search for: disputandum

I dont beleave it. That 5 years old now, normaly i'll dig into it, but exim... I dropped exim about 15 years ago.. First thing i do on debian... apt-get install --purge postfix That installs postfix and removes exim and purges exims config.. ;-) The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or 3269

.... */ convention used in C? Well maybe you simply *can't* get the "*/" string within a block of C code, but still .... If "#{....}#" runs this risk, then some other construction which doesn't run the risk could be used. > I like the current rule: De gustibus non disputandum. > any line starting with # is a comment. > (Actually the rule is a bit more subtle than that, but it's close.) > If I want to comment out a block, I can spend a long time typing # at > the start of every line, or I can ask my editor to do it. I don't need > to worry if...

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I dont beleave it. Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, > Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or 3269 ) No, but now yes and does not work: gaio at albus:~$ ldapsearch -x -H ldap://vdcsv1:3268/ -b DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it "(uid=...

On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 11:08 +0100, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > I dont beleave it. > > Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > > > > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, > > Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or 3269 ) > > No, but now yes and does not work: Yes, GC is just as restricted as the normal ports, just read-only...

On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:08:26 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > I dont beleave it. > > Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > > > > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want > > access without auth, Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 > > or 3269 ) > > No, but now yes and does not work: > > gaio at albus:~$ ldapsearch -x -H ldap://vdcs...

...gurgitates the previous thread before getting to the point of the message arguably interferes with proper understanding no less than top-posting does. I am unaware of any scientific study that purports to support either position. So, in the absence of that I conclude: De gustibus non est disputandum. At this point the practice, particularly for archived mailing lists, is little more than dogmatic adherence to a style that serves only to distinguish the 'in group' from the 'other'. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive d...

Attention R users, especially those that are experienced enough to be opinionated, I need your input. Consider the following simple plot: x <- rnorm(100) y <- rnorm(100) plot(x, y, bty='n') A colleague (and dreaded SAS user) commented that she thought that my plots could be "cleaned up" by connecting the X and Y axes. I know that I can do that with bty='l' but I

On 02/09/2017 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > On 03/09/17 03:56, William Dunlap via R-help wrote: >> Is the reason you want a block comment containing code (as opposed to >> arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out >> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you only need to >> change code at the start of the comment,

I intend to release a project I wrote with Rails. What is the right licensing scheme for a web application (content managing system) which could grow with plugins and add-ons ? Personally, I would prefer the GPL but does that mean any add-on to the CMS (like task management) will have to be GPL ? If some people contribute to the code could it still be double-licenced so that the people who