search for: dismally

I''d like reviewers for: 6734731 vif-vnic instances can race against each other 6734123 xpvd-event logging is dismal The webrev is at http://dme.org/solaris/webrev/xvm-script-cleanup.

This does what I was hoping it would: aggregate(tm[,-1],by=list(tm[,10]),FUN="mean") but I don't know what "tm[,-1]" means (well - the -1 bit anyway. Does it somehow means the whole matrix? Please don't tell me to check the manual - I tried and failed dismally... -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/tm-1-tp1588804p1588804.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz. I heard that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So I bought a Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new Athlon 2200+ will be twice as fast as the P III 1.13 GB. I ran a R simulation program and the new computer is only 30% faster, in fact slightly slower than a Celeron 1.50 GB laptop. I am very disappointed

We see absolutely dismal performance from Canberra to Perth via Aarnet or Grangenet (gig connections across the country). With standard rsync on a tuned tcp stack, we see about 700k/s. I started playing with the --sockopts and have increased the performance to 1.4M/s which is better, but still way off the pace. There are similar patches for ssh at

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: > One more data point for comparison > > I installed the stock samba 4.2 rpm on a centos 7 machine and ran > the same diskspd tests against a share configured with: > vfs objects = aio_pthread > aio read size = 1024 > aio read size = 1024 > > smb2 leases = yes > > I get 27MB/s with 4k

One of my customers handed me a copy of this paper and asked why are we using xen if it is so slow... http://morse.colorado.edu/~tlen5710/12s/VMware.pdf which is a fairly damning report of performance under Xen in comparison to VMWare, citing worse than 50% overhead of Xen in comparison to physical. Has anyone seen this paper before? James

Am 21.07.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Russell R Poyner: > Jeremy, > > I think this is exactly a complex interaction between FreeBSD and > Samba. Best guess would be some system call that is fast in linux but > slow in FreeBSD holding things back. > > Russ > > On 07/21/2016 01:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner

Hi, I''m seeing what can only be described as dismal striped write performance from lustre 1.6.3 clients :-/ 1.6.2 and 1.6.1 clients are fine. 1.6.4rc3 clients (from cvs a couple of days ago) are also terrible. the below shows that the OS (centos4.5/5) or fabric (gigE/IB) or lustre version on the servers doesn''t matter - the problem is with the 1.6.3 and 1.6.4rc3 client kernels

Am I correct to understand from the previous discussions on this topic (a few years back) that if I have a matrix with missing values my PCA options seem dismal if: (1) I don’t want to impute the missing values. (2) I don’t want to completely remove cases with missing values. (3) I do cov() with use=”pairwise.complete.obs”, as this produces negative eigenvalues (which it has in

As people may know, we frequently encounter errors caused by libvirt when running the libguestfs appliance. I wanted to find out exactly how frequently these happen and classify the errors, so I ran the 'virt-df' tool overnight 1700 times. This tool runs several parallel qemu:///session libvirt connections both creating a short-lived appliance guest. Note that I have added Cole's

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:42:53PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:49:09PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: > > I'm tuning a samba 4.3 install on freebsd and I'm confused about aio > > settings. > > > > I've loaded the freebsd aio kernel module and tried various values > > or aio read size and aio write size, but it seems to

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 16:25:14 +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:18:42AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >As people may know, we frequently encounter errors caused by libvirt > >when running the libguestfs appliance. > > > >I wanted to find out exactly how frequently these happen and classify > >the errors, so I ran the

I've recently installed Samba 2.2.5(from source) on a linux 2.4.19 system and am having great difficulty configuring it to work with w2k clients. My inital goal is to have Samba act as a PDC so that I may have logins to the network and provide basically a single public disk share and a home share per user. After two and a half days of dismal failures I have tried to simply get the Samba

Besides ssh.com?s PrivX product, has anyone created a web service that can be used to issue temporary certkeys to authenticated users? Any pointers appreciated! jd -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2393 bytes Desc: not available URL:

I run a small dovecot site with ~5 users, some of whom have many large mailboxes. I used to use lucene until the packagers decided that it broke some licencing rules and stopped including it. I have dismally failed to configure Solr, plus it is huge and potentially exposes too many services as well. Squash is deprecated (but still used?) in 2.2+. I am currently on 2.2.33. So what can I use? Or do I have to bite the bullet and install from source, thus losing the advantages of packaging and automat...

One more data point for comparison I installed the stock samba 4.2 rpm on a centos 7 machine and ran the same diskspd tests against a share configured with: vfs objects = aio_pthread aio read size = 1024 aio read size = 1024 smb2 leases = yes I get 27MB/s with 4k blocks and 145MB/s with 64k blocks. Disabling cacheing by passing the -h switch to diskspd lowered these to 72MB/s

Jeremy, I think this is exactly a complex interaction between FreeBSD and Samba. Best guess would be some system call that is fast in linux but slow in FreeBSD holding things back. Russ On 07/21/2016 01:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: >> One more data point for comparison >> >> I installed the stock samba

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:50:16PM +0200, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 21.07.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Russell R Poyner: > >Jeremy, > > > >I think this is exactly a complex interaction between FreeBSD and > >Samba. Best guess would be some system call that is fast in linux > >but slow in FreeBSD holding things back. > > > >Russ > > >

Hi, I purchased BF2: Complete Collection from EA's web site about a year or so ago. I was running Windows and bought it using EA's Download Manager (aka EA Link). I couldn't run the game without that program being active. Now, I proudly, run Linux full time and I can't get the game going because it still depends on EADM. I installed EADM, but it won't run. Is there a work

List, No, no questions, no complaints. Just compliments to the Samba team. Samba 3.0.11 (Red Hat RHAS3) running as (one of 5 diverse Linux servers) PDC for all (75+) wk2000 and XP professional workstations on top of an 1,560+ OpenLDAP 2.2.17 backend at Barlaeus Gymnasium ("gymnasium" means "sort of high school for over-intelligent pupils whose parents just might happen to have