search for: displeased

Hi all! Using C6 on an Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 motherboard with AMD six core FX6300. That board uses Realtek ALC892 audio chipset. For the first time since I got that motherboard I tried plugging in headphones to the front panel speaker output. I was somewhat displeased to note that the speakers don't mute when that happens. I recall seeing info on that in Fedora, but not Centos, and haven't so far scared up how to troubleshoot it. I can MANUALLY change the setting in sound preferences, which offers only two choices: "Analog Output" and "A...

I'm a bit displeased at the way this happened. I received an email from VoicePulse. Here's some excerpts: ------------------ >We're sending you this important update so you can take advantage of improvements we've >been making to your VoicePulse Connect! service. >We've been working hard on...

Sarah et. al.: As a matter of aesthetics (i.e. my personal ocd-ness) I prefer using the public API of an object, i.e. *not* to makes use of the representation of a factor as essentially an integer vector with labels, but rather to use its documented behavior. (Feel free to ignore this remark!) Anyway, >cumsum(!duplicated(dat1$B)) [1] 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 will do it. This is very

...12/6/5 Kok, Auke-jan H <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote on systemd-devel list: > It seems your system is taking well into 15+ seconds before btrfs is > actually *ready* on your system, which seems to be the main hiccup > (note, speculation here). I''ve personally become a bit displeased with > btrfs performance recently myself, so, I''m wondering if you should try > ext4 for now. > > Other than that, after btrfs/udev finally pops to life, things seem to > start relatively quickly. I think btrfs is to blame here, because I think my system started to be affec...

Hi Tom, can you change your release process in concerns of "RC" releases at naming convention? [ Example ] Git Tag: "llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1" llvm-project prerelease tarball: "llvm-project-10.0.1rc1.tar.xz" The release Git tag is called "llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1" (here: "-rc1" with dash) but the provided prerelease tarballs have "10.0.1rc1"

> On Nov 11, 2020, at 5:38 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: >> >> I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? > > Why would you expect that a modern 8-core Intel CPU would impede I/O in any measureable way as

Hi, i have a very crazy issue: Im connecting with a NX Client to a XFCE Desktop. There is Wine, some Fonts and the Gecko Engine installed. The Installation and Update of Steam was very good, but after the Update was finished, i only see a Ghost Window of Steam (even when i kill it and start it again): [Image: http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5858/xfcesteamghost.png ] I also tried a reinstall

hi, this is a very basic question -- sorry for posing it: how can i force R to print 0.0001 instead of 1e-04??? .--------------------. | > 0.0001 | | [1] 1e-04 | `--------------------' i tried the functions format, formatC, ... and changed options()$digits with no success! thanks for advice, tomy -- no signature

On 10/19/2016 01:54 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 11:34 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>> Hello Gordon, >>> >> *snip* >>> >>> Personally I would be more concerned whether or not to enable ECDSA >>> algorithms (https://blog.cr.yp.to/20140323-ecdsa.html). >>> >> For web server ECDSA

This arose when working on an addition to coxph, which has the features that the X matrix never has an intercept column, and we remove strata() terms before computing an X matrix. The surprise: when a terms object is subset the intercept attribute is turned back on. My lines 2 and 3 below were being executed just before a call to model.frame. The simple solution was of course to do them in the

...rel_cluster/foo.pid * Fixed a parameter bug with mongrel_cluster_ctl calling mongrel_rails. How would you use some of these new features? Lets pretend that your blog gets spammed by 3000+ comments and 2000+ trackbacks pushing your process memory usage to 300mb+. The fair and just Linux kernel, displeased by your actions, smites one of your processes using the all powerful oom-killer. How do you recover? $ mongrel_rails cluster::status Checking 2 Mongrel servers... Found dog: 8000 Lost dog: 8001 $ mongrel_rails cluster::start --only 8001 --clean Cleaning 1 pid file... Starting 1 Mongrel server......

...l incur a small cost to developers in terms of the size it adds to the repository, and the tooling or workflow adjustments to handle the change. In most cases this will be minimal, even negligible. However I think the burden on runtime developers is significant. > If you are aesthetically > displeased by a project, you can hide it using sparse checkouts. And > nobody is going to make you build it. At that point, the only cost I > can think of from including a project is the bytes on disk. But since > the full history of all LLVM subprojects (excluding test-suite) is > 500mb (*), s...

Hi, Here's one way to approach it, using the coercion of factor to numeric. Note that I changed your data.frame() statement to avoid coercing strings to factors, just to make it simpler to set the levels. dat1 <-data.frame(N=seq(1, 12,1), B=c("29_log","29_log", "29_log", "27_cat", "27_cat", "1_log", "1_log",

Hi All, I have a data frame dat1: dat1 <-data.frame(N=seq(1, 12,1), B=c("29_log","29_log", "29_log", "27_cat", "27_cat", "1_log", "1_log", "1_log", "1_log", "1_log",

...developers in terms of the size it adds to the repository, and the tooling or workflow adjustments to handle the change. In most cases this will be minimal, even negligible. However I think the burden on runtime developers is significant. >> >>> If you are aesthetically >>> displeased by a project, you can hide it using sparse checkouts. And >>> nobody is going to make you build it. At that point, the only cost I >>> can think of from including a project is the bytes on disk. But since >>> the full history of all LLVM subprojects (excluding test-sui...

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at

...all cost to developers in terms of the size it adds to the repository, and the tooling or workflow adjustments to handle the change. In most cases this will be minimal, even negligible. However I think the burden on runtime developers is significant. > >> If you are aesthetically >> displeased by a project, you can hide it using sparse checkouts. And >> nobody is going to make you build it. At that point, the only cost I >> can think of from including a project is the bytes on disk. But since >> the full history of all LLVM subprojects (excluding test-suite) is >&...

...developers in terms of the size it adds to the repository, and the tooling or workflow adjustments to handle the change. In most cases this will be minimal, even negligible. However I think the burden on runtime developers is significant. >> >>> If you are aesthetically >>> displeased by a project, you can hide it using sparse checkouts. And >>> nobody is going to make you build it. At that point, the only cost I >>> can think of from including a project is the bytes on disk. But since >>> the full history of all LLVM subprojects (excluding test-sui...

Currently we have RH7.3 with compiler gcc 2.96.x My mission, should I choose to accept it, involves moving our embedded application to CentOS 4.1 with gcc 3.x Problem is that about 1/2 million lines of code that gcc 2.96 accepts gives fatal fits to the gcc 3.x compiler from CentOS 4.1 I don't know how many fatal fits, as some disguise others etc. "Can't find register to

Is it true that Solaris 10 u4 does not have any of the nice ZIL controls that exist in the various recent Open Solaris flavors? I would like to move my ZIL to solid state storage, but I fear I can''t do it until I have another update. Heck, I would be happy to just be able to turn the ZIL off to see how my NFS on ZFS performance is effected before spending the $''s. Anyone