search for: dismantle

.../paging.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c @@ -722,6 +722,10 @@ int paging_domctl(struct domain *d, xen_ /* Call when destroying a domain */ void paging_teardown(struct domain *d) { + /* Make sure log-dirty is turned off before trying to dismantle it. + * Needs to be done here becuse it''s covered by the hap/shadow lock */ + d->arch.paging.log_dirty.disable_log_dirty(d); + if ( hap_enabled(d) ) hap_teardown(d); else

hi, I stop libvirsh and I see it removes vnetx interfaces, but those(at least) of bridge type remain in the system after daemon is stopped. Is this intended would you know? thanks, L.

On 02/10/19 16:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? >> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the >> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier >> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated >> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? >> > So just to make sure i follow we have: > - qemu process on host with anonymous vma > -> host cpu page table > - kvm which maps host anon...

On 02/10/19 16:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? >> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the >> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier >> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated >> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? >> > So just to make sure i follow we have: > - qemu process on host with anonymous vma > -> host cpu page table > - kvm which maps host anon...

Anyone know where I can get this? I need to deduce what type of nic is a proprietary CNC machine that I don't want to dismantle so I can make a gpxe floppy for so I can run some diags of my tftp server. Thanks! jlc

On 11/12/17 10:22, Thibaut Perrin wrote: > Hello Fabien, > > First, thank you for even trying for what seems to be an impossible task :( > > Quick points :? > - if it was decided not to continue, what would happen to the current > wiki ? Dismantled or would it remain as read-only for documentation > purpose ? > - What about Sphinx <http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/> ? seems to be > frequentely used nowadays > - As you mentioned, a solution of the type of github with pull requests > for documentation updates might be a...

Hello, I was seeing an odd behavior in a proxy-only configuration of dovecot. When a user entered an incorrect password in either IMAP or POP3, the Dovecot connection would be immediately dropped, sometimes with the auth failure message, sometimes without (a timing issue). I believe I have tracked down the cause to the code commented out in the attached diff. It appears that the proxy

...atic, so I'll have to access it thru vmf_insert_pfn() >> or vmf_insert_mixed(). > > Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated with the new mapping from the source VMA)? Thanks, Paolo > You do not need > that. The workflow is: > > userspace: > ptr = mmap(/dev/kvm-mirroring-device, virtual_addresse_of_target) > > Then when the...

...atic, so I'll have to access it thru vmf_insert_pfn() >> or vmf_insert_mixed(). > > Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated with the new mapping from the source VMA)? Thanks, Paolo > You do not need > that. The workflow is: > > userspace: > ptr = mmap(/dev/kvm-mirroring-device, virtual_addresse_of_target) > > Then when the...

...rd drive I've just RMAed. I'm able to share all my files with Windows Vista & 7 without any issues at all. I installed Samba and it all worked without any issues at all, it was supper easy, just like I need it. Here is the issue: Once I had the Ubuntu system sharing well I decided to Dismantled another External hard drive add as a secondary hard drive to the system. At first I could not get Ubuntu to share it. It took me a while to get windows to see it but I did it. The issue I'm having is that Windows finds it but it says "Access Denied" contact server administrator, that...

> > There is no doubt that most security agencies have a long list of zero- >> day exploits in their toolbox - I would hazard to suggest that they >> wouldn't be doing their job if they didn't! But I seriously doubt they >> would commission exploitable code in something that is openly >> auditable. >> >> P. >> > > P., I used to think

> > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:37:51 -0700 > From: "J.H." <warthog19 at eaglescrag.net> > Subject: Re: [syslinux] USB stick meets ISO system > To: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Message-ID: <1177785471.25140.29.camel at localhost.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sat,

On 02/10/19 19:04, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the >>>> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier >>>> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated >>>> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? >> >> The KVM inspector process is also (or can be) a QEMU that will have to >> create its own KVM guest page table. So if a page in the source VMA is >>...

On 02/10/19 19:04, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the >>>> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier >>>> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated >>>> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? >> >> The KVM inspector process is also (or can be) a QEMU that will have to >> create its own KVM guest page table. So if a page in the source VMA is >>...

Hi all, I cannot find a clean way to create/edit an object that ''belongs_to'' another one, just by using form fields. I always need to explicitely unassemble it, store the master id in a hidden field, and then refetch the master from its id, and put it back in the object. To summarize: I want to create a new member, for a given project @project= ... @member =

...thru vmf_insert_pfn() > >> or vmf_insert_mixed(). > > > > Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? > > If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the > target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier > dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated > with the new mapping from the source VMA)? > So just to make sure i follow we have: - qemu process on host with anonymous vma -> host cpu page table - kvm which maps host anonymous vma to guest...

...; On 02/10/19 16:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >>> Why would you need to target mmu notifier on target vma ? > >> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the > >> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier > >> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated > >> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? > >> > > So just to make sure i follow we have: > > - qemu process on host with anonymous vma > > -> host cpu page table > >...

...Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>>> If the mapping of the source VMA changes, mirroring can update the > >>>> target VMA via insert_pfn. But what ensures that KVM's MMU notifier > >>>> dismantles its own existing page tables (so that they can be recreated > >>>> with the new mapping from the source VMA)? > >> > >> The KVM inspector process is also (or can be) a QEMU that will have to > >> create its own KVM guest page table. So if a page in the so...

...found it as well so they want to stop them using it. > > Unless you're operating an air gap network you can be damn sure that 'they' > can get into your systems if they really want to. The only truly secure machine is one that is at the bottom of a mine shaft, turned off and dismantled. :-) P.

Hi I've been using Asterisk for a while now with the TDM400 and it seems to be working fine. I'm using version 1.2.2 and I've struck a problem when I added a Budge Tone 100 SIP phone to the network. The phone rings when calls come in and I can make calls but in all cases (internal or external calls) the other party cannot hear me even though I can hear them. I'm sure I've