search for: disproportionated

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >>> This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do >>> w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding

Dear all,This is both an R and a statistics question. I want to test whether males and females of a given species tend to co-occur in a given sampling unit more frequently than expected by chance. I'm thinking about using a binomial distribution with p as the sex ratio of the entire population. So, even though the population sex ratio is close to 50:50, each sampling unit would have

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do >> w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding memory costs for input files (esp. >> minor faults and dTLB costs).

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: > >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:

Hi all, I'm a little bit worried about the sheer size of the resulting binaries of a project using LLVM. The medium large project for which I'm planning to use it (which currently uses a custom dynamic code generator), produces a compact 1.6 MB binary. When I compile LLVM's simple 'Fibonacci' example project the executable is 2.6 MB. I realize LLVM is a complex and

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Mikhail Zolotukhin > <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Davide, > > > > Thanks for the analysis, it's really interesting! And I'm really glad > that we now put more and more attention at the compile time! >

On Mon, April 17, 2017 17:13, Warren Young wrote: > > Also, I???ll remind the list that one of the *prior* times the systemd > topic came up, I was the one reminding people that most of our jobs > summarize as ???Cope with change.??? > At some point 'coping with change' is discovered to consume a disproportionate amount of resources for the benefits obtained. In my sole

Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do > w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding memory costs for input files (esp. > minor faults and dTLB costs). I've almost gotten to the point of > implementing this just to do those measurements. If you do please keep it local. The bare

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:10:08 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > > Mehdi Amini

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: > But this is not a technical argument. As a project, we rarely write programs, as such. We generally create reusable components that happen to have driver executables. At least long term, I think there's consensus that this is the best path. If we're going to make a different choice in this case, we need concrete reasons. We should discuss

Am 16. Juni 2019 um 15:53 Uhr +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > You will save yourself from world of hurt if you use a dummy ca to sign > you smartcard cert. You can try without generating a CRL. I see. I've done that now, but the effort required seems to be disproportionate. I'm just a single person. Requiring a full-blown CA setup is like cracking breakfast eggs with a

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> >>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>

Hi, I received a small flurry of buildbot emails yesterday. Most of them seem to be repeats of previous failures and buildbot only mailed them to me because the previous build raised an exception instead of failing. However I noticed a couple configuration/system issues amongst them: * arxan_raphael is consistently hitting the 20 minute no-output timeout when running the link command

Ok I know this is off topic, but since you guys are usualy so helpful, I thought I''d try here first. Building a Rails App and one of the things we''ve done is put a CSS class of; * { font-family:"Lucida Grande",verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; margin:0pt; padding:0pt; } Now the problem is that the padding setting, for one reason or another is killing my select

...; Is there a Config-Option to send error when ssl-connect ist not established to in cert accredited Hostname/Servername ? Did not found something like this or did not really understand function of the options. I do not know backgrounds to this issue. Cant decide if it would be a security risk or disproportionated wishes of securityexperts but i want to satisfy this costumer. How to handle thos? Thank you Andre

I've been trying to get rid of the loop scale limiting problem during BFI. Initially, this was saturating frequencies to the max side of the scale, so a double nested loop would get max frequencies in all the blocks (e.g., llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-i386.ll). This made the inner loop no hotter than the outer loop, so block placement would not bother aligning them. In convertFloatingToInteger()

I would have replied to this thread sooner, but I was busy adding more instcombines. :) The motivation for r289855 is in the commit msg (I'm out of the office and can't look things up conveniently). Feel free to revert that and the follow ups, however, if that patch caused a noticeable slowdown, then it suggests we have a bigger problem?...that's a simple matcher (no value tracking

I''m wondering whether I''m wasting my time trying to verify that an addition I''ve made to legacy code is in fact setting a new attribute on a model. Substruct''s (http://dev.subimage.com/projects/substruct) OrderHelper contains this method: 1 def create_order_from_post 2 @use_separate_shipping_address = params[:use_separate_shipping_address]

On May 25, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m a little bit worried about the sheer size of the resulting > binaries of a project using LLVM. The medium large project for which > I’m planning to use it (which currently uses a custom dynamic code > generator), produces a compact 1.6 MB binary. When I compile LLVM’s > simple ‘Fibonacci’ example

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > >