search for: dissembl

(Adding just a bit to Jake's response) On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:31 AM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Seiya, > > What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy is the >> most crucial work in this summer. > > > This is an opinion that will vary a lot from person to person. > +1! And don't forget that

...much easier to tell what semantics changed when values are renamed. * llvm-ld is really just a driver for the system linker. It can also produce scripts that run the bitcode via lli. * llvm-link links llvm-ir files together. * llvm-mc is the machine code playground. It can be used as an assembler, dissembler, and other things. * llvm-nm is classic unix nm for llvm-ir. It dumps the symbol table. And I don't know what the rest are for exactly. You don't need to know about any of these to use clang or llvm-gcc, but they can be useful when playing with llvm. - Michael Spencer

...question is twofold: 1. I have several matrices with variables and one matrix with water levels. I want to predict the water level with the data in the other matrices. Basically, * mod<-lm(matrix1 ~ matrix2+matrix3)* ( What looks like a minus is meant to be the wiggly minus.) Of course I could dissemble the matrices and paste their columns into one long, long vector. But the method above gives reasonable results. Are there any methodological objections against doing this? 2. After having done the regression I now want to make a prediction. Thus given the coefficients of my regression mod and mat...

Hi, I've been reading through some of the documentation and I'm a little confused. What I'm wondering is if someone could explain how the different tools in LLVM (llvmc, clang, llvm-gcc, llvm-ar, etc.) work together to go from the C code I create through to a running executable (after linking). Apologies if this isn't the right list. I'm not a compiler developer so I'm

> But where is the flat set? Maybe I can debug and check what is going on. The MCInstrDesc are in a table in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCGenInstrInfo.inc of your build directory. > Some additional information: > > MCInst opcode: 0x7cb > Decode Index: 0x1e I had assumed this would have dissembled to '// Inst #234 = BC' which does have the branch flag set, but I think that opcode is for XXLNOR instruction. Could it be disassembling to `// Inst #2014 = gBC` instead which does not have the branch flag set? Adding Hal and Ulrich in case they have some extra insight here. Test case: &...

I would like to improve llvm-objdump. However, many unit tests depend precisely on the current output, making the picture a little tricky. My experience is limited to ELF format objects, so experts in other formats please sanity check. Suggested changes: 1) Symbolize conditional branch targets. Currently, llvm-objdump prints branch targets numerically regardless of -symbolize. 2) Make

The `isBranch` flag is already set on the branch instructions. Furthermore, we do use the `isBranch()` query in a few places in the PPC back end, so this does work. Perhaps there's something specific about the lldb usage? Is it somehow possible that the `isBranch()` query is called on the wrong instruction? Would you be able to provide a test case that reproduces the issue? On Thu, Nov 30,

Hello. I installed under Ubuntu (Dapper) Park Place. I followed the instructions given at the RedHanded site. I get the following mongrel error when launching the application: ** Please login in with `admin'' and password `pass@word1'' ** You should change the default password or delete the admin at soonest chance!/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.12.5/lib/mongrel.rb:584:in