search for: disproportionally

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: >> Why? What is wrong with setting priorities and observing that what >> library support we already have has had a disproportional cost? > > Can you please elaborate on this disproportional cost? I think it is really important to be specific about these kinds of things for the benefit of all potential contributors. Yes. Getting the

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:40:43 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > > Mehdi Amini

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >>> This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do >>> w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: > >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:09:00 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and

By the way, I am currently testing this product from Skype. I would like to be able to receive calls ona Skype name on our pbx. 1) It works beautifully and you don't have to do anything in particular. 2) It's disproportionally expensive which is why I want Skype for Asterisk to work. SfS costs $5 per month per channel just to test the beta! I find that insane, but I wanted to test it. In October, they will begin charging for Skype Manager (required for SfS) and a per seat charge for that. My guess is that the one chann...

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> >>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>

hi everybody would a tool such as dbench be a valid bechmark for gluster? and, most importantly, is there any formula to estimate raw fs to gluster performance ratio for different setups? for instance: having a replicated volume, two bricks, fuse mountpoint to volume via non-congested 1Gbps or even a volume on single brick with fuse client mountpoing locally what percentage/fraction of raw

Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018 um 10:26 Uhr schrieb David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > Yes, I agree the terminology is confusing. I used the term "stream" in > the sense of stream processing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_processing). > The programming model is very different, of course, but the idea of a > stream of data that is acted upon and then essentially discarded

...reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way of explaining that ZFS keeps it''s cache in kernel and not in the freelist, it became apparent that memory is being used disproportionally to the filesystems. For example - On an M5000 (S10 U8) with 128 GB memory, we have 2 132GB disks in the root ZFS pool. There is no other ZFS in use on the system. We have approximately 4TB of vxfs filesystems with a very active Oracle database instance. When I do the math and count up the cache...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:10:08 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > > Mehdi Amini

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > Sent:

+llvmdev > On 2014 Dec 18, at 15:14, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Currently we support reading bitcode in 3 ways: > > * Read everything upfront. > * Be lazy about reading the function bodies. > * Read the bitcode over a streaming interface. > > The first two modes are commonly used and well tested. In fact the > "read

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do >> w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding memory costs for input files (esp. >> minor faults and dTLB costs).

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Rafael Avila de Espindola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>, > "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:56:41 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and

I have a linear model y~x1+x2 of some data where the coefficient for x1 is higher than I would have expected from theory (0.7 vs 0.88) I wondered whether this would be an artifact due to x1 and x2 being correlated despite that the variance inflation factor is not too high (1.065): I used perturbation analysis to evaluate collinearity library(perturb)

I am hoping for some assistance with formatting a large text file which consists of a series of individual records. Each record includes specific labels/field names (a sample of 1 record (one of the longest ones) is below - at end of post. What I want to do is reformat the data, so that each individual record becomes a row (some cells will have a lot of text). For example, the column

Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > Ok. I would like to start posting patches for review without > speculating too much on fancy/exotic things that may come later. We > shouldn't do anything that precludes extensions but I don't want to get > bogged down in a lot of details on things related to a small number of > targets.

Hi, Comments below On 13 April 2018 at 16:52, Robin Kruppe <robin.kruppe at gmail.com<mailto:robin.kruppe at gmail.com>> wrote: On 13 April 2018 at 14:37, Graham Hunter <Graham.Hunter at arm.com<mailto:Graham.Hunter at arm.com>> wrote: Hi, Nice to see another group tackling length agnostic vectorization :) I'm still reading through all the details, but I do have one