Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dissembler".
Did you mean:
diassembler
2019 Mar 26
4
GSoC19: Improve LLVM binary utilities
(Adding just a bit to Jake's response)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:31 AM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Seiya,
>
> What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy is the
>> most crucial work in this summer.
>
>
> This is an opinion that will vary a lot from person to person.
>
+1! And don't forget that
2010 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] How the LLVM tools work together
...much easier to tell what semantics changed
when values are renamed.
* llvm-ld is really just a driver for the system linker. It can also
produce scripts that run the bitcode via lli.
* llvm-link links llvm-ir files together.
* llvm-mc is the machine code playground. It can be used as an
assembler, dissembler, and other things.
* llvm-nm is classic unix nm for llvm-ir. It dumps the symbol table.
And I don't know what the rest are for exactly.
You don't need to know about any of these to use clang or llvm-gcc,
but they can be useful when playing with llvm.
- Michael Spencer
2012 Sep 19
4
correlating matrices
Hi,
thank you for taking the time and reading my question. My question is
twofold:
1. I have several matrices with variables and one matrix with water levels.
I want to predict the water level with the data in the other matrices.
Basically,
* mod<-lm(matrix1 ~ matrix2+matrix3)*
( What looks like a minus is meant to be the wiggly minus.)
Of course I could dissemble the matrices and paste
2010 Oct 28
4
[LLVMdev] How the LLVM tools work together
Hi,
I've been reading through some of the documentation and I'm a little confused.
What I'm wondering is if someone could explain how the different tools in LLVM (llvmc, clang, llvm-gcc, llvm-ar, etc.) work together to go from the C code I create through to a running executable (after linking).
Apologies if this isn't the right list. I'm not a compiler developer so I'm
2017 Nov 30
2
PPC64 Disassembler
> But where is the flat set? Maybe I can debug and check what is going on.
The MCInstrDesc are in a table in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCGenInstrInfo.inc
of your build directory.
> Some additional information:
>
> MCInst opcode: 0x7cb
> Decode Index: 0x1e
I had assumed this would have dissembled to '// Inst #234 = BC' which does
have the branch flag set, but I think that
2014 Aug 26
6
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump
I would like to improve llvm-objdump. However, many unit tests depend
precisely on the current output, making the picture a little tricky.
My experience is limited to ELF format objects, so experts in other
formats please sanity check.
Suggested changes:
1) Symbolize conditional branch targets. Currently, llvm-objdump
prints branch targets numerically regardless of -symbolize.
2) Make
2017 Nov 30
2
PPC64 Disassembler
The `isBranch` flag is already set on the branch instructions. Furthermore,
we do use the `isBranch()` query in a few places in the PPC back end, so
this does work. Perhaps there's something specific about the lldb usage? Is
it somehow possible that the `isBranch()` query is called on the wrong
instruction?
Would you be able to provide a test case that reproduces the issue?
On Thu, Nov 30,
2006 Apr 30
82
Mongrel 3.15, Ubuntu and Park place (S3)
Hello. I installed under Ubuntu (Dapper) Park Place. I followed the
instructions given at the RedHanded site. I get the following mongrel
error when launching the application:
** Please login in with `admin'' and password `pass@word1''
** You should change the default password or delete the admin at
soonest chance!/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.12.5/lib/mongrel.rb:584:in