search for: disobedient

Hey everyone, Currently where I work we use qmail. Every time a message is delivered, qmail seems to walk through the user's entire maildir in order to calculate quota usage. Delivering messages simultaneously to just a few users who are allowed large maildirs (1-2GB) will bring our servers to their knees. Which brings me to dovecot. I use dovecot whereever I can, but haven't yet

...e? i realize this is a generalized question and that iptables and many other things exist that could be implemented. im looking for a way to give the youngster the benefit of the doubt and allow them to "obey God/parents" first before they have to be totally restricted after having been disobedient. specifically we could do it two ways. one is, that which is not expressly permitted is denied... and i would prefer not to have to do it that way. it is too easy and may not allow for the child to choose to be obedient to God/parents. the other seems like it might be better, that which is not e...

...ons [3]. I think we're headed to the same destination here; the variant which I came up with (and suggested to Daniel and Luiz, CC'd) is similar: the guest self-balloons, giving up pages when it can, but the host sets a ceiling. This way, if the host really needs to set a limit, it can: a disobedient guest will start paging. But generally, a guest should use its judgement to balloon its own pages as it can (below the ceiling). Thoughts? Rusty.

...ons [3]. I think we're headed to the same destination here; the variant which I came up with (and suggested to Daniel and Luiz, CC'd) is similar: the guest self-balloons, giving up pages when it can, but the host sets a ceiling. This way, if the host really needs to set a limit, it can: a disobedient guest will start paging. But generally, a guest should use its judgement to balloon its own pages as it can (below the ceiling). Thoughts? Rusty.

...'re headed to the same destination here; the variant which I >came up with (and suggested to Daniel and Luiz, CC'd) is similar: the >guest self-balloons, giving up pages when it can, but the host sets a >ceiling. > >This way, if the host really needs to set a limit, it can: a disobedient >guest will start paging. But generally, a guest should use its >judgement to balloon its own pages as it can (below the ceiling). It sounds similar but it sounds like you are suggesting one limit value and I am suggesting two. Your ceiling value sounds like a soft limit on total guest mem...

I've set up Samba and CUPS on our testing server here, and used smbcupsadd to upload the Adobe PS drivers to the server as directed in the HOWTO (The CUPS and Samba HOWTOs differ on this point, by the way - the latter claims that PSMON.DLL is needed in addition to the eight other files. I played it safe and had it upload that, too). With the caveat that I first have to connect to each printer

...rently requires a TSC, which breaks older machines and Matt Mackall who boots the host with "notsc". In addition, there is no good solution to changing TSC speeds (informing all the guests about the TSC impending change before it happens would be a great deal of code and have issues with disobedient guests). This patch makes the host determine if the TSC is both constant and stable: if not, it doesn't tell the guest to use it. We export check_tsc_unstable() for this. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c | 3 ++- drivers/lguest/co...

...rently requires a TSC, which breaks older machines and Matt Mackall who boots the host with "notsc". In addition, there is no good solution to changing TSC speeds (informing all the guests about the TSC impending change before it happens would be a great deal of code and have issues with disobedient guests). This patch makes the host determine if the TSC is both constant and stable: if not, it doesn't tell the guest to use it. We export check_tsc_unstable() for this. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c | 3 ++- drivers/lguest/co...

Hi all! We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern questions which we're fumbling with. So if you know anyone who is using it in production? If, so, how? In particular, would you be happy with guests simply giving the host back whatever memory they can spare (as Xen's self-balloon does)?

Hi all! We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern questions which we're fumbling with. So if you know anyone who is using it in production? If, so, how? In particular, would you be happy with guests simply giving the host back whatever memory they can spare (as Xen's self-balloon does)?

Hi all, I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not implemented. Thanks & Regards, -Lokesh -- "It is not God that is worshipped but the group or authority

Ingl?s : Many already we have contributed to the first project of free software dedicated to self-management in this campaign of collective financing, it collaborates and it spreads!/ Beginning campaign collective financing http://www.goteo.org/project/rebelaos-publicacion-por-la-autogestion?lang=en Login to enter with user of social networks and for would register in Goteo :

Ingl?s : Many already we have contributed to the first project of free software dedicated to self-management in this campaign of collective financing, it collaborates and it spreads!/ Beginning campaign collective financing http://www.goteo.org/project/rebelaos-publicacion-por-la-autogestion?lang=en Login to enter with user of social networks and for would register in Goteo :

Hi I plan to set up a big file server, something like motherboard with 4 ide ports and an additional 4 ide daughter card, a PIV proc and 512 or 1024 MB ram, a 100 or 1000 MB NIC, with 6 or 7 200 GB ide HDDs in a sigle box. I don't need lightning performance, just disk space. Of course this would be served by some linux os and samba questions (relative to samba configuration and behaviour) :