executable (after linking). Apologies if this isn't the right list. I'm not a compiler developer so I'm
2017 Nov 30
2
PPC64 Disassembler
> But where is the flat set? Maybe I can debug and check what is going on. The MCInstrDesc are in a table in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCGenInstrInfo.inc of your build directory. > Some additional information: > > MCInst opcode: 0x7cb > Decode Index: 0x1e I had assumed this would have dissembled to '// Inst #234 = BC' which does have the branch flag set, but I think that
2014 Aug 26
6
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump
I would like to improve llvm-objdump. However, many unit tests depend precisely on the current output, making the picture a little tricky. My experience is limited to ELF format objects, so experts in other formats please sanity check. Suggested changes: 1) Symbolize conditional branch targets. Currently, llvm-objdump prints branch targets numerically regardless of -symbolize. 2) Make
2017 Nov 30
2
PPC64 Disassembler
The `isBranch` flag is already set on the branch instructions. Furthermore, we do use the `isBranch()` query in a few places in the PPC back end, so this does work. Perhaps there's something specific about the lldb usage? Is it somehow possible that the `isBranch()` query is called on the wrong instruction? Would you be able to provide a test case that reproduces the issue? On Thu, Nov 30,
2006 Apr 30
82
Mongrel 3.15, Ubuntu and Park place (S3)
Hello. I installed under Ubuntu (Dapper) Park Place. I followed the instructions given at the RedHanded site. I get the following mongrel error when launching the application: ** Please login in with `admin'' and password `pass@word1'' ** You should change the default password or delete the admin at soonest chance!/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.12.5/lib/mongrel.rb:584:in