search for: disknam

I have a disk on which CentOS is installed and running. The disk partitions look like this: Disk /dev/sda: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 5221 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/sda2 14 1044

...e highly available, ensure that the virtual machine is running on some other host before clicking OK. - vmware try to make its own file locking for flowing file type : http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=10051 VMNAME.vswp DISKNAME-flat.vmdk DISKNAME-ITERATION-delta.vmdk VMNAME.vmx VMNAME.vmxf vmware.log Is there a way to deal with this problem ? is that a bug ? thanks for your support, best regards Philippe Simonet

The main goal of these patch series is to implement a new API that allows to retrieve created device-mapper devices for volumes and partitions back after they have been created. As part of this patch: - required libdevmapper version was bumped to 1.02. I think it is safe because it was released more then 10 years ago; - newer version of libdevmapper allowed to simplify code base a little bit; -

On 1/10/19 11:19 AM, Roosen, Nicolas wrote: > Hello, I have a strange issue I'd like to have some insights on. > > > We have 2 running VM, the storage pool is over NFS. Unfortunately, the backend storage folder has been deleted (so the image file in it as well, obviously) ... > > > Yet, the 2 VM are still up and running, with their root filesystem being mounted

...2secs ???15:41.15????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? Disk I/O ??/proc/diskstats????mostly in KB/s?????Warning:contains duplicates????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? ?DiskName Busy Read WriteKB|0 |25 |50 |75 100| ? ?hda 0% 0.0 0.0|> |...

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb

More cleanup. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) While a Linux guest on Hyper-V can be assigned removable media devices (DVD, floppy etc), these devices are not handled by the Hyper-V block driver. So, we cleanup all the dead code dealing with removable media devices. 2) There were multiple functions to retrieve information about the device. Since much of

More cleanup. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) While a Linux guest on Hyper-V can be assigned removable media devices (DVD, floppy etc), these devices are not handled by the Hyper-V block driver. So, we cleanup all the dead code dealing with removable media devices. 2) There were multiple functions to retrieve information about the device. Since much of

The latest upstream merge changed struct block_device_operations: This merge got rid of blkvsc_media_changed and introduced the function blkvsc_check_events. This broke all the patches that were sent after the tree was closed the last time. This is a resend of this patch-set to account for this change in the kernel. More cleanup. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) While a

The latest upstream merge changed struct block_device_operations: This merge got rid of blkvsc_media_changed and introduced the function blkvsc_check_events. This broke all the patches that were sent after the tree was closed the last time. This is a resend of this patch-set to account for this change in the kernel. More cleanup. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) While a

Further cleanup of the hv drivers: 1) Cleanup the reference counting mess for both stor and net devices. 2) Handle all block devices using the storvsc driver. 3) Accomodate some host side scsi emulation bugs. 4) In case of scsi errors off-line the device. Regads, K. Y

Further cleanup of the hv drivers: 1) Cleanup the reference counting mess for both stor and net devices. 2) Handle all block devices using the storvsc driver. 3) Accomodate some host side scsi emulation bugs. 4) In case of scsi errors off-line the device. Regads, K. Y

Further cleanup of the hv drivers. 1) Cleanup reference counting. 2) Handle all block devices using the storvsc driver. I have modified the implementation here based on Christoph's feedback on my earlier implementation. 3) Fix bugs. 4) Accomodate some host side scsi emulation bugs. 5) In case of scsi errors off-line the device. This patch-set further reduces the size of

Further cleanup of the hv drivers. 1) Cleanup reference counting. 2) Handle all block devices using the storvsc driver. I have modified the implementation here based on Christoph's feedback on my earlier implementation. 3) Fix bugs. 4) Accomodate some host side scsi emulation bugs. 5) In case of scsi errors off-line the device. This patch-set further reduces the size of

Further cleanup of the hv drivers. Back in June I had sent two patch sets to address these issues. I have addressed the comments I got from the community on my earlier patches here: 1) Implement code for autoloading the vmbus drivers without using PCI or DMI signatures. I have implemented this based on Greg's feedback on my earlier implementation. 2) Cleanup error handling across

Further cleanup of the hv drivers. Back in June I had sent two patch sets to address these issues. I have addressed the comments I got from the community on my earlier patches here: 1) Implement code for autoloading the vmbus drivers without using PCI or DMI signatures. I have implemented this based on Greg's feedback on my earlier implementation. 2) Cleanup error handling across

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block