search for: disproportionately

...iding memory costs for input files (esp. >>> minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of >>> implementing this just to do those measurements. >> >> If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library >> support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing >> with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. > > This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it quite hard to see this as an acceptable position on llvm-dev. Why? What is wrong with setting priorities and o...

...ales of a given species tend to co-occur in a given sampling unit more frequently than expected by chance. I'm thinking about using a binomial distribution with p as the sex ratio of the entire population. So, even though the population sex ratio is close to 50:50, each sampling unit would have disproportionately more males than females. Given that the test is not about p per se, how would you go about testing this hypothesis? (by the way, the total number of individuals in each sampling unit might not be the same). Thanks!Jonathan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t strategies for avoiding memory costs for input files (esp. >> minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of >> implementing this just to do those measurements. > > If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library > support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing > with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it quite hard to see this as an acceptable position on llvm-dev. — Mehdio

...or input files (esp. >>>> minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of >>>> implementing this just to do those measurements. >>> >>> If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library >>> support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing >>> with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. >> >> This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it quite hard to see this as an acceptable position on llvm-dev. > > Why? What is wrong with s...

Hi all, I'm a little bit worried about the sheer size of the resulting binaries of a project using LLVM. The medium large project for which I'm planning to use it (which currently uses a custom dynamic code generator), produces a compact 1.6 MB binary. When I compile LLVM's simple 'Fibonacci' example project the executable is 2.6 MB. I realize LLVM is a complex and

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Mikhail Zolotukhin > <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Davide, > > > > Thanks for the analysis, it's really interesting! And I'm really glad > that we now put more and more attention at the compile time! >

On Mon, April 17, 2017 17:13, Warren Young wrote: > > Also, I???ll remind the list that one of the *prior* times the systemd > topic came up, I was the one reminding people that most of our jobs > summarize as ???Cope with change.??? > At some point 'coping with change' is discovered to consume a disproportionate amount of resources for the benefits obtained. In my sole

...do > w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding memory costs for input files (esp. > minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of > implementing this just to do those measurements. If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. Cheers, Rafael

...gotten to the point > >>>>> of > >>>>> implementing this just to do those measurements. > >>>> > >>>> If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of > >>>> library > >>>> support is already disproportionately painful and prevents > >>>> easier sharing > >>>> with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is > >>>> done. > >>> > >>> This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it > >>> quite hard...

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: > But this is not a technical argument. As a project, we rarely write programs, as such. We generally create reusable components that happen to have driver executables. At least long term, I think there's consensus that this is the best path. If we're going to make a different choice in this case, we need concrete reasons. We should discuss

Am 16. Juni 2019 um 15:53 Uhr +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > You will save yourself from world of hurt if you use a dummy ca to sign > you smartcard cert. You can try without generating a CRL. I see. I've done that now, but the effort required seems to be disproportionate. I'm just a single person. Requiring a full-blown CA setup is like cracking breakfast eggs with a

...>>>>> minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of >>>>> implementing this just to do those measurements. >>>> >>>> If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library >>>> support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing >>>> with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. >>> >>> This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it quite hard to see this as an acceptable position on llvm-dev. >> >> Why?...

Hi, I received a small flurry of buildbot emails yesterday. Most of them seem to be repeats of previous failures and buildbot only mailed them to me because the previous build raised an exception instead of failing. However I noticed a couple configuration/system issues amongst them: * arxan_raphael is consistently hitting the 20 minute no-output timeout when running the link command

Ok I know this is off topic, but since you guys are usualy so helpful, I thought I''d try here first. Building a Rails App and one of the things we''ve done is put a CSS class of; * { font-family:"Lucida Grande",verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; margin:0pt; padding:0pt; } Now the problem is that the padding setting, for one reason or another is killing my select

Hi dovecot-list, just a easy question today ;) Customer did on Server a PCI-Test to test security to fit worldpay requirements. They found a critical risk at pop3s. (and some other things) This is the Textmesage: ############ Family: Remote Shell Access Critical 993/tcp 11875 Description: The remote host responded to an unrequested SSL Certificate. The remote SSL server should have sent back

...elieve that in CodeGen/X86/lsr-i386.ll we are hoisting into the wrong loop now, but I'm not sure. The other failure is in CodeGen/Thumb2/v8_IT_5.ll is different block placement. Which is a bit odd. The frequencies given by my changes are certainly different, but the body of the loop is given a disproportionately larger frequency than the others (much like in the original case). Though, I think what's going on here is that my changes are causing the smaller frequencies to be saturated down to 1: Original: float-to-int: min = 0.0000004768367035, max = 2047.994141, factor = 16777232.0 Printing analysis...

I would have replied to this thread sooner, but I was busy adding more instcombines. :) The motivation for r289855 is in the commit msg (I'm out of the office and can't look things up conveniently). Feel free to revert that and the follow ups, however, if that patch caused a noticeable slowdown, then it suggests we have a bigger problem?...that's a simple matcher (no value tracking

...at line 16 of the example isn''t returning the right thing; it should be an AssociationCollection of OrderAddress. That''s where I''m starting to wonder if I''m spending too much time on something that is probably simple enough that it''s already working but disproportionately hard to write an RSpec example for (because the existing create_order_from_post method has no tests or examples and thus isn''t easy to test -- witness the 32 lines, modulo blank lines, of stubbing just to get the example to run). Suggestions on how to write the example, or advice on wheth...

On May 25, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m a little bit worried about the sheer size of the resulting > binaries of a project using LLVM. The medium large project for which > I’m planning to use it (which currently uses a custom dynamic code > generator), produces a compact 1.6 MB binary. When I compile LLVM’s > simple ‘Fibonacci’ example

...g memory costs for input files (esp. > >> minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of > >> implementing this just to do those measurements. > > > > If you do please keep it local. The bare minimum we have of library > > support is already disproportionately painful and prevents easier sharing > > with COFF. We should really not add more until the linker is done. > > This is so much in contrast with the LLVM development, I find it quite hard to see this as an acceptable position on llvm-dev. > > LLD is a subproject of the LLVM proje...