Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "disk16".
Did you mean:
disk1
2017 Sep 25
2
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
...rsion=0x0000000000038c4c0000000000038c4d
> trusted.gfid=0xf078a24134fe4f9bb953eca8c28dea9a
>
> output scrub log:
> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023] [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum]
> 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick:
> /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024] [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum]
> 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: Marking /file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a
> | Brick: /media/disk16/brick16] as corrupted..
>
> f...
2017 Sep 22
0
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
...000000718996701
trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000038c4c0000000000038c4d
trusted.gfid=0xf078a24134fe4f9bb953eca8c28dea9a
output scrub log:
[2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023]
[bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: CORRUPTION
DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick: /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID:
f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
[2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024]
[bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: Marking
/file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a | Brick:
/media/disk16/brick16] as corrupted..
file-2 output from
"...
2017 Sep 21
2
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
Hi,
I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when
running scrub it was marked as bad.
Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt
how can I do this?
regards
Amudhan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170921/f69ff7be/attachment.html>
2017 Oct 03
1
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
...;> trusted.gfid=0xf078a24134fe4f9bb953eca8c28dea9a
>>>
>>> output scrub log:
>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023]
>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick: /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID:
>>> f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024]
>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>> Marking /file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a | Brick:
>>>...
2017 Sep 29
1
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
...0000000000038c4d
>> trusted.gfid=0xf078a24134fe4f9bb953eca8c28dea9a
>>
>> output scrub log:
>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023]
>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick: /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID:
>> f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024]
>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: Marking
>> /file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a | Brick:
>> /media/disk16/brick...
2017 Nov 06
0
how to verify bitrot signed file manually?
...3eca8c28dea9a
>>>>>
>>>>> output scrub log:
>>>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023]
>>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick: /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID:
>>>>> f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
>>>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024]
>>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>>> Marking /file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-ec...
2011 May 12
1
Slow reading speed over RDMA
...ing tests, both gluster and lustre
give me, respectively, results of 600 to 700MByte/s.
The gluster configuration files have no extra modifications, the disks are
formatted with ext3 and created via:
gluster volume create test stripe 16 transport rdma 10.1.0.4:/disk1
10.1.0.4:/disk2 ... 10.1.0.4:/disk16
Using DD to write/read from each of the disks gives me about 100MByte/s.
Would there be anything obvious I'm missing? What would be causing this low
reading speed? I tried playing with the performance parameters, setting up
more or less cache and io-threads, but the results did not improve....